Reconstructing the architecture of the ancestral amniote genome

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 19, 2011, Pages 2664-2671

  Ouangraoua, Aïda ^a   Tannier, Eric ^b   Chauve, Cedric ^c  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNIOTA; AVES; MAMMALIA; TELEOSTEI; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; CHROMOSOME; EVOLUTION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; GENOME; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SYNTENY; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIRDS; CHROMOSOMES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME; MAMMALS; SYNTENY; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 80053442046     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr461     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alekseyev, M. and Pevzner, P. (2009) Breakpoint graphs and ancestral genome reconstruction. Genome Res., 19, 943-957.
2. Backström, N. et al. (2008) Agene-based genetic linkage map of the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) reveals extensive synteny and gene-order conservation during 100 million years of avian evolution. Genetics, 179, 1479-1495.
3. Benton, M.J. and Donoghue, P.C.J. (2007) Paleontological evidence to date the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 26-53.
4. Bergeron, A. et al. (2004) Reconstructing ancestral gene orders using conserved intervals. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3240, 14-25.
5. Bertrand, D. et al. (2010) Reconstruction of ancestral genome subject to whole genome duplication, speciation, rearrangement and loss. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 6293, 78-89.
6. Booth, K. and Lueker, G. (1976) Testing for the consecutive ones property, interval graphs and graph planarity using PQ-tree algorithms. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 13, 335-379.
7. Bourque, G. et al. (2004) Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse and rat genomes. Genome Res., 14, 507-516.
8. Catchen, J. et al. (2008) Inferring ancestral gene order. In Keith, J. (ed.) Bioinformatics, Volume I: Data, analysis, and Evolution. Vol. 452. Humana Press, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 365-383.
9. Chauve, C. and Tannier, E. (2008) Amethodological framework for the reconstruction of contiguous regions of ancestral genomes and its application to mammalian genome. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000234.
10. Chauve, C. et al. (2010) Yeast ancestral genome reconstructions: the possibilities of computational methods II. J. Comput. Biol., 17, 1097-1112.
11. Consortium, I.C.G.S. (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature, 432, 695-716.
12. de Peer, Y.V. (2004) Computational approaches to unveiling ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 752-763.
13. Dietrich, F. et al. (2004) The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science, 304, 304-307.
14. Dobzhansky, T. and Sturtevant, A.H. (1938) Inversions in the chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 23, 28-64.
15. Durand, D. and Sankoff, D. (2003) Tests for gene clustering. J. Comput. Biol., 10, 453-482.
16. Ellegren, H. (2010) Evolutionay stasis: the stable chromosomes of birds. Trends Ecol. Evol., 25, 283-291.
17. Eriksen, N. (2007) Reversal and transposition medians. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 374, 111-126.
18. Faraut, T. (2008) Addressing chromosome evolution in the whole-genome sequence era. Chromosome Res., 16, 5-16.
19. Ferguson-Smith, M. and Trifonov, V. (2007) Mammalian karyotype evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet., 8, 950-962.
20. Froenicke, L. (2005) Origins of primate chromosomes - as delineated by zoo-fish and alignments of human and mouse draft genome sequences. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 108, 122-138.
21. Froenicke, L. et al. (2003) Towards the delineation of the ancestral eutherian genome organization: comparative genome maps of human and the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) generated by chromosome painting. Proc. R. Soc. London, 270, 1331-1340.
22. Gordon, J.L. et al. (2009) Additions, losses, and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genet., 5, e1000485.
23. Griffin, D. et al. (2007) The evolution of the avian genome as revealed by comparative molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 117, 64-77.
24. Griffin, D. et al. (2008) Whole genome comparative studies between chicken and turkey and their implications for avian genome evolution. BMC Genomics, 9, 168.
25. Hansson, B. et al. (2010). Avian genome evolution: insights from a linkage map of the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Heredity, 104, 67-78.
26. Hufton, A. and Panopoulou, G. (2009) Polyploidy and genome restructuring: a variety of outcomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 19, 600-606.
27. Jaillon, O. et al. (2004) Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyoty pe. Nature, 431, 946-957.
28. Kellis, M. et al. (2004) Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 428, 617-624.
29. Kemkemer, C. et al. (2009) Gene synteny comparison between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution. BMC Evol. Biol., 9, 84.
30. Kohn, M. et al. (2006) Reconstruction of a 450My-old ancestral vertebrate protokaryotype. Trends Genet., 22, 203-210.
