Demographic heterogeneity, cohort selection, and population growth

Ecology

Volumn 92, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1985-1993

  Kendall, Bruce E ^a,b   Nogeire, Theresa M ^a   Fox, Gordon A ^c   Fujiwara, Masami ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohort selection; Demographic heterogeneity; Frailty; Population dynamics; Structured population model; Survival

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; GENETIC VARIATION; GROWTH RATE; HETEROGENEITY; PARENT-OFFSPRING INTERACTION; POPULATION MODELING; POPULATION STRUCTURE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SENESCENCE; STOCHASTICITY; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COHORT ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; COHORT STUDIES; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 80053597508     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/11-0079.1     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Beckage, B., and J. S. Clark. 2003. Seedling survival and growthof three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity.Ecology 84:1849-1861. (Pubitemid 37435714)
2. Bérubé, C. H., M. Festa-Bianchet, and J. T. Jorgenson. 1999.Individual differences, longevity, and reproductive senescencein bighorn ewes. Ecology 80:2555-2565. (Pubitemid 30001004)
3. Bollinger, E. K., and T. A. Gavin. 2004. Responses of nestingbobolinks (Dolichonyx oryzivorus) to habitat edges. Auk121:767-776. (Pubitemid 38946460)
4. Boulding, E. G., and T. Hay. 2001. Genetic and demographicparameters determining population persistence after adiscrete change in the environment. Heredity 86:313-324. (Pubitemid 32722471)
5. Boulding, E., and K. Van Alstyne. 1993. Mechanisms ofdifferential survival and growth of two species of Littorina onwave-exposed and on protected shores. Journal of ExperimentalMarine Biology and Ecology 169:139-166.
6. Boyce, M. S., C. V. Haridas, and C. T. Lee, and the NCEASStochastic Demography Working Group. 2006. Demographyin an increasingly variable world. Trends in Ecology andEvolution 21:141-148.
7. Bronikowski, A. M., S. C. Alberts, J. Altmann, C. Packer,K. D. Carey, and M. Tatar. 2002. The aging baboon:comparative demography in a non-human primate. Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:9591-9595. (Pubitemid 34764657)
8. Cam, E., W. A. Link, E. G. Cooch, J.-Y. Monnat, and E.Danchin. 2002. Individual covariation in life-history traits:seeing the trees despite the forest. American Naturalist159:96-105. (Pubitemid 34077594)
9. Carey, J. R., P. Liedo, and D. Orozco. 1992. Slowing ofmortality-rates at older ages in large medfly cohorts. Science258:457-461. (Pubitemid 23397778)
10. Casellas, J., J. L. Noguera, and L. Varona. 2004. Viability ofIberian3 Meishan F2 newborn pigs. II. Survival analysis upto weaning. Journal of Animal Science 82:1925-1930. (Pubitemid 38893255)
11. Charlesworth, B. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations.Second edition. Volume 141. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, UK.
12. Claessen, D. 2005. Alternative life-history pathways and theelasticity of stochastic matrix models. American Naturalist165:E27-E35.
13. Cohen, J. E. 1986. An uncertainty principle in demography andthe unisex issue. American Statistician 40:32-39.
14. Conner, M. M., and G. C. White. 1999. Effects of individualheterogeneity in estimating the persistence of small populations.Natural Resource Modeling 12:109-127.
15. Cowley, D. E., and W. R. Atchley. 1992. Quantitative geneticmodels for development, epigenetic selection, and phenotypicevolution. Evolution 46:495-518.
16. Doblhammer, G., and J. Oeppen. 2003. Reproduction and longevity among the British peerage: the effect of frailty and health selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B270:1541-1547. (Pubitemid 36960283)
17. Ducrocq, V., B. Besbes, and M. Protais. 2000. Geneticimprovement of laying hens viability using survival analysis.Genetics, Selection, Evolution 32:23-40.
18. Engen, S., O. Bakke, and A. Islam. 1998. Demographic andenvironmental stochasticity-concepts and definitions. Biometrics54:840-846.
19. Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection.Second edition. Dover, New York, New York, USA.
