An evaluation framework for e-government projects

Citizens and E-Government: Evaluating Policy and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 69-90

  Fitsilis, Panos ^a,b   Anthopoulos, Leonidas ^a   Gerogiannis, Vassilis C ^a  

^a TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LARISSA   (Greece)

^b Technological Research Center of Thessalia   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053612170     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-931-6.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Accenture. (2005a, January). Driving High Performance in Government: Maximizing the Value of Public-Sector Shared Services. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.accenture.com
2. Accenture. (2005b, April). Leadership in Customer Service: New Expectations, New Experiences. The Government Executive Series. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.accenture.com
3. Anthopoulos, L., Siozos, P., Nanopoulos, A., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2006). The Bottom-up Design of e-government. Development Methodology based on a Collaboration Environment. e-Service Journal, 4(3).
4. Anthopoulos, L., Siozos, P., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2007). Applying Participatory Design and Collaboration in Digital Public Services for discovering and re-designing e-government services. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 353-376. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.07.018
5. Anthopoulos, L., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2005). The implementation model of a Digital City. The case study of the first Digital City in Greece: e-Trikala. Journal of E-Government, 2(2).
6. Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. J., & Swan, J. E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 10(6), 62-81. doi:10.1108/08876049610148602
7. Barclay, C. (2008). Towards an integrated measurement of IS project performance: The project performance scorecard. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 331-345. doi:10.1007/s10796-008-9083-6
8. Batini, C., Viscusi, G., & Cherubini, D. (2009). GovQual: A quality driven methodology for egovernment project planning. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 106-117. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.002
9. Boonen, K., & Brand, H. (2008). IT Governance CobiT 4.1 - A Management Guide (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Van Haren Publishing.
10. British Standards Institution. (2002). BS 60791:2002 Project Management: Guide to project management.
11. British Standards Institution. (2003). [Quality management systems: Guidelines for quality management in projects.]. BS ISO, 10006, 2003.
12. Cap Gemini Ernst & Young. (2005). Online availability of public services. How is Europe progressing? Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/online_5th_measurement_fv4.pdf
13. Carnegie Mellon University. (2002). Capability Maturity Model Integration: CMMI for Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Integrated Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1). Carnegie Mellon University.
14. Council of the European Union. (2003). Council Resolution on the implementation of the eEurope 2005 Action Plan. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2005/doc/all_about/benchmarking/resolution.doc
15. Dymond, K.M. (2005). A Guide to the CMMI: Interpreting the Capability Maturity Model Integration, Process Transition International Inc., 2005.
16. Esteves, J., & Joseph, R. C. (2008). A comprehensive framework for the assessment of e-government projects. Government Information Quarterly, 25(1), 118-132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.009
17. European Commission. (2002). eEurope 2005: An information society for all, European Commission - COM 263, 2002. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://europa.eu.int/eeurope
18. Fenton, N., & Pfleeger, S. L. (1997). Software Metrics - A Rigorous Approach. London: International Thomson Publishing.
19. Gant, J., & Gant, D. (2002). Web portal functionality and State Government E-service. In the Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (IEEE 2002).
20. German Federal Government. (2003). BundOnline 2005. 2003 Implementation Plan. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.en.bmi.bund.de
21. Greek Information Society Observatory. (2008). Measuring e-Europe 2005 and i2010 indices. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.observatory.gr/files/meletes/eEuropei2010_05-07.pdf
22. Information Society DG. (2006). i2010 Benchmarking Framework. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarking/060220_i2010_benchmarking_framework_nov_2006.doc
23. International Project Management Association. (2009). Project Excellence Model. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.apm.org.uk/ProjectExcellence.asp
24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1999). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
25. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008, June 24). Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4654. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1148386
26. Kelly P., & Stalnaker M.L. (2002). Avoiding IT Project Disasters of Counsel. ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry, 21(7), 13-23.
27. Liu, A. N. N., & Walker, A. (1998). Evaluation of project outcomes. Construction Management and Economics, 16(2), 209-219. doi:10.1080/014461998372493
28. Liu, J., Derzsi, Z., Raus, M., & Kipp, A. (2008). eGovernment Project Evaluation: An Integrated Framework. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5184, 85-97. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9_8
29. National Technical University of Athens. (2008a). Implementation methodology for the study 'Improving ICT investment effectiveness in Public Administration.' Greek Information Society Observatory. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.observatory.gr/files/meletes/MVA_D0_gr.pdf
30. National Technical University of Athens. (2008b). Comparative evaluation of different stages of the ICT investment efficiency for the study Improving ICT investment effectiveness in Public Administration. Greek Information Society Observatory. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.observatory.gr/files/meletes/MVA_D1_gr.pdf
31. National Technical University of Athens. (2008c). Evaluation framework for the study 'Improving ICT investment effectiveness in Public Administration.' Greek Information Society Observatory. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.observatory.gr/files/meletes/MVA_D3_gr.pdf
32. Office of Government Commerce. The Stationary Office (2005). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. London.
33. Pressman, R. (2009). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
34. Programme Management Maturity Model. (2009). The Programme Management Web Site. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.e-programme.com/
35. Project Management Institute Standard Committee (2004). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.
36. Shenhar, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5-13.
37. The Standish Group. (2001). Extreme Chaos. The Standish Group. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research
38. Treasury Board Secretariat. (2001, August 10). Canada's Report on Portals. Government of Canada.
39. UK Cabinet Office. (2000). e-government, a strategic framework for public services in the information age. UK Cabinet Office. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/e-envoy/resources-pdfs/$file/Strategy.pdf
40. UK Cabinet Office. (2002). Office of the e-Envoy, e-government Interoperability Framework (e-GIF). Part two: Technical Policies and Specifications, Office of the e-Envoy. UK Cabinet Office. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/e-GIF4Pt2_2002-04-25.pdf
41. United Nations. (2008). UN E-Government Survey - From e-government to Connected Government. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN028607.pdf
42. US Federal Government. (2002). E-Government Strategy: Simplified Delivery of Services to Citizens. Office of Management and Budget, US Federal Government. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www.firstgov.gov/Topics/Includes/Reference/egov_strategy.pdf
43. Van Der Westhuizen, D., & Fitzgerald, E. P. (2005). Defining and measuring project success. In the Proceedings of the European Conference on IS Management, Leadership and Governance, 07-08 Jul 2005, Reading, United Kingdom.
44. Van Iwaarden, J., Van der Wiele, T., Ball, L., & Millen, R. (2003). Applying SERVQUAL to Web sites: an exploratory study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 919-935. doi:10.1108/02656710310493634
45. th International Conference of e-government (ICEG, 2007). Retrieved April 26, 2009, from http://www.iceg.net/2007/books/1/20_308.pdf
46. Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717-733. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002
47. Wateridge, J. (1998). How can IT/IS projects be measured for success? International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 59-63. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00022-7
48. Zhen-Wei Qiang, C., Lanvin, B., & Minges, M. Swanson, E., Wellenius, B., Clarke, G., Halewood, N., Adamali, A., Coffey, J., & Safdar, Z. (2006). Global trends and policies - 2006: information and communications for development. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2006/04/20/000012009_20060420105118/Rendered/PDF/359240PAPER0In101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf