Decoupling of rapid and adaptive evolution among seminal fluid proteins in heliconius butterflies with divergent mating systems

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2855-2871

  Walters, James R ^a,b   Harrison, Richard G ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accessory gland; Lepidoptera; Molecular evolution; Reproductive proteins; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

INSECT PROTEIN;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BUTTERFLY; DIVERGENCE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PROTEIN; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPERM;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; INSECT PROTEINS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; SEMEN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

HELICONIUS; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 80053446680     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01351.x     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Almeida, F. C., and R. DeSalle 2008. Evidence of adaptive evolution of accessory gland proteins in closely related species of the drosophila repleta group. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:2043-2053.
2. Almeida, F. C., and R. DeSalle 2009. Orthology, function and evolution of accessory gland proteins in the drosophila repleta group. Genetics 181:235-245.
3. Andres, J. A., L. S. Maroja, S. M. Bogdanowicz, W. J. Swanson, and R. G. Harrison 2006. Molecular evolution of seminal proteins in field crickets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1574-1584.
4. Anisimova, M., and C. Kosiol 2009. Investigating protein-coding sequence evolution with probabilistic codon substitution models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:255-271.
5. Anisimova, M., J. P. Bielawski, and Z. H. Yang 2001. Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1585-1592.
6. Baer, B., and J. J. Boomsma 2004. Male reproductive investment and queen mating-frequency in fungus-growing ants. Behav. Ecol. 15:426-432.
7. Beltran, M., C. D. Jiggins, A. V. Z. Brower, E. Bermingham, and J. Mallet 2007. Do pollen feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 92:221-239.
8. Bergstrom, J., and C. Wiklund 2002. Effects of size and nuptial gifts on butterfly reproduction: can females compensate for a smaller size through male-derived nutrients? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52:296-302.
9. Bissoondath, C. J., and C. Wiklund 1995. Protein-content of spermatophores in relation to monandry polyandry in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37:365-371.
10. Bissoondath, C. J., and C. Wiklund 1996. Male butterfly investment in successive ejaculates in relation to mating system. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39:285-292.
11. Boggs, C. L. 1979. Resource allocation and reproductive strategies in several heliconine butterfly species. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Texas, Austin
12. Boggs, C. L.. 1981. Selection pressures affecting male nutrient investment at mating in heliconiine butterflies. Evolution 35:931-940.
13. Boyko, A. R. 2005. The evolution of warning coloration in Heliconius butterflies. Ph.D. Thesis. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
14. Brower, A. V. Z., and M. G. Egan 1997. Cladistic analysis of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): a revised phylogenetic position for Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:969-977.
15. Brown, K. S. 1981. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26:427-456.
16. Cardoso, M. Z., J. J. Roper, and L. E. Gilbert 2009. Prenuptial agreements: mating frequency predicts gift-giving in Heliconius species. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 131:109-114.
17. Clark, N. L., and W. J. Swanson 2005. Pervasive adaptive evolution in primate seminal proteins. PLoS Genet. 1:e35.
18. Clark, N. L., J. E. Aagaard, and W. J. Swanson 2006. Evolution of reproductive proteins from animals and plants. Reproduction 131:11-22.
19. Colonello, N. A., and K. Hartfelder 2005. She's my girl - male accessory gland products and their function in the reproductive biology of social bees. Apidologie 36:231-244.
20. Dean, M. D., N. L. Clark, G. D. Findlay, R. C. Karn, X. Yi, W. J. Swanson, M. J. MacCoss, and M. W. Nachman 2009. Proteomics and comparative genomic investigations reveal heterogeneity in evolutionary rate of male reproductive proteins in mice (Mus domesticus). Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:1733-1743.
21. Deinert, E. L. 2003. Mate location and competition for mates in a pupal mating butterfly. Pp. 91-108 in L. C. Boggs, W. B. Watt, and P. R. Ehrlich, eds. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
22. Dorus, S., P. D. Evans, G. J. Wyckoff, S. S. Choi, and B. T. Lahn 2004. Rate of molecular evolution of the seminal protein gene SEMG2 correlates with levels of female promiscuity. Nat. Genet. 36:1326-1329.
23. Dorus, S., S. A. Busby, U. Gerike, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, and T. L. Karr 2006. Genomic and functional evolution of the Drosophila melanogaster sperm proteome. Nat.Genet. 38:1440-1445.
