A strategy for neighborhood decline and regrowth: Forging the french connection

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 800-837

  Savitch, H V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

development versus social equity; French vis vis American urban policy; Marseille's development; neighborhood decline and growth; urban strategy and planning

Indexed keywords

EQUITY; NEIGHBORHOOD; REGROWTH; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

FRANCE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053596831     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087411416443     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ABT Associates Inc. & the New School for Social Research, EZ/EC Interim Outcomes Assessment Evaluation Conference; 1997San Francisco, CA; 1997. 26.
2. Agence d'Urbanisme d'Agglomération Marseillaise (AGAM). 2005. Les Demandeurs d'Emploi. Marseille, France: AGAM.
3. Métropolitains. Marseille, France: AGAM; 2009:.
4. Bendick Marc,Rasmussen David W.Reagan and The Cities. Peterson George E.Lewis Clark W., ed. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press; 1986:.
5. Boarnet Marlon G.,Bogart William T.Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from New Jersey.Journal of Urban Economics. 1996;40 (2): 198-215.
6. Bondonio Danielle,Engberg JohnRegional Science and Urban Economics. 2000:519-49.
7. Cibon H.Marseille: Une Métropole entre Europe et Méditerranée. Langevin PhilippeJuan Jean-Claude, ed. Paris, France: La Documentation Francaise; 2007:.
8. Community-Wealth. 2007. Strategies and models: Community development corporations. http://www.community-wealth.org/strategies/apnel/cdcs/index.html (accessed March 10, 2011).
9. ConnellJames P.KubischAnne C.1998. Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: Progress, prospects, and problems. https://communities.usaidallnet.gov/fa/system/files/Applying+Theory+of+Change+Approach.pdf (accessed June 11, 2011).
10. Dikec MustafaAntipode. 2008. Two decades of French Urban policy: From social development of neighborhoods to the Republican Penal State. Antipode 38 (1):59-80.
11. Donzel AndreLeadership and urban regeneration: Cities in North America and Europe. Judd Dennis R.Parkinson Michael, ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Series; 1990:.
12. Donzel AndreMarseille: L'experience de la cite. Canberra, Australia: Anthropos Research and Publications; 1998:.
13. Donzel AndreMarseille: Une Métropole entre Europe et Méditerranée. Langevin PhilippeJuan Jean-Claude, ed. Paris, France: La Documentation Francaise; 2007:.
14. Donzel Andre,Maisetti NicolasReseaux politiques locaux et internationalization des villes: Marseille et le projet euromediterraneen. 2009:.
15. Dubois J.,Douay N.,DaSilva J.Gouvernance (La) métropolitaine: Réalisation d'un état des connaissances, critique et prospectif, sur les enjeux de la métropolisation. La Défense: MTETM-PUCA; 2007:.
16. Engberg John,Greenbaum Robert T.State enterprise zones and local housing markets.Journal of Housing Research. 1999;10 (2): 163-87.
17. EuroMéditerranée. 1998. Schema de Reference d'Urbanisme d' EuroMéditerranée. September. Marseille, France: EuroMéditerranée.
18. EuroMéditerranée. 2000. Schema du Reference. November. Marseille, France: EuroMéditerranée.
19. EuroMéditerranée. 2008. L'Europe des Métropoles: Entre rayonnement et attractivité. June. Marseille, France: EuroMéditerranée.
20. EuroMéditerranée. 2009. L'internationalisation des métropoles. March. Marseille, France: EuroMéditerranée.
21. Fainstein Susan S.2001. The city builders: Property development in New York and London, 1980-2000. 2nd ed., revised. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas; 2001:.
22. A case for the case study. Feagin Joe R.Orum Anthony M.Sjoberg Gideon, ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1991:.
23. Frieden Bernard J.,Kaplan MarshallThe politics of neglect: Urban aid from model cities to revenue sharing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1975:.
24. Galster George,Tatian Peter,Accordino John.Targeting investments for neighborhood revitalization.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2006;72 (4): 457-74.
25. General Accounting Office (GAO). Community development: Progress on economic development activities varies among the empowerment zones. 1998:. Report to the Subcommittee on Human Resources, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, November 1998.
26. Gerring JohnCase study research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
27. Gilderbloom John I.Invisible city. Austin, TX: University Press of Texas; 2008:.
28. GlaeserEdward L.2010. Shrinking Detroit back to greatness. The New York Times, March16. http://economix.blogs.nytimes/2010/03/16/shrinking-detroit-back-to-greatness (accessed March 10, 2011).
29. Journal of Political Economy. Glaeser Edward L.Gyourko Joseph, ed. 2005:345-75.
30. Grant Jill L.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2002:71-84.
31. Hoffman-Martinot V.,Nevers J. Y.Urban innovation and autonomy: Political implications of policy change. Clarke Susan E., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Newbury Park; 1989:.
32. Hollander Justin B.Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research. 2010:133-51.
33. Hollander Justin B.,Pallagst Karina,Schwarz Terry,Popper FrankProgress in Planning. 2009:223-32.
34. Institut National de la Statistiques Economiques (INSEE). 2009. Forces et faiblesses economiques de la zone d'emploi de Marseille-Aubagne. http://www.insee.fr/fr/insee_regions/provence/themes/dossier/ze09/st9349.pdf (accessed March 11, 2010).
