Joint modelling of breeding and survival in the kittiwake using frailty models

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 181, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 203-213

  Wintrebert, Claire M A ^a   Zwinderman, A H ^b   Cam, E ^c   Pradel, R ^d   Van Houwelingen, J C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^d CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

Author keywords

Capture recapture; Frailty; Individual heterogeneity; Joint modelling; MCMC

Indexed keywords

BREEDING PROBABILITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; CORRELATION METHODS; ECOLOGY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

BREEDING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION MODELING; SEABIRD; SURVIVAL;

BRETAGNE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE; WORLD;

ANIMALIA; AVES; RISSA TRIDACTYLA;

EID: 7444227017     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abramowitz M., and Stegun I. Handbook of Mathematical Functions 1965 Dovers Publications New-York
2. Andersen P., Borgan O., Gill R., and Keiding N. Statistical Models based on Counting Processes 1993 Springer-Verlag New-York
3. Bennett P.M., and Owens I.P.F. Evolutionary Ecology of Birds: Life Histories, Matin Systems, and Extinction 2002 Oxford University Press Broch 272
4. Cam E., Hines J., Monnat J., Nichols J., and Danchin E. Are nonbreeders prudent parents? The Kittiwake model Ecology 79 1998 2917 2930
5. Cam, E., Link, W.A., Cooch, E.G., Monnat, J., Danchin, E., 2002. Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. Am. Naturalist, 159, in press.
6. Cam E., and Monnat J. Stratification based on reproductive success reveals contrasting patterns of age-related variation in demographic parameters in the Kittiwake Oikos 90 2000 560 574
7. Caswell H. Matrix Population Models. Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation 2001 Sinauer Associates Sunderland, MA
8. Conner M.M., and White G.C. Effects of individual heterogeneity in estimating the persistence of small populations Natural Resource Model. 12 1999 109 127
9. Coulson J., and Thomas C. Differences in the breeding performance of individual kittiwake gulls, Rissa tridactyla (L.) Sibly R.M. Smith R.H. Behavioural Ecology 1985 Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford 489 503
10. Coulson J., and Wooller R. Differential survival rates among breeding kittiwake gulls Rissa tridactyla (L.) J. Anim. Ecol. 45 1976 205 213
11. Elbers C., and Ridder G. True and spurious duration dependence: the identifiability of the proportional hazard model Rev. Econ. Stud. XLIX 1982 403 409
12. GAUSS, 2002. Aptech systems Inc. GAUSS, Maple Valley, WA.
13. Gelman A., and Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion) Stat. Sci. 7 1992 457 511
14. Gelman, A., Rubin, D.B., 1992b. A single sequence from the Gibbs sampler gives a false sense of security, vol. 4. In: Bernardo, J.M., Berger, J.O., Dawid, A.P., Smith, A.F.M. (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 625-631.
15. Grist E.P.M., and des Clers S. Seasonal and genotypic influences on life-cycle synchronisation: further insights from annual squid Ecol. Modell. 115 1999 149 163
16. Henderson R., Diggle P., and Dobson A. Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and recurrent events Biostatistics 1 2000 465 480
17. Hogan J.W., and Laird N.M. Model-based approaches to analysing incomplete longitudinal and failure time data Stat. Med. 16 1997 259 272
18. Holmes D.J., and Sherry D. Selected approaches to using individual variation for understanding mammalian life history evolution J. Mammal. 78 1997 311 319
19. Hougaard P. Modelling heterogeneity in survival data J. Appl. Prob. 28 1991 695 701
20. Jorgensen S.E. Editorial: ecological modelling in 100 volumes Ecol. Modell. 100 1997 1 4
21. Keiding N., Andersen P.K., and Klein J.P. The role of frailty models and accelerated failure time models in describing heterogeneity due to omitted covariates Stat. Med. 16 1997 215 224
22. Linacre N.A., and Keough M.J. Demographic effects of fragmentation in modular organisms: illustrated using the bryozoan Mucropetraliella ellerii (MacGillivray) Ecol. Modell. 170 2003 61 71
23. Link W., Cam E., Nichols J., and Cooch E. Of bugs and birds: Markov Chain Monte Carlo for hierarchical modeling in wildlife research J. Wildlife Manage. 66 2 2002 277 291
24. Littell R., Milliken G., Stroup W., and Wolfinger R. SAS system for mixed models 1996 SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC
25. Nisbet I., and Cam E. Test for age-specificity in survival of common tern J. Appl. Stat. 29 1-4 2002 65 83
26. Oli M.K. Partial life cycle models: how good are they? Ecol. Modell. 169 2003 313 325
27. Pitt W.C., Box P.W., and Knowlton F.F. An individuals-based model of canid populations: modelling territoriality and social structures Ecol. Model. 166 2003 109 121
28. Pontier D., Auger P., de la Parra R.B., and Sanchez E. The impact of behavorial plasticity at individual level on domestic cat population dynamics Ecol. Modell. 133 2000 117 124
29. Salinger D.H., Anderson J.J., and Hamel O.S. Ecol. Modell. 166 2003 287 294
30. Service P.M. Heterogeneity in individual mortality risk and its importance for evolutionary studies of senescence Am. Naturalist 156 2000 1 13
31. Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., Gilks, W., 1996. BUGS 0.5, Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling, Manual. Cambridge.
32. Stearns S. The Evolution of Life Histories 1992 Oxford University Press New York
33. Thomas C., and Coulson J. Clutton-Brock T.H. Reproductive Success 1988 The University of Chicago Press Chicago 251 262
34. van Tienderen P. Life cycle trade offs in matrix population models Ecology 76 1995 2482 2489
35. Williams B.K., Nichols J., and Conroy M. Analysis and Management of Animal Populations 2002 Academic Press San Diego, USA
36. Wulfsohn M.S., and Tsiatis A.T. A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error Biometrics 53 1999 330 339