24. Dorus, S., Z. N. Freeman, E. R. Parker, B. D. Heath, and T. L. Karr 2008. Recent origins of sperm genes in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:2157-2166.
25. Dorus, S., E. R. Wasbrough, J. Busby, E. C. Wilkin, and T. L. Karr 2010. Sperm proteomics reveals intensified selection on mouse sperm membrane and acrosome genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:1235-1246.
26. Drummond, B. A. 1984. Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. Pp. 291-370 in Smith R. L. ed. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York
27. Edwards, S. V., L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:5936-5941.
28. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package). [3.6]. 2005. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
29. Findlay, G. D., and W. J. Swanson 2010. Proteomics enhances evolutionary and functional analysis of reproductive proteins. Bioessays 32:26-36.
30. Findlay, G. D., X. H. Yi, M. J. MacCoss, and W. J. Swanson 2008. Proteomics reveals novel drosophila seminal fluid proteins transferred at mating. Plos Biol. 6:1417-1426.
31. Findlay, G. D., M. J. MacCoss, and W. J. Swanson 2009. Proteomic discovery of previously unannotated, rapidly evolving seminal fluid genes in drosophila. Genome Res. 19:886-896.
32. Galicia, I., V. Sanchez, and C. Cordero 2008. On the function of signa, a genital trait of female Lepidoptera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101:786-793.
33. Gilbert, L. E. 2003. Adaptive noverlty through introgression in heliconius wing patters: evidence for a shared genetic "toolbox" from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. Pp. 281-318 in L. C. Boggs, W. B. Watt, and P. R. Ehrlich, eds. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
34. Gilbert, L. E.. 1991. Biodiversity of a Central American heliconius community: pattern, process, and problems. Pp. 403-427 in P. W. Price, T. M. Lewinsohn, G. W. Fernandes, and W. W. Benson, eds. Plant-animal interactions evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
35. Gilbert, L. E.. 1976. Postmating female odor in heliconius butterflies - male-contributed anti-aphrodisiac. Science 193:419-420.
36. Haerty, W., S. Jagadeeshan, R. J. Kulathinal, A. Wong, K. R. Ram, L. K. Sirot, L. Levesque, C. G. Artieri, M. F. Wolfner, A. Civetta, et al. 2007. Evolution in the fast lane: rapidly evolving sex-related genes in drosophila. Genetics 177:1321-1335.
37. Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. 41:95-98.
38. Herlyn, H., and H. Zischler 2007. Sequence evolution of the sperm ligand zonadhesin correlates negatively with body weight dimorphism in primates. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 61:289-298.
39. Herlyn, H., and H. Zischler 2008. The molecular evolution of sperm zonadhesin. Int. J. Develop. Biol. 52:781-790.
40. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
41. Hurle, B., W. Swanson, and E. D. Green 2007. Comparative sequence analyses reveal rapid and divergent evolutionary changes of the WFDC locus in the primate lineage. Genome Res. 17:276-286.
42. Jeffery, W. R. 2009. Regressive evolution in Astyanax cavefish. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43:25-47.
43. Jensen-Seaman, M. I., and W. H. Li 2003. Evolution of the hominoid semenogelin genes, the major proteins of ejaculated semen. J. Mol. Evol. 57:261-270.
44. Kingan, S. B., M. Tatar, and D. M. Rand 2003. Reduced polymorphism in the chimpanzee semen coagulating protein, semenogelin I. J. Mol. Evol. 57:159-169.
45. Lazzaro, B. P. 2008. Natural selection on the drosophila antimicrobial immune system. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11:284-289.
46. Maddison, W. P., and L. L. Knowles 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55:21-30.
47. Marshall, J. L., D. L. Huestis, C. Garcia, Y. Hiromasa, S. Wheeler, S. Noh, J. M. Tomich, and D. J. Howard 2011. Comparative proteomics uncovers the signature of natural selection acting on the ejaculate proteomes of two cricket species isolated by postmating, prezygotic phenotypes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:423-435.
48. Martin-Coello, J., H. Dopazo, L. Arbiza, J. Ausió, E. R. Roldan, and M. Gomendio 2009. Sexual selection drives weak positive selection in protamine genes and high promoter divergence, enhancing sperm competitiveness. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276:2427-2436.
49. Matz, M., N. Alieva, A. Chenchik, and S. Lukyanov 2003. Amplification of cDNA ends using PCR suppresion effect and step-out PCR. Pp. 41-50 in S. Y. Ying, ed. Generation of cDNA libraries. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
50. Mikheyev, A. S. 2004. Male accessory gland size and the evolutionary transition from single to multiple mating in the fungus-gardening ants. J. Insect Sci. 4:37.