20. Fox, G. A., and B. E. Kendall. 2002. Demographic stochasticityand the variance reduction effect. Ecology 83:1928-1934. (Pubitemid 36524782)
21. Fox, G. A., B. E. Kendall, J. W. Fitzpatrick, and G. E.Woolfenden. 2006. Consequences of heterogeneity in survivalprobability in a population of Florida scrub-jays. Journal ofAnimal Ecology 75:921-927. (Pubitemid 44356622)
22. Franklin, A. B., D. R. Anderson, R. J. Gutiérrez, and K. P.Burnham. 2000. Climate, habitat quality, and fitness inNorthern Spotted Owl populations in northwestern California.Ecological Monographs 70:539-590.
23. Garibotti, G., K. R. Smith, and R. A. Kerber. 2006. Longevityand correlated frailty in multigenerational families. Journalof Gerontology: Biological Sciences 61A:1253-1261. (Pubitemid 46147781)
24. Gates, J. E., and L. W. Gysel. 1978. Avian nest dispersion andfledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59:871-883.
25. Gerdes, L. U., B. Jeune, K. A. Ranberg, H. Nybo, and J. W.Vaupel. 2000. Estimation of apolipoprotein E genotypespecificrelative mortality risks from the distribution ofgenotypes in centenarians and middle-aged men: apolipoproteinE gene is a "frailty gene," not a "longevity gene."Genetic Epidemiology 19:202-210.
26. Gillespie, J. H. 1975. Natural selection for within-generationvariance in offspring number II. Discrete haploid models.Genetics 81:403-413.
27. Isberg, S. R., P. C. Thomson, and F. W. Nicholas. 2006.Quantitative analysis of production traits in saltwatercrocodiles (Crocodylus porosus): III. Juvenile survival.Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123:44-47.
28. Johnson, D. H., K. P. Burnham, and J. D. Nichols. 1986. Therole of heterogeneity in animal population dynamics. Pages1-15 in Proceedings of the 13th International BiometricsConference, Session 5. Biometric Society, Alexandria, Virginia,USA.
29. Johnstone, R. A. 2004. Begging and sibling competition: how should offspring respond to their rivals? American Naturalist163:388-406. (Pubitemid 38459259)
30. Kendall, B. E., and G. A. Fox. 2002. Variation amongindividuals and reduced demographic stochasticity. ConservationBiology 16:109-116. (Pubitemid 34190432)
31. Kendall, B. E., and G. A. Fox. 2003. Unstructured individualvariation and demographic stochasticity. Conservation Biology17:1170-1172.
32. Krkpatrick, M., and R. Lande. 1989. The evolution ofmaternal characters. Evolution 43:485-503.
33. Lande, R., and S. Shannon. 1996. The role of genetic variationin adaptation and population persistence in a changingenvironment. Evolution 50:434.
34. Landis, R. M., J. Gurevitch, G. A. Fox, W. Fang, and D. R.Taub. 2005. Variation in recruitment and early demographyin Pinis ridida following crown fire in the pine barrens ofLong Island, New York. Journal of Ecology 93:607-617. (Pubitemid 40801927)
35. Lavergne, S., and J. Molofsky. 2007. Increased geneticvariation and evolutionary potential drive the success of aninvasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences USA 104:3883-3888. (Pubitemid 47181548)
36. Lindström, J. 1999. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:343-348. (Pubitemid 29376841)
37. Lloyd-Smith, J. O., S. J. Schreiber, and P. E. Kopp. 2005.Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature 438:355-359. (Pubitemid 41643951)
38. Manolis, J. C., D. E. Andersen, and F. J. Cuthbert. 2002. Edgeeffect on nesting success of ground nesting birds nearregenerating clearcuts in a forest-dominated landscape. Auk119:955-970. (Pubitemid 36154426)
39. Manser, M. B., and G. Avey. 2000. The effect of pupvocalisations on food allocation in a cooperative mammal,the meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behavioral Ecology andSociobiology 48:429-437.
40. Manton, K. G., E. Stallard, and J. W. Vaupel. 1981. Methodsfor comparing the mortality experience of heterogeneouspopulations. Demography 18:389-410.
41. Marshall, D. J., R. Bonduriansky, and L. F. Bussieŕe. 2008.Offspring size variation within broods as a bet-hedgingstrategy in unpredictable environments. Ecology 89:2506-2517.
42. McDonald, D. B., J. W. Fitzpatrick, and G. E. Woolfenden. 1996. Actuarial senescence and demographic heterogeneity in the Florida Scrub Jay. Ecology 77:2373-2381.