35. Institut National de la Statistiques Economiques (INSEE). 2002a. Atlas des métropolitains de la région urbaine de Marseille-Aix-en-Provence. Edition 2002-tome 1: Le Territoire. http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?reg_id=5&ref_id=4874 (accessed March 11, 2010).
36. Institut National de la Statistiques Economiques (INSEE). 2002b. Atlas des métropolitains de la région urbaine de Marseille-Aix-en-Provence. Edition 2002-tome 2: Les habitants, pp. 18-19. http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?ref_id=8383 (accessed March 11, 2010).
37. Institut National de la Statistiques Economiques (INSEE). 2002c. Atlas des métropolitains de la région urbaine de Marseille-Aix-en-Provence. Edition 2002-tome 3: Activité et emploi, p. 18. http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?ref_id=8384®_id=5 (accessed March 11, 2010).
38. Keating W. Dennis,Krumholz NormanJournal of the American Planning Association. 1991:136-52.
39. Krumholz Norman,Forester JohnMaking equity planning work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1990:.
40. LanksBelinda. 2006. Creative shrinkage. The New York Times Magazine, December10. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E6D91631F933A25751C1A9609C8B63 (accessed March 11, 2010).
41. Lawrence Eric,Stoker Robert,Wolman Harold.Crafting urban policy.Urban Affairs Review. 2010;45 (3): 412-30.
42. Lefevre C.La Politique Urbaine en France. Institut Francais d'Urbanisme-Champs-sur-Marne; 2010:.
43. Leo Christopher,Brown Wilson.Slow growth and urban development policy.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2002;22 (2): 193-213.
44. Levine Marc V.Journal of Urban Affairs. 1987:103-23.
45. Levitan Sar A.,Taggart RobertThe promise of greatness: The social programs of the last decade and their major achievements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1976:.
46. Lynch KevinThe image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1960:.
47. Marseille Provence Métropole. n.d., Communauté Urbaine, Stratégie de Développement Economique.
48. Mayor of Allauch. Integration Forcee d'Allauch. Allauch, France:; 1999:12.
49. Mollenkopf John H.,Castells ManuelThe dual city: Restructuring New York. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1991:.
50. Competitive cities in the global economy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2006:.
51. Shrinking cities, Vol. 1, International research. Oswalt Philipp, ed. Ostfildern, Germany: Hatje Cantz Verlag; 2005:.
52. Shrinking Cities, Vol. 2, Interventions. Oswalt Philipp, ed. Ostfildern, Germany: Hatje Cantz Verlag; 2006:.
53. Popkin Susan J.,Katz Bruce,Cunningham Mary K.,Brown Karen D.,Gustafson Jeremy,Turner Margery A.A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press and The Brookings Institution Press; 2004:.
54. Porter Michael.The competitive advantage of the inner city.Harvard Business Review. 1995;:55-74.
55. PulsipherIan. 2008. Evaluating enterprise zones. NCSL/Annie E. Casey Partnership on Family Economic Success. http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=12806 (accessed March 2, 2011).
56. Robinson TonyUrban Studies. 1996:1647-70.
57. Rohe William M.,Bratt Rachel G.,Biswasl ProtipEvolving challenges for community development corporations: The causes and impacts of failures, downsizings and mergers. Chapel Hill: Center for Urban and Regional Studies, University of North Carolina; 2003:.
58. RozhonTracie. 2006. From the ground up. MetropolisMag.com, May15. http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20060515/from-the-ground-up (accessed March 16, 2011).
59. Rubin Irene S.,Rubin Herbert J.Urban Affairs Quarterly. 1987:37-62.
60. Rybczynski Witold,Linneman Peter D.How to save our shrinking cities.Public Interest. 1999;135 (Spring): 30-44.
61. Savitch H. V.,Kantor PaulCities in the international marketplace: The political economy of urban development in North America and Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2002:.
62. Savitch H. V.,Osgood Jeffery L.Government and Opposition. 2010:406-35.
63. Schilling Joseph,Logan JonathanJournal of the American Planning Association. 2008:451-66.
64. Sola-Morales I.Anyplace, USA, Anyone Corporation Shrinking cities and the need for a reinvented understanding of the city. Vienna: AESOP 2005; 1995 2005:.
65. Stoecker RandyJournal of Urban Affairs. 1997:1-23.
66. Talen EmilyJournal of Planning Education and Research. 2008:277-93.
67. Thomas June Manning,Hee-Yun HwangJournal of Planning Education and Research. 2003:8-23.
68. Le jugement des habitants de Marseille sure l'opération EuroMed et la perception de la réhabilitation de la rue de la République. 2005;:.
69. Compendium of government finance. Washington, DC: Census Bureau; 2002:.
70. Vey Jennifer S.Restoring prosperity: The state role in revitalizing America's older industrial cities. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 2007:.
71. Vidal Avis C.Rebuilding communities: A national study of urban community development corporations. New York: Community Development Research Center, Graduate School of Management and Urban Policy, New School for Social Research; 1992:.
72. Vidal Avis C.Revitalizing Urban Neighborhoods. Keating W. DennisKrumholz Norman, ed. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; 1996:.
73. Weiss Carol H.New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and context. Connell James P.Kubisch Anne C.Schorr Lisbeth B.Weiss Carol H., ed. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute; 1995:65-92.
74. White House, Office of the Press Secretary, 1993. Background Briefing by Senior Administrative Officials, May4.
75. Zimmerman JeffreyCities. 2008:230-42.