Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries

General Dentistry

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 136-144

  Tracy, Kyle D ^a,b   Dykstra, Bradley A ^c   Gakenheimer, David C ^d   Scheetz, James P ^b   Lacina, Stephanie ^c   Scarfe, William C ^c   Farman, Allan G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^c Department of Radiology and Imaging Science ^*  (United States)

^d LCD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STANDARD; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; VIDEORECORDING;

DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOFTWARE; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 80053417378     PISSN: 03636771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. White SC, Yoon DC. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radio! 1997, 26(1):32-38. (Pubitemid 127495003)
2. Upiichard KK, Potter BJ, Russell CM, Schafei TE, Adair S, Weller RN. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Pediatt Dent 2000, 22(1):9-15.
3. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: A comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29(5):312-318.
4. Nair MK, Nair UP. An in-vitruo evaluation of Kodak Insight and Eklaspeed Plus film compared with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Caries Res 2001;35(5):354-359. (Pubitemid 33643775)
5. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dertomaxiltofac Radiol 2002;31(3):170-175. (Pubitemid 38998474)
6. Abreu M Jr, Mol A, Ludlow JB. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kocak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal canes detection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Ended 2001;91(3):381-385. (Pubitemid 33608862)
7. Han WJ. A comparison of film and 3 digital imaging systems for natural denial caries detection: CCD, CMOS, P5P. and film. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2004;34:1-6
8. Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Caplan D. Proximal canes detection; Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Eklaspeed Plus Gen Dent 2005;53(1):43-48. (Pubitemid 40326767)
9. Schulre AG, Wiitchen A, Stachniss V. Jacquet W, Bottenberg P. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: Interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections. Caries Res 2008;42(1):57-61.
10. Hinne H. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(2):78-82.
11. Castro V M, Katz JO, Hardman PK, Glaros A G, Spencer P. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36(3):138-142. (Pubitemid 46999155)
12. Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkayrak B. In vitro comparison of four different dental x-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. Oper Dent 2007;32(5):504-509.
13. Yoon DC, Wilensky GD, Neuhaus JA, Manukian N, Gakenheimer DC. Quantitative dental caries detection system and method. U. S. patent 5, 742, 700. April 21.1998, Washington, D. C.: U. S. Patent Office.
14. U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Summary of safety and effectiveness data: log con Caries Detector, PMA Mo. 980025. Sept. 1998. Available at: www.fda.gov/cdrh/pma/pmasep98.html.
15. Gakenheimer DC. The efficacy of a computerized canes detector in intraoral digital radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 2002:133(7):883-890.
16. Wenzel A, Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: Consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement. Caries Res 2001;35(1):12-20. (Pubitemid 33640898)
17. Wenzel A, Hintre H, Kold KM, Kold S. Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110(3):199-203.
18. Gakenheimer DC. Computer-automated caries detection tools: A big payoff is possible when user judgment is combined with the tool. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111(2):179-181 (Pubitemid 37467786)
19. National Institutes of Health. Diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout fife: NIH consensus statement. 2001:18(1):1-24
20. Horowilz AM. A report on the NIH Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life, J Dent Res 2004;83 Spec No C: C15-C17.
21. Pitts NB. Modem concepts of caries measurement. J Dent Res 2004:83 Spec No C: C43-C47.
22. Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential. Computer Med Imag Graph 2007;31(4-5):198-211. (Pubitemid 46601790)
23. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
24. Dei K. Personal communication concerning verification of normals in medical radiology. Chicago, IL; September 21, 2009.
25. Li F, Aoyarna M. Shiraislii J, Abe H, Li O. Suzuki K, Engelmann R, Seme S, MacMahon H, Doi K. Radiologists' performance for differentiatiig benign from malignant lung nodules on highresolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183(5):1209-1218.
26. Li F, Arimura H, Suzuki K, Sftiraishi