51. Mitchell-Olds, T., M. Feder, and G. Wray 2008. Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Heredity 100:101-102.
52. Mueller, J. L., K. R. Ram, L. A. Mcgraw, M. C. B. Qazi, E. D. Siggia, A. G. Clark, C. F. Aquadro, and M. F. Wolfner 2005. Cross-species comparison of drosophila male accessory gland protein genes. Genetics 171:131-143.
53. Nadeau, N. J., T. Burke, and N. I. Mundy 2007. Evolution of an avian pigmentation gene correlates with a measure of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274:1807-1813.
54. O'Connor, T. D., and N. I. Mundy 2009. Genotype-phenotype associations: substitution models to detect evolutionary associations between phenotypic variables and genotypic evolutionary rate. Bioinformatics. 25:i94-100.
55. Posada, D., and T. R. Buckley 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53:793-808.
56. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2005. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
57. Ram, K. R., and M. F. Wolfner 2009. A network of interactions among seminal proteins underlies the long-term postmating response in drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:15384-15389.
58. Ram, K. R., and M. F. Wolfner 2007. Seminal influences: Drosophila Acps and the molecular interplay between males and females during reproduction. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47:427-445.
59. Ramm, S. A., P. L. Oliver, C. P. Ponting, P. Stockley, and R. D. Emes 2008. Sexual selection and the adaptive evolution of mammalian ejaculate proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:207-219.
60. Ramm, S. A., L. McDonald, J. L. Hurst, R. J. Beynon, and P. Stockley 2009. Comparative proteomics reveals evidence for evolutionary diversification of rodent seminal fluid and its functional significance in sperm competition. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:189-198.
61. Ravi Ram, K., L. K. Sirot, and M. F. Wolfner 2006. Predicted seminal astacin-like protease is required for processing of reproductive proteins in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:18674-18679.
62. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
63. Rozen, S., and Skaletsky H.J. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Pp. 365-386 in S. M. S. Krawetz, ed. Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
64. Scott, J. A. 1972. Mating of butterflies. J. Res. Lepidoptera 11:99-127.
65. Swanson, W. J., R. Nielsen, and Q. F. Yang 2003. Pervasive adaptive evolution in mammalian fertilization proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:18-20.
66. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier 1998. Concerted evolution in an egg receptor for a rapidly evolving abalone sperm protein. Science 281:710-712.
67. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier 2002a. Reproductive protein evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:161-179.
68. Swanson, W. J., and V. D. Vacquier 2002b. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:137-144.
69. Tennessen, J. A. 2005. Molecular evolution of animal antimicrobial peptides: widespread moderate positive selection. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1387-1394.
70. Turner, L. M., and H. E. Hoekstra 2008. Causes and consequences of the evolution of reproductive proteins. Int. J. Develop. Biol. 52:769-780.
71. Wagstaff, B. J., and D. J. Begun 2007. Adaptive evolution of recently duplicated accessory gland protein genes in desert drosophila. Genetics 177:1023-1030.
72. Wagstaff, B. J., and D. J. Begun 2005. Molecular population genetics of accessory gland protein genes and testis-expressed genes in Drosophila mojavensis and D-arizonae. Genetics 171:1083-1101.
73. Walters, J. R., and R. G. Harrison 2010. Combined EST and proteomic analysis identifies rapidly evolving seminal fluid proteins in Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:2000-2013.
74. Walters, J. R., and R. G. Harrison 2008. EST analysis of male accessory glands from Heliconius butterflies with divergent mating systems. BMC Genom. 9:592.
75. Wong, A. 2010. Testing the effects of mating system variation on rates of molecular evolution in primates. Evolution 64:2779-2785.
76. Yang, Z. H. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:568-573.
77. Yang, Z. H.. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-556.
78. Yang, Z. H., and J. P. Bielawski 2000. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:496-503.
79. Yang, Z. H., and R. Nielsen 2002. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:908-917.
80. Yang, Z. H., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A. M. K. Pedersen 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
81. Yang, Z. H., W. S. W. Wong, and R. Nielsen 2005. Bayes empirical Bayes inference of amino acid sites under positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1107-1118.
82. Zhang, J. Z., R. Nielsen, and Z. H. Yang 2005. Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:2472-2479.