Ethical considerations in scientific writing

Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 124-128

  Carver, Jane ^a   Dellva, Ben ^a   Emmanuel, Patricia ^a   Parchure, Ritu ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; CASE STUDY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 80053523555     PISSN: 02537184     EISSN: 19983816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0253-7184.85425     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Committee on Publication Ethics. Available from: http://www/ publicationethics.org/. [Last accessed on 2011 May 18].
2. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Available from: http://www.icmje.org. [Last accessed on 2011 May 18].
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/. [Last accessed on 2011 May 18].
4. Office of Science and Technology and Policy Fact Sheet. Research Misconduct - A New Definition and New Procedures for Federal Research Agencies. Available from: http://clinton3.nara.gove/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/9910-20-2.html. [Last accessed on 2011 June 13].
5. Fischer BA, Zigmond MJ. Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism. Urol Oncol 2011;29:100-3.
6. Heitman E, Litewka S. International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urol Oncol 2011;29:104-8.
7. Hosseini M, Bazargani R, Latiff L, Hanachi P, Hassan S, Orthman M. Medical researchers in non-English countries and concerns about unintentional plagiarism. J Med Ethics Hist Med 2009;2:14.
8. Neelakantan S. In India, plagiarism is on the rise. Global Post. May 30, 2010. Available from: http://www.globalpost.com/print/%203695607. [Last accessed on 2011 May 31].
9. Miller DR. Publication fraud: Implications to the individual and to the specialty. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011;24:154-9.
10. Errami M, Garner H. A tale of two citations. Nature 2008;451:397-9. (Pubitemid 351158869)
11. Steen RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics 2011;37:249-53.
12. Kleinert S. Checking for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and text recycling. Lancet 2011;377:281.
13. The Fraud of Plagiarism. Available from: http://www.cte.usf.edu/ plagiarism.plag.html. [Last accessed on 2011 May 18].
14. Procedures for Alleged Academic Dishonesty or Disruption of Academic Process. Available from: http://www.ugs.usf.ed/catalogs/0809/adadap.htm. [Last accessed on 2011 May 18].
15. Bilic-Zulle L. Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing? Sci Eng Ethics 2008;14:139-47.
16. Strange K. Authorship: Why not just toss a coin? Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008;295:C567-75.
17. Wren JD, Kozak KZ, Johnson KR, Deakyne SJ, Schilling LM, Dellavalle RP. The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Rep 2007;8:988-91. (Pubitemid 350042329)