The role of epistemic communities in the 'makability' of MERCOSUR

The EU and World Regionalism: The Makability of Regions in the 21st Century

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 171-185

  Botto, Mercedes Isabel ^a  

^a FLACSO CONICET   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053419631     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Botto, M. and Bianculli, A. 2007. The Impact of Research in Trade Policy in the Southern Cone: The Construction of the Capital Goods Protocol and the Common External Tariff within Mercosur. Paper to the Research & Policy Workshop organized by LATN, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2. CEPAL 1994. El Regionalismo Abierto en América Latina y el Caribe. La Integración Económica en Servicio de la Transformación Productiva con Equidad. Santiago: CEPAL.
3. Faust, J. 2002. The European Union's Trade Policy towards MERCOSUR. Working Paper PEIF, No. 7, Mainz, November.
4. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. 2001. Taking stock: The constructivist research in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391-416.
5. Giordano, P. 2007. El Estado Actual de las Negociaciones Comerciales Agrícolas en América Latina. Presentation for the IADB, Integration and Regional Programmes Department Washington, DC, 6-8 June.
6. Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R.O. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. New York: Cornell University Press.
7. Haas, P.M. 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.
8. Jordana, J. and Levi Faur, D. 2007. Professional networks, institutional design and global governance. Revista Integración y Comercio, (26)133, 125-49.
9. Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
10. Korzeniewicz, R.P. and Smith, W.C. 2003. Redes transnacionales de la sociedad civil, in El ALCA y las Cumbres de las Américas: & Una Nueva Relación Público-Privado?, edited by D. Tussie and M. Botto. Buenos Aires: Biblos, 47-75.
11. Niño, J. 2004. What determines Trade Regimes and Reforms? The Role of Ideas and Democracy. Paper made for the London School for Economics, Universidad de Colombia.
12. Robert, M. 2007. Trade institutions: an intricate web of arrangements, in Governing the Americas. Assessing Multilateral Institutions, edited by G. Mace, J.-P. Thrien and P. Haslam. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
13. Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (eds) 1993. Policy Change and Learning. An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
14. Sánchez Bajo, C. 1999. The European Union and MERCOSUR: a case of interregionalism. Third World Quarterly, 20(5), 927-41.
15. St. Clair, A.L. 2006. The World Bank as a transnational expertise institution. Global Governance, 12(1), 77-95.
16. Teichman, J.A. 2001. The Politics of Freeing Markets in Latin America: Chile, Argentina, and Mexico. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
17. Torrent, R. and Molinuevo, M. 2004. Beyond trade in EU-MERCOSUR relations: towards a new model of North-South agreements, in Implementing an EU- MERCOSUR Agreement. Non-Trade Issues, edited by A.G.A. Valladão and P. Guerrieri. Chaire MERCOSUR de Sciences Po, Working Group on EU- MERCOSUR Negotiations. Research Program.
18. Yeats, A.J. 1998. Does MERCOSUR's trade performance raise concerns about the effects of regional trade arrangements? World Bank Economic Review, 12(1), 1-28.