Environmental niche modeling reveals climatic differences among breeding ranges of orchard oriole subspecies

American Midland Naturalist

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 404-414

  Martin, Michael D ^a   Omland, Kevin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING SITE; CLIMATE EFFECT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; MIGRATORY SPECIES; MUSEUM; NICHE; ORCHARD; PASSERINE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SUBSPECIES; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ICTERUS SPURIUS; ICTERUS SPURIUS SPURIUS;

EID: 80053431289     PISSN: 00030031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031-166.2.404     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BAKER, J., E. LOPEZ-MEDRANO, A. NAVARRO-SIGUENZA, O. ROJAS-SOTO AND K. OMLAND. 2003. Recent speciation in the orchard oriole group: Divergence of Icterus spurius spurius and Icterus spurius fuertesi. Auk, 120:848-859. (Pubitemid 37029536)
2. BLAKE, E. R. 1953. Birds of Mexico, a guide for field identification. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
3. CHAPMAN, F. 1911. Description of a New Oriole (Icterus fuertesi) from Mexico. Auk, 28:1-4.
4. DE QUEIROZ, K. 1998. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation: conceptual unification and terminological recommendations, p. 57-75. In: D. Howard and S. Berlocher (eds.). Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
5. -2005. A unified concept of species and its consequences for the future of taxonomy. Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci., 56:196-215.
6. EATON, M., J. SOBERÓN AND T. PETERSON. 2008. Phylogenetic perspective on ecological niche evolution in American blackbirds (Family Icteridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 94:869-878.
7. ELITH, J., C. H. GRAHAM, R. P. ANDERSON, M. DUDIK, S. FERRIER, A. GUISAN AND R. J. HIJMANS, ET AL. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29:129-151.
8. GOMULKIEWICZ, G. AND R. D. HOLT. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution, 49:201-207.
9. GRABER, R. AND R. GRABER. 1954. Comparative notes on Fuertes and Orchard Orioles. Condor, 56:274-282.
10. GRAHAM, A. 1993. Historical Factors and Biological Diversity. In: T. P. Ramamoorthy and R. Bye (eds.). Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
11. GRAHAM, C. H., S. R. RON, J. C. SANTOS, C. J. SCHNEIDER AND C. MORITZ. 2004. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution, 58:1781-1793. (Pubitemid 39151508)
12. HERNANDEZ, P., C. GRAHAM, L. MASTER AND D. ALBERT. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29:773-785. (Pubitemid 44630203)
13. HIJMANS, R., S. CAMERON, J. PARRA, P. JONES AND A. JARVIS. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol., 25:1965-1978. (Pubitemid 43013915)
14. HOFMANN, C., K. MCGRAW, T. CRONIN AND K. OMLAND. 2007. Melanin coloration in New World orioles I: carotenoid masking and pigment dichromatism in the orchard oriole complex. J. Avian Biol., 38:163-171. (Pubitemid 46340680)
15. HOWELL, S. N. G. AND S. WEBB. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
16. HUTCHINSON, G. E. 1957. Closing Remarks. Wiley, New York, New York.
17. -1978. An Introduction to Population Ecology. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
18. JARAMILLO, A. AND P. BURKE. 1999. New world blackbirds: the icterids. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
19. KIERE, L., C. HOFMANN, I. TRACY, T. CRONIN, J. LEIPS AND K. OMLAND. 2007. Using color to define species boundaries: Quantitative analysis in the orchard oriole complex supports the recognition of two species. Condor, 109:692-697. (Pubitemid 47359698)
20. KONDO, B., J. PETERS, B. ROSENSTEEL AND K. OMLAND. 2008. Coalescent analyses of multiple loci support a new route to speciation in birds. Evolution, 62:1182-1191. (Pubitemid 351623932)
21. LOBO, J. M., A. JIMENEZ-VALVERDE AND R. REAL. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 17:145-151. (Pubitemid 351228538)
22. LOSOS, J., M. LEAL, R. GLOR, K. DE QUEIROZ, P. HERTZ, L. SCHETTINO, A. LARA, T. JACKMAN AND A. LARSON. 2003. Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community. Nature, 424:542-545. (Pubitemid 36975773)
23. OMLAND, K. 1997. Examining two standard assumptions of ancestral reconstructions: repeated loss of dichromatism in dabbling ducks (Anatini). Evolution, 51:1636-1646. (Pubitemid 27491158)
24. PEARSON, R. G., C. J. RAXWORTHY, M. NAKAMURA AND A. T. PETERSON. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr., 34:102-117. (Pubitemid 44952533)
25. PETERSON, A., J. SOBERÓN AND V. SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science, 285:1265-1267. (Pubitemid 29398613)
26. PHILLIPS, S. J., R. P. ANDERSON AND R. E. SCHAPIRE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model., 190:231-259. (Pubitemid 41680650)
27. ROHWER, S., K. HOBSON AND V. ROHWER. 2009. Migratory double breeding in Neotropical migrant birds. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106:19050-19055.
28. WARREN, D. L., R. E. GLOR AND M. TURELLI. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution, 62:2868-2883.
29. WIECZOREK, J., Q. GUO AND R. HIJMANS. 2004. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 18:745-767. (Pubitemid 39587944)
30. WISZ, M., R. HIJMANS, J. LI, A. PETERSON, C. GRAHAM AND A. GUISAN. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib., 14:763-773.