31. Kumar, S. et al. (2001) Determination of the number of conserved chromosomal segments between species. Genetics, 157, 1387-1395.
32. Larkin, D. (2010) Role of chromosomal rearrangements and conserved chromosome regions in amniote evolution. Mol. Genet. Microbiol. Virol., 25, 1-7.
33. Luc, N. et al. (2003) Gene teams: a new formalization of gene clusters for comparative genomics. Comput. Biol. Chem., 27, 59-67.
34. Ma, J. et al. (2006) Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome. Genome Res., 16, 1557-1565.
35. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. (2007) Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences. Nature, 447, 167-177.
36. Miklos, I. and Tannier, E. (2010) Bayesian sampling of genome rearrangement scenarios via double cut and join. Bioinformatics, 26, 3012-3019.
37. Muffato, M. and Roest-Crollius, H. (2008) Paleogenomics, or the recovery of lost genomes from the mist of times. BioEssays, 30, 122-134.
38. Muffato, M. et al. (2010) Genomicus: a database and a browser to study gene synteny in modern and ancestral genomes. Bioinformatics, 26, 1119-1121.
39. Murphy, W. et al. (2005) Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science, 309, 613-617.
40. Nakatani, Y. et al. (2007) Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res., 17, 1254-1265.
41. Naruse, K. et al. (2004) A medaka gene map: The trace of ancestral vertebrate proto-chromosomes revealed by comparative gene mapping. Genome Res., 14, 820-828.
42. Ouangraoua, A. et al. (2009) Prediction of contiguous ancestral regions in the amniote ancestral genome. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 5542, 173-185.
43. Paten, B. et al. (2008) Enredo and pecan: genome-wide mammalian consistency-based multiple alignment with paralogs. Genome Res., 18, 1814-1828.
44. Pham, S.K. and Pevzner, P.A. (2010) DRIMM-Synteny: decomposing genomes into evolutionary conserved segments. Bioinformatics, 26, 2509-2516.
45. Putnam, N.H. et al. (2007) Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science, 317, 86-94.
46. Putnam, N. et al. (2008) The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature, 453, 1064-1071.
47. Rascol, V.L. et al. (2007) Ancestral animal genomes reconstruction. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 19, 542-546.
48. Richard, F. et al. (2003) Reconstruction of the ancestral karyotype of eutherian mammals. Chromosome Res., 11, 605-618.
49. Salse, J. et al. (2008) Identification and characterization of shared duplications between rice and wheat provide new insight into grass genome evolution. Plant Cell, 20, 11-24.
50. Salse, J. et al. (2009a) Improved criteria and comparative genomics tool provide new insights into grass paleogenomics. Brief. Bioinformatics, 10, 619-630.
51. Salse, J. et al. (2009b) Reconstruction of monocotelydoneous proto-chromosomes reveals faster evolution in plants than in animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 14908-14913.
52. Sémon, M. and Wolfe, K.H. (2007a) Consequences of genome duplication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 17, 505-512.
53. Sémon, M. and Wolfe, K.H. (2007b) Rearrangement rate following the whole-genome duplication in teleosts. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 860-867.
54. Sémon, M. and Wolfe, K.H. (2007c) Reciprocal gene loss between tetraodon and zebrafish after whole genome duplication in their ancestor. Trends Genet., 23, 108-112.
55. Skinner, B. et al. (2009) Comparative genomics in chicken and pekin duck using fish mapping and microarray analysis. BMC Genomics, 10, 357.
56. Stapley, J. et al. (2008) A linkage map of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata provides new insights into avian genome evolution. Genetics, 179, 651-657.
57. Vilella, A.J. et al. (2009) Ensembl compara genetrees: complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res., 19, 327-335.
58. Wienberg, J. (2004) The evolution of eutherian chromosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 14, 657-666.
59. Woods, I. et al. (2005) The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrates chromosomes. Genome Res., 15, 1307-1314.
60. Xu, W. et al. (2008) Poisson adjacency distributions in genome comparison: multichromosomal, circular, signed and unsigned cases. Bioinformatics, 24, i146-i152.
61. Yang, F. et al. (2003) Reciprocal chromsome painting among human, aardvark, and elephant (superorder afrotheria) reveals the likely eutherian ancestral karyotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 1062-1066.
62. Zhao, H. and Bourque, G. (2009) Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny. Genome Res., 19, 934-942.