In vivo velocity and flow errors quantification by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging

Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS'08 - "Personalized Healthcare through Technology"

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1377-1380

  Garcia J ^a,b   Kadem, L ^b   Larose, E ^c   Pibarot, P ^c  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); ERRORS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL ENCODING; SIGNAL SAMPLING;

IN-VIVO; LINEAR MODELING; OPTIMAL NUMBER; PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE CONTRAST METHOD; TIME SHIFTS; UP SAMPLING;

VELOCITY;

AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; HEART; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PULMONARY ARTERY;

AORTIC VALVE; ARTIFACTS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; HEART; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PULMONARY ARTERY;

EID: 61849135256     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2008.4649421     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Taylor C.A., Draney M. Experimental and computational methods in cardiovascular fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2004; 36:197-231.
2. DairArmellina E, Hamilton C.A., Hundley W.G. Assessment of Blood Flow and Valvular Heart Disease Using Phase-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Echocardiography. 2007; 24 (2): 207-216.
3. Caruthers S.D., Lin S.L., Brown P. et al. Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis. Circulation. 2003; 108:2236-2243.
4. Lotz J., Meier C., Leppert A., Galanski M. Cardiovascular Flow Measurement with Phase-Contrast MR Imaging: Basic Facts and Implementation. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:651-671.
5. Sahn D. J., Vick III G. W., Review of new techniques in echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging as applied to patients with congenital heart disease. Heart 2001; 86:41-53.
6. Hansen M., Baltes C., Tsao J., Kezerke S., et al. Accelerated dynamic Fourier velocity encoding by exploiting velocity-spatio-temporal correlations. MAGMA 2004. 17:86-94.
7. Gelfand E., Manning W. J. Assessment of valvular heart disease with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2007. 17 (2):120-132.
8. Chai P., Mohiaddin R. How we perform carvascular magnetic resonce flow assessment using phase-contrast velocity mapping. J Cardiol Mag Res. 2005. 7:705-716.
9. Firmin D., N., Nayler G. L. Kilner P.J. Longmore D.B. The Application of Phase shifts in NMR for Flow Measurements. Magnetic Res in Med. 1990. 14:230-241.
10. Elkins C. J., Alley M. T. Magnetic resonance velocimetry: applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the measurement of fluid motion. Exp Fluids 2007 43:823-858.
11. Gatehouse P. D., Keegan J., Crowe L. A., Masood S. et al. Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol 2005 15:2172-2184.
12. Li C., Xu C., Gui C., Fox M.D. Level Set Evolution Without Re-initialization: A New Variational Formulation. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR'05.
13. Hundley W. G., Li H., F., Willard J. E., Landau C., et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation. Comparison with Invasive Techniques. Circulation 1995; 92:1151-1158.
14. Schmidt M., Crnac J., Dederichs B., Theissen P. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease. Int J of Cardiac Imaging 1997. 13:219-231
15. Botnar R, Nagel E., Scheidegger M., B., Pedersen E. M. et al. Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performace by magnetic resonace velocity imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 2000; 10:18-26.
16. Kozerke S., Hansenkam J. M., Nygaard H., Paulsen P. K. et al. Heart Motionadapted MR Velocity Mapping of Blood Velocity Distribution Downstream of Aortic Valve Prostheses: Initial Experience. Radiology 2001; 218:548-555.
17. Kilner P. J., Gatehouse P. D., Firmin D. N. Flow Measurement by Magnetic Resonance: A Unique Asset Worth Optimising. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance 2007; 9:4, 723-728.
18. Powell A. J., T. Geva. Blood Flow Measurement by Magnetic Resonace Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 21:47-58, 2000.
19. Chernobelsky A., Shubayev O., Comeau C. R., Wolff S.D. Baseline Correction of Phase Contrast Images Improves Quantification of Blood Flow in the Great Vessels. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance 2007; 9:4, 681-685.
20. Lew C.D., Alley M.T., Bammer R. et al. Peak Velocity and Flow Quantification Validation for Sensitivity-Encoded Phase-Contrast MR Imaging. Acad Radiol 2007, 14:258-269.
21. Tanaka K., Makaryus A.N., Wolff S.D. Correlation of Aortic Valve Area Obtenied by the Velocity-Encoded Phase Contrast Continuity Method to Direct Planimetry using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance 2007; 9:5, 799-805.
22. Yap S., Van Geuns R, meijboom F.J., Kirschbaum S.W. et al. A Simplified Continuity Equation Approach to the Quantification of Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valves using Velocity-Encoded Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Magnetic Resonance 2007; 9:6, 899-906.
23. Walters E.A., Caruthers S.D., Wickline S.A. Correlation Analysis of Stenotic Aortic Valve Flow Patters Using Phase Contrast MRI. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2005; 33, 7:878-887.