Variation among Individuals, Demographic Stochasticity, and Extinction: Response to Kendall and Fox

Conservation Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1166-1169

  Robert, Alexandre ^a   Sarrazin, François ^a   Couvet, Denis ^b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTINCTION;

CANIDAE;

EID: 0344742281     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02259.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Conner, M. M., and G. C. White. 1999. Effects of individual heterogeneity in estimating the persistence of small populations. Natural Resource Modelling 12:109-127.
2. Kendall, B. E., and G. A. Fox. 2002. Variation among individuals and reduced demographic stochasticity. Conservation Biology 16:109-116.
3. Legendre, S., and J. Clobert. 1995. ULM, unified life models, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists. Journal of Applied Statistics 22:817-834.
4. Lindén, M., and A. P. Møller. 1989. Cost of reproduction and covariation of life history traits in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4: 367-371.
5. Lynch, M., J. Blanchard, D. Houle, T. Kibota, S. Schultz, L. Vassilieva, and J. Willis. 1999. Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53:645-663.
6. Robert, A., D. Couvet, and F. Sarrazin. 2002. Fitness heterogeneity and viability of restored populations. Animal Conservation 5:153-161.