Age-related differences in the morphology of microdamage propagation in trabecular bone

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 44, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 2659-2666

  Green, Jessica O ^a,b   Wang, Jason ^a   Diab, Tamim ^a   Vidakovic, Brani ^c   Guldberg, Robert E ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Bone; Cancellous; Fatigue; Microdamage

Indexed keywords

AGE-RELATED; CANCELLOUS; CORTICAL BONE; DAMAGE AREA; DIFFUSE DAMAGE; ENERGY DISSIPATION MECHANISM; FATIGUE TESTS; FEMORAL HEADS; HUMAN TRABECULAR BONE; MICRO-DAMAGE; MICRODAMAGE DENSITY; NUMBER OF CYCLES; STAINING TECHNIQUES; STRESS LEVELS; TRABECULAR BONES; UNI-AXIAL COMPRESSION;

AGING OF MATERIALS; CRACKS; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; FATIGUE TESTING; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MORPHOLOGY; STRESSES;

BONE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BONE INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INJURY SEVERITY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROMORPHOLOGY; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TRABECULAR BONE; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 80053560486     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allen M.R., Burr D.B. Skeletal microdamage: less about biomechanics and more about remodeling. Clin. Rev. Bone Miner. Metabol. 2008, 6:24-30.
2. Arlot M.E., Burt-Pichat B., et al. Microarchitecture influences microdamage accumulation in human vertebral trabecular bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23(10):1613-1618.
3. Badiei A., Bottema M.J., et al. Influence of orthogonal overload on human vertebral trabecular bone mechanical properties. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2007, 22(11):1690-1699.
4. Bergot C., Laval-Jeantet A.M., et al. Measurement of anisotropic vertebral trabecular bone loss during aging by quantitative image analysis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1988, 43(3):143-149.
5. Burr D.B., Forwood M.R., et al. Bone microdamage and skeletal fragility in osteoporotic and stress fractures. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1997, 12(1):6-15.
6. Burr D.B., Martin R.B., et al. Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J. Biomech. 1985, 18(3):189-200.
7. Burr D.B., Stafford T. Validity of the bulk staining technique to seperate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1990, 260:305-308.
8. Burr D.B., Turner C.H., et al. Does microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone?. J. Biomech. 1998, 31(4):337-345.
9. Caler W.E., Carter D.R. Bone creep-fatigue damage accumulation. J. Biomech. 1989, 22(6-7):625-635.
10. Carter D.R., Caler W.E. Cycle-dependent and time-dependent bone fracture with repeated loading. J. Biomech. Eng. 1983, 105(2):166-170.
11. Cook R.B., Zioupos P. The fracture toughness of cancellous bone. J. Biomech. 2009, 42(13):2054-2060.
12. Currey J.D., Brear K., et al. The effects of ageing and changes in mineral content in degrading the toughness of human femora. J. Biomech. 1996, 29(2):257-260.
13. Diab T., Condon K.W., et al. Age-related change in the damage morphology of human cortical bone and its role in bone fragility. Bone 2006, 38(3):427-431.
14. Diab T., Vashishth D. Effects of damage morphology on cortical bone fragility. Bone 2005, 37(1):96-102.
15. Guo X.E., McMahon T.A., et al. Finite element modeling of damage accumulation in trabecular bone under cyclic loading. J. Biomech. 1994, 27(2):145-155.
16. Huja S.S., Hasan M.S., et al. Development of a fluorescent light technique for evaluating microdamage in bone subjected to fatigue loading. J. Biomech. 1999, 32(11):1243-1249.
17. Keaveny T.M., Guo X.E., et al. Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J. Biomech. 1994, 27(9):1127-1136.
18. Keaveny T.M., Yeh O.C. Architecture and trabecular bone-toward an improved understanding of the biomechanical effects of age, sex and osteoporosis. J. Musculoskeleton Neuronal Interact. 2002, 2(3):205-208.
19. Linde F. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Dan. Med. Bull. 1994, 41(2):119-138.
20. Linde F., Hvid I. Stiffness behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomech. 1987, 20(1):83-89.
21. Michel M.C., Guo X.D., et al. Compressive fatigue behavior of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 1993, 26(4-5):453-463.
22. Moore T.L., Gibson L.J. Fatigue microdamage in bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2003, 125(6):769-776.
23. Moore T.L., Gibson L.J. Fatigue of bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2003, 125(6):761-768.
24. Moore T.L., O'Brien F.J., et al. Creep does not contribute to fatigue in bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2004, 126(3):321-329.
25. Mosekilde L. Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences. Bone 1989, 10(6):425-432.
26. Norman T.L., Yeni Y.N., et al. Influence of microdamage on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone 1998, 23(3):303-306.
27. O'Brien F.J., Taylor D., et al. An improved labelling technique for monitoring microcrack growth in compact bone. J. Biomech. 2002, 35(4):523-526.
28. O'Brien F.J., Taylor D., et al. Microcrack accumulation at different intervals during fatigue testing of compact bone. J. Biomech. 2003, 36(7):973-980.
29. O'Neal J.M., Diab T., et al. One year of alendronate treatment lowers microstructural stresses associated with trabecular microdamage initiation. Bone 2010, 47(2):241-247.
30. Pattin C.A., Caler W.E., et al. Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. J. Biomech. 1996, 29(1):69-79.
31. Schaffler M.B., Choi K., et al. Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. Bone 1995, 17(6):521-525.
32. Seeman E. Reduced bone formation and increased bone resorption: rational targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int. 2003, 14(Suppl. 3):S2-S8.
33. Shi X., Liu X.S., et al. Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone. Bone 2010, 46(5):1260-1266.
34. Sobelman O.S., Gibeling J.C., et al. Do microcracks decrease or increase fatigue resistance in cortical bone?. J. Biomech. 2004, 37(9):1295-1303.
35. Stepan J.J., Burr D.B., et al. Low bone mineral density is associated with bone microdamage accumulation in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Bone 2007, 41(3):378-385.
36. Thomsen J.S., Ebbesen E.N., et al. A new method of comprehensive static histomorphometry applied on human lumbar vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 2000, 27(1):129-138.
37. Vashishth D., Behiri J.C., et al. Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: concept of microcrack toughening. J. Biomech. 1997, 30(8):763-769.
38. Vashishth D., Tanner K.E., et al. Contribution, development and morphology of microcracking in cortical bone during crack propagation. J. Biomech. 2000, 33(9):1169-1174.
39. Wang X., Niebur G.L. Microdamage propagation in trabecular bone due to changes in loading mode. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(5):781-790.
40. Wang X., Shen X., et al. Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone. Bone 2002, 31(1):1-7.
41. Yang P.F., Bruggemann G.P., et al. What do we currently know from in vivo bone strain measurements in humans?. J. Musculoskeleton Neuronal Interact. 2011, 11(1):8-20.
42. Zioupos P. Accumulation of in-vivo fatigue microdamage and its relation to biomechanical properties in ageing human cortical bone. J. Microsc. 2001, 201(Pt 2):270-278.
43. Zioupos P. Ageing human bone: factors affecting its biomechanical properties and the role of collagen. J. Biomater. Appl. 2001, 15(3):187-229.