Targeting investments for neighborhood revitalization

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 457-474

  Galster, George ^a   Tatian, Peter ^b   Accordino, John ^c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; NEIGHBORHOOD; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; TAX SYSTEM; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN RENEWAL;

NORTH AMERICA; RICHMOND COUNTY [VIRGINIA]; UNITED STATES; VIRGINIA;

EID: 33847416956     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360608976766     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Accordino, J., Galster, G. & Tatian, P. (2005, July). The impacts of targeted public and nonprofit investment on neighborhood development. Richmond: Federal Reserve Bank, Community Affairs Office.
2. Bartik, T. (1992). The effects of state and local taxes on economic development: A review of recent research. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 102-110.
3. Baum, H. S. (2001). How should we evaluate community initiatives? Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(2), 147-158.
4. Blank, S. (2000). Good works: Highlights of a study on the Center for Family Life. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
5. Bleakly, K., Holin, M. J., Fitzpatrick, L., & Hodes, L. (1983). A case study of local control over housing development: The neighborhood strateg area demonstration. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
6. Bloom, H. S., & Glispie, B. (1999). The feasibility of using interrupted time-series analysis to measure jobs-plus impacts on employment and earnings: Preliminary findings for Cleveland and Dayton. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
7. Bright, E. M. (2000). Reviving America's forgotten neighborhoods. New York: Garland Publishing.
8. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9. Can, A. (1997). Spatial segmentation in urban house prices: Alternative approaches. (Policy, Research, Evaluation, and Training Division working paper). Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
10. Can, A., & Megbolugbe, I. (1997). Spatial dependence and house price index construction. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 14(1-2) 203-222.
11. City of Richmond. (2002, October). 2000 Census Data Report #12: 1990-2000 Poveny Statistics by Census Tract. Richmond, VA: Author.
12. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
13. Downs, A. (1981). Neighborhoods and urban development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14. Ellen, I. G., Schiff, M. H., Susin, S., & Schwartz, A. E. (2001). Building homes, reviving neighborhoods: Spillovers from subsidized construction of owner-occupied housing in New York City. Journal of Housing Research, 12(2), 185-216.
15. Ellen, I., & Voicu, I. (2006). Nonprofit housing and neighborhood spillovers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 31-52.
16. Erickson, R. A., & Friedman, S. W. (1989). Enterprise zones: An evaluation of state government policies (Final Report prepared for Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce). University Park, PA: Center for Regional Business Analysis, Pennsylvania State University.
17. Freeman, A. M. (1979). Hedonic prices, property values and measuring environmental benefits: A survey of the issues. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81, 154-171.
18. Fulbright-Anderson, K., Kubisch, A. C., & Connell, J. P. (Eds.). (1998). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, vol. 2: Theory, measurement, and analysis. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
19. Galster, G. (1987). Homeowners and neighborhood reinvestment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20. Galster, G., Hayes, C., & Johnson, J. (2005). Identifying robust, parsimonious indicators. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 265-280.
21. Galster, G., Temkin, K., Walker, C., & Sawyer, N. (2004). Measuring the impacts of community development initiatives. Evaluation Review, 28(6), 1-38.
22. Galster, G., Walker, C., Hayes, C., & Boxall, P. (2004). Measuring the impact of CDBG spending on urban neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 15(4), 903-934.
23. Goetze, R. (1976). Buikiing neighborhood confidence. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (6), 1420-1443.
25. Granovetter, M., & Soong, R. (1988). Threshold models of diversity: Chinese restaurants, residential segregation, and the spiral of silence. Sociological Methodology, 18, 69-104.
26. Grogan, P. S., & Proscio, T. (2000). Comeback cities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
27. James, F. J. (1991). The evaluation of enterprise zone programs. In R. E. Green (Ed.), Enterprise zones: New directions in economic development (pp. 225-240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Keating, W. D. (1990). The emergence of community development corporations. Shelterforce, 5 (47), 8-11.
29. Keating, W. D., Krumholz, N., & Star, P. (Eds.). (1996). Revitalizing urban neighborhoods. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
30. Lemann, N. (1994, January 9). The myth of community development. New York Times Magazine, 27-31, 50-60.
31. Marquez, B. (1993). Mexican-American community development corporations and the limits of directed capitalism. Economic Development Quarterly, 7, 287-295.
32. Morley, T. (1998). Building better futures community report. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Foundation.
33. Mueller, E. (1995). The social effects of community development. New York: Community Development Research Center, New School for Social Research.
34. Newman, K., & Ashton, P. (2004). Neoliberal urban policy and new paths of neighborhood change in the American inner city. Environment and Planning A, 36(7) 1151-1172.
35. Palmquist, R. (1992). Valuing localized externalities. Journal of Urban Economics, 31, 59-68.
36. Pierce, N., & Steinbach, C. (1987). Corrective capitalism. New York: Ford Foundation.
37. Proscio, T. (2002). Structures of opportunity. Developing the neighborhood jobs initiative in Fort Worth, Texas. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
38. Rossi, P. (1999). Evaluating community development interventions. In R. Ferguson & W. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 521-559, 565-567). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
39. Rothenberg, J. (1967). Economic evaluation of urban renewal Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
40. Rubin, H. (1994). There aren't going to be any bakeries here if there is no money to afford jellyrolls: The organic theory of community-based development. Social Problems, 41, 401-421.
41. Sacks, D. (2004). Neighborhoods in Bloom Progress Report and Proposed FY05 Federal Funds Budget Presentation. Unpublished document. Washington DC: Urban Institute.
42. Sawicki, D. S., & Flynn, P. (1996). Neighborhood indicators: A review of the literature and an assessment of conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2) 165-183.
43. Schill, M. H., Ellen, I. G., Schwartz, A. E., & Voicu, I. (2002). Revitalizing inner-city neighborhoods: New York City's ten year plan. Housing Policy Debate, 13, 529-566.
44. Schwartz, A. E., Ellen, I. G., Voicu, I., & Schill, M. H. (in press). The external effects of subsidized housing investment. Regional Science and Urban Economics.
45. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Fxperimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
46. Slater, T., Curran, W. & Lees, L. (2004). Guest editorial: Gentrification research: new directions and critical scholarship. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1141-1150.
47. Smith, B. C. (2003). The impact of community development corporations on neighborhood housing markets: Modeling appreciation. Urban Affairs Review, 39 (2), 181-204.
48. Smith, M., & Hevener, C. (2005). The impact of housing rehabilitation on local neighborhoods: The case of St. Joseph's carpenter society (Community Affairs Department Discussion Paper). Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank.
49. Stoecker, R. (1997). The CDC model of urban development: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19(1), 1-22.
50. Taub, R. P. (1988). Community capitalism Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
51. Taub, R. P. (1990). Nuance and meaning in community development: Finding community and development. New York: Community Development Research Center, New School for Social Research.
52. Taub, R. P., Taylor, D. G., & Dunham, J. (1984). Paths of neighborhood change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Taylor, D. G. (2002). Measuring community change and its causes: Lessons from MCICs experience. Chicago: Metropolitan Community Information Center.
54. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2005, April 26). Community Development Block Grant formula (GAO-05-622T). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
55. Vidal, A., Howitt, A. M., & Foster, K. P. (1986). Stimulating community development: An assessment of the local initiatives support corporation. Cambridge, MA: State, Local and Intergovernmental Center, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
56. Walsh, J. (1997). Stories of renewal: Community building and the future of urban America. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
57. Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluation research: Methods of assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
58. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59. Zielenbach, S. (2003). Assessing economic change in HOPE VI neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 14(4), 621-655.