No clinical relevance of approved animal experiments after seventeen years

Altex

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 242-243

  Lindl, Toni ^a   Voelkel, Manfred ^b  

^a Institute of Applied Cell Culture   (Germany)

^b Ethical Commission on Animal Experimentation   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EMBASE; ETHICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; NONHUMAN; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARDIZATION;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMALS; GERMANY; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 80053503736     PISSN: 09467785     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (14)

1. Balls, M. (2010). The principles of humane experimental technique: Timeless insights and unheeded warnings. ALTEX 27, 144-148.
2. Dagg, A. I., and Seidle, T. K. (2004). Levels of citation of non-human animal studies conducted at a Canadian research hospital. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 7, 205-213. (Pubitemid 39433496)
3. Faggion, C. M. Jr, Schmitter, M., and Tu, Y. K. (2009). Assessment of replication of research evidence from animals to humans in studies on peri-implantitis therapy. J. Dent. 37, 737-747.
4. Foster, M., and Braddock, M. (2004). To guide the process. Part II: Animal models. Screening 3, 20-21.
5. Grant, J., Green, L., and Mason, B. (2003). From bedside to bench: Comroe and Dripps revisited. London: Brund University (HERG Research Report No. 30).
6. Gruber, F. P., and Hartung, T. (2004). Alternatives to animal experimentation in basic research. ALTEX 21, Suppl., 3-31. (Pubitemid 40074944)
7. Knight, A. (2007). Systematic reviews of animal experiments demonstrate poor human clinical and toxicological utility. ATLA 35, 641-659.
8. Knight, A. (2008). Non animal methodologies within biomedical research and toxicity testing. ALTEX 25, 213-231.
9. Lindl, T., Weichenmeier, I., Labahn, D., et al. (2001). Evaluation von beantragten und genehmigten tierexperimentellen Versuchsvorhaben in Bezug auf das Forschungsziel, den wissenschaftlichen Nutzen und die medizinische Relevanz (Evaluation of authorised experiments on laboratory animals with regard to the aim of the research to be carried out, its scientific usefulness and its medical relevance). ALTEX 18, 171-178.
10. Lindl, T., Voelkel, M., and Kolar, R. (2005). Tierversuche in der biomedizinischen Forschung. Eine Bestandsaufnahme der klinischen Relevanz von genehmigten Tierversuchsvorhaben [Animal experiments in biomedical research. An evaluation of the clinical relevance of approved animal experimental projects]. ALTEX 22, 143-151. (Pubitemid 41488982)
11. Plous, S., and Herzog, H. (2001). Animal research. Reliability of protocol reviews for animal research. Science 293, 608-609. (Pubitemid 32728647)
12. Pound, P., Ebrahim, S., Sandercock, P., et al. (2004). Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ 328, 514-517. (Pubitemid 38293622)
13. Reines, B. P. (1991). On the locus of medical discovery. J. Med. Philos. 16, 183-209.
14. Rieser, T. M. (2005). Urinary tract emergencies. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 35, 359-373.