Keeping up with the joneses: Radial vs. multidestinational transit in decentralizing regions

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 296-312

  Thompson, Gregory L ^a   Matoff, Thomas G ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 0042326863     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308978021     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bernick, M., and Cervero, R., 1996. Transit villages for the 21st century, New York:McGraw-Hill.
2. Black, A., 1995. Urban mass transportation planning, New York:McGraw-Hill.
3. Cambridge Systematics. 1992. Characteristics of urban transportation systems, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Transportation.
4. Cervero, R., 1998. The transit metropolis:A global enquiry, Washington, DC:Island Press.
5. Downs, A., 1992. Stuck in traffic:Coping with peak-hour traffic congestion, Washington, DC:Brookings Institution.
6. Federal Transit Administration. 1998. 1998 National transit database Retrieved from http://www.ntdprogram.com/ NTD/ntdhome.nsf/Docs/NTDData?OpenDocument
7. Fielding, G. J., 1987. Managing public transit strategically:A comprehensive approach to strengthening service and monitoring performance, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
8. Fielding, G. J., 1995. “ Transit in American cities ”. In The geography of urban transportation, 2nd ed., Edited by:Hanson, S., 287–304. New York:Guilford Press.
9. Firestone, D., 2001. 90's suburbs of West and South:Denser in one, sprawling in the other ‘Electronic version’. New York Times, April 17
10. Giuliano, G., 1995. “ Land use impacts of transportation investments:Highways and transit ”. In The geography of urban transportation, 2nd ed., Edited by:Hanson, S., 305–341. New York:Guilford Press.
11. Hodge, D. C., 1995. “ My fair share:Equity issues in urban transportation ”. In The geography of urban transportation, 2nd ed., Edited by:Hanson, S., 359–375. New York:Guilford Press.
12. Jones, D., 1985. Urban transit policy:An economic and political history, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
13. Kain, J. F., and Liu, Z., 1999. Secrets of success:Assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers. Transportation Research Part A, 33:601–624.
14. Knight, R. L., and Trygg, L. L., 1977. Land use impact of rapid transit:Implications of recent experience, Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary for Policy, Plans, and International Affairs
15. Meyer, J. R., and Gomez-Ibanez, J., 1981. Autos, transit, and cities, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
16. Meyer, J. R., Kain, J. F., and Wohl, M., 1966. The urban transportation problem, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
17. Orski, K., 1988. “ Traffic and transit futures ”. In Transit, land use and urban form, Edited by:Attoe, W., 37–46. Austin:University of Texas, School of Architecture, Center for the Study of American Architecture.
18. Pucher, J., and Lefèvre, C., 1996. The urban transport crisis in Europe and North America, London:MacMillan Press.
19. Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. M., 1977. Public transportation and land use policy, Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
20. Richmond, J., 1998. New rail transit investments:A review, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
21. Rosenbloom, S., 1992. “ Why working families need a car ”. In The automobile, the built environment, and daily urban life, Edited by:Wachs, M., and Crawford, M., 39–56. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
22. Sacramento Regional Transit District. 1996. Daily weekday ridership, passenger miles, vehicle hours & miles, revenue trips, Sacramento, CA:Author.
23. Schumann, J., 1999. Memorandum table showing comparison of fleet, operational and patronage data for Columbus and Sacramento Transit Systems 1987 and 1995, Portland, OR:LTK Engineering Services.
24. Texas Transportation Institute. 2002. 2002 Urban mobility study, Exhibit A-5:Annual hours of delay 2000 Retrieved May 2003 from http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/study/ appendix_A/exhibit_A-5.pdf
25. Thompson, G. L., 1977. Planning considerations for alternative transit route structures. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43:158–168.
26. Thompson, G. L., 1998. Identifying gainers and losers from transit service change:A method applied to Sacramento. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18:125–136.
27. U. S. Census Bureau. 2000. Census 2000 PHC-T-3. Ranking tables for metropolitan areas:1990 and 2000 (Tables 1 and 2) Retrieved June 2001 from http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/phc-t3.html
28. Vuchic, V. R., 1999. Transportation for livable cities, New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research.
29. Wendall Cox Consultancy. 1990a. All U.S. urbanized areas:1990 ranked by urban fringe (suburban) density Retrieved June, 2001, from http://www.demographia.com/db-ua90subdens.htm
30. Wendall Cox Consultancy. 1990b. Central business districts (CBD) 1990:Employment & market share in major metropolitan areas Retrieved June, 2001, from http://www.publicpurpose.com/dm-uscbd.htm
31. Wendall Cox Consultancy. 1990c. Journey to work market shares:US central business districts 1990 Retrieved June, 2001, from http://www.publicpurpose.com/ut-uscbd.htm
32. Weyrich, P., and Lind, W. S., 1999. Does transit work? A conservative reappraisal, Washington, DC:Free Congress Foundation.