Meeting multiple sustainability goals: Non-motorized access and non-work trip usage on public transit

International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 174-194

  Paget Seekins, Laurel ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Non motorized access; Non work trips; Public transit; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; NON-MOTORIZED ACCESS; NON-PARAMETRIC TEST; NON-WORK TRIPS; PUBLIC TRANSIT; TRANSIT SYSTEMS;

MASS TRANSPORTATION;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ACCESSIBILITY; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN TRANSPORT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053588722     PISSN: 15568318     EISSN: 15568334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2011.585218     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alshalalfah B, Shalaby A. 2007. Case study: Relationship of walk access distance to transit with service, travel, and personal characteristics. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 133(2):114-118.
2. American Public Transportation Association. 2007. A Profile of Public Transportation Passenger Demographics and Travel Characteristics Reported in On-Board Surveys. Washington, DC: American Public Transportation Association.
3. Badoe D, Yendeti M. 2007. Impact of transit-pass ownership on daily number of trips made by urban public transit. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 133(4):242-249.
4. Boschmann E, Kwan M. 2008. Toward socially sustainable urban transportation: Progress and potentials. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2(3):138-157.
5. Brown J, Thompson G. 2009. Express bus versus rail transit: How the marriage of mode and mission affects transit performance. Paper presented to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11-15.
6. Brown J, Thompson G. 2009. Making a successful LRT-based regional transit system: Lessons from five New Start cities. Paper presented to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11-15.
7. Brundtland G. (Ed.). 1987. Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Center for Transit-Oriented Development. 2009. Destinations Matter: Building Transit Success. Oakland, CA: Reconnecting America.
9. Cervero R. 2001. Walk-and-Ride: Factors influencing pedestrian access to transit. Journal of Public Transportation 3(4):1-23.
10. Coffel K, Parks J, Semler C, Sampson DJ, Henry C, Calves G, Kachedoorian C, Levinson HS, Schofer JL. 2009. Literature Review for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations: Transit Cooperative Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
11. Crowley D, Shalaby A, Zarei H. 2009. Access walking distance, transit use and the success of TOD in North York City Centre. Paper presented to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11-15.
12. Derrible S, Kennedy C. 2009. A network analysis of subway systems in the world using updated graph theory. Paper presented to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11-15.
13. El-Geneidy A, Tetreault P, Surprenant-Legault J. 2010. Pedestrian access to transit: Identifying redundancies and gaps using a variable service area analysis. Paper presented to the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 10-14.
14. Feitelson E. 2002. Introducing environmental equity dimensions into the sustainable transport discourse: Issues and pitfalls. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7(2):99-118.
15. Frank L, Chapman J, Bradley M, Lawton T. 2005. Travel Behavior, Emissions & Land Use Correlation Analysis in the Central Puget Sound. Seattle: Washington State Transportation Commission.
16. Garrett M, Taylor B. 1999. Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal 13:6-27.
17. Giuliano G. 2005. Low income, public transit, and mobility. Transportation Research Record 1927:63-70.
18. Grengs J. 2002. Community-based planning as a source of political change. Journal of the American Planning Association 68(2):165.
19. Jeon C, Amekudzi A. 2010. Understanding of relationship among key sustainability measures in transportation: Using influence diagrams. Paper presented to the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 10-14.
20. Jeon C, Amekudzi A, Guensler RL. 2008. Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performance measures and indexes. Paper presented to the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 13-17.
21. Johnston R. 2008. Indicators for sustainable transportation planning. Transportation Research Record 2067:146-154.
22. Kim S, Ulfarsson GF, Hennessy JT. 2007. Analysis of light rail rider travel behavior: Impacts of individual, built environment, and crime characteristics on transit access. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 41(6):511-522.
23. Lucas K. 2006. Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40:801-809.
24. Lucas K, Marsden G, Brooks M, Kimble M. 2007. Assessment of capabilities for examining long-term social sustainability of transport and land use strategies. Transportation Research Record 2013:30-37.
25. Martens K. 2006. Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Planning Journal 19:1-17.
26. McGuckin N, Srinivasan N. 2005. The work trip in the context of daily travel: Census data for transportation planning conference. Available at http://ctpp.transportation.org/Future/slides/051105/mcguickin.ppt
27. Mitropoulos L, Prevedouros P, Nathanail E. 2010. Assessing sustainability for urban transportation modes: Conceptual framework. Paper presented to the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 10-14.
28. Morency C, Trepanier M, Demers M. 2009. Walking to public transit: A win-win solution for sustainable transportation. Paper presented to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11-15.
29. Musso A, Vuchic V. 1988. Characteristics of metro networks and methodology for their evaluation. Transportation Research Record 1162:22-33.
30. Ryan S, Frank L. 2009. Pedestrian environments and transit ridership. Journal of Public Transportation 12(1):39-57.
31. Thompson G, Matoff T. 2003. Keeping up with the Joneses: Radial vs. multidestinational transit in decentralizing regions. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(3): 296-310.
32. Zhang M. 2009. Bus vs. rail: A meta-analysis of cost characteristics, carrying capacities, and land use impacts. Paper presented to the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11-15.