Crafting urban policy: The conditions of public support for urban policy initiatives

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 412-430

  Lawrence, Eric ^a   Stoker, Robert ^a   Wolman, Harold ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

National urban policies; Policy framing; Policy targeting; Urban policy

Indexed keywords

AID; POLICY MAKING; TARGETING; URBAN POLICY;

EID: 72149117381     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087409348588     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2006. Cooperative Congressional Election Study: Common content. Palo Alto, CA: Polimetrix.
2. Baumgartner, Frank, and Bryan Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
3. Burstein, Paul. 2003. The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly 56, no. 1 (March 2003): 29-40.
4. Cleveland, Frederick. 1969. Congress and urban problems. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5. Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
6. Haider, Donald. 1974. When governments come to Washington. New York: Free Press.
7. Jacoby, William G. 2000. Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 4 (October 2000): 750-67.
8. Kellstedt, Paul M. 2000. Media framing and the dynamics of racial policy preferences. American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 2,(April 2000): 245-60.
9. Kingdon, John. 2003. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
10. Malhotra, Neil, and John Krosnick. 2007. The effect of survey mode and sampling on inferences about political attitudes and behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet surveys with nonprobability samples. Political Analysis 15, no. 3: 286-323.
11. Nelson, Thomas E., and Zoe M. Oxley. 1999. Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics 61, no. 4 (November 1999): 1040-67.
12. Ross, Bernard, and Levine, Myron. 2006. Urban politics: Power in metropolitan America, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
13. Schneider, Anne and Helen Ingram. 1993. Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334-347.
14. Shulman, Robin. 2009. New White House office to redefine what urban policy encompasses. The Washington Post, July 3, 2009, p. A6.
15. Sides, John, Sarah Binder, Eric Lawrence, and Forrest Maltzman. 2006. Cooperative Congressional Election Study: George Washington University module. Palo Alto, CA: Polimetrix.
16. Skocpol, Theda. 1991. Targeting within universalism: Politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In The urban underclass, ed. Christopher Jencks and Paul E. Peterson, 411-436. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Wilson, William J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
18. Wolman, Harold. 1999. Urban policy processes at the national level: The hidden world of urban politics. In The policy process, ed. Stuart Nagel, 25-46. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
19. Wolman, Harold, and Lisa Marckini. 1998. Changes in central-city representation and influence in Congress since the 1960s. Urban Affairs Review 34, no. 2: 291-312.