43. Melbourne, B. A., and A. Hastings. 2008. Extinction riskdepends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity.Nature 454:100-103. (Pubitemid 351931967)
44. Menge, B. A., E. L. Berlow, and C. A. Blanchette. 1994. Thekeystone species concept: variation in interaction strength ina rocky intertidal habitat. Ecological Monographs 64:249-286.
45. Nussey, D. H., T. Coulson, and M. Festa-Bianchet. 2008.Measuring senescence in wild animal populations: towards a longitudinal approach. Functional Ecology 22:393-406. (Pubitemid 351703926)
46. Pereira, H. M., and G. C. Daily. 2006. Modeling biodiversitydynamics in countryside landscapes. Ecology 87:1877-1885.
47. Pletcher, S. D., and J. W. Curtsinger. 1998. Mortality plateausand the evolution of senescence: Why are old-age mortality rates so low? Evolution 52:454-464.
48. Reid, J. M., E. M. Bignal, S. Bignal, and D. I. McCracken.2003. Age-specific reproductive performance in red-billedchoughs Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax: patterns and process in anatural population. Journal of Animal Ecology 72:765-776. (Pubitemid 37065132)
49. Robert, A., F. Sarrazin, and D. Couvet. 2003. Variation amongindividuals, demographic stochasticity, and extinction: responseto Kendall and Fox. Conservation Biology 17:1166-1169. (Pubitemid 37435376)
50. Service, P. M. 2000. Heterogeneity in individual mortality riskand its importance for evolutionary studies of senescence.American Naturalist 156:1-13. (Pubitemid 30416436)
51. Silvertown, J. W. 1984. Phenotypic variety in seed germinationbehavior: the ontogeny and evolution of somatic polymorphismin seeds. American Naturalist 124:1-16. (Pubitemid 15276958)
52. Stover, J. P., B. E. Kendall, and G. A. Fox. 2011. Demographicheterogeneity impacts density-dependent population dynamics.Theoretical Ecology. [doi: 10.1007/s12080-011-0129-x]
53. van Groenendael, J., H. de Kroon, S. Kalisz, and S.Tuljapurkar. 1994. Loop analysis: evaluating life history pathways in population projection matrices. Ecology75:2410-2415.
54. Vaupel, J. W., and J. R. Carey. 1993. Compositionalinterpretations of medfly mortality. Science 260:1666-1667.
55. Vaupel, J. W., and A. I. Yashin. 1983. The deviant dynamics ofdeath in heterogeneous populations. Research Reports RR-83-1. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,Laxenburg, Austria.
56. Vaupel, J. W., and A. I. Yashin. 1985. Heterogeneity's ruses:some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics.American Statistician 39:176-185.
57. Venable, D. L. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. American Naturalist 126:577-595.
58. Venable, D. L., and A. Búrquez M. 1990. Quantitative geneticsof size, shape, life-history, and fruit characteristics of the seed heteromorphic composite Heterosperma pinnatum II. Correlation structure. Evolution 44:1748-1763.
59. Vindenes, Y., S. Engen, and B.-E. Sæther. 2008. Individualheterogeneity in vital parameters and demographic stochasticity. American Naturalist 171:455-467. (Pubitemid 351417024)
60. von Holst, D., H. Hutzelmeyer, and P. Kaetzke. 2002. Socialrank, fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in wild European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Behavioral Ecologyand Sociobiology 51:245-254. (Pubitemid 36064243)
61. Wardle, G. M. 1998. A graph theory approach to demographicloop analysis. Ecology 79:2539-2549. (Pubitemid 28472089)
62. Willi, Y., and A. A. Hoffmann. 2009. Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:124-133.
63. Winter, M., D. H. Johnson, and J. Faaborg. 2000. Evidence foredge effects on multiple levels in tallgrass prairie. Condor102:256-266. (Pubitemid 30322758)
64. Wintrebert, C. M. A., A. Zwinderman, E. Cam, R. Pradel, and J. C. van Houwelingen. 2005. Joint modelling of breeding and survival in the kittiwake using frailty models. Ecological Modelling 181:203-213. (Pubitemid 39444314)
65. Yashin, A. I., I. A. Iachine, and J. R. Harris. 1999. Half of thevariation in susceptibility to mortality is genetic: Findingsfrom Swedish twin survival data. Behavior Genetics 29:11-19. (Pubitemid 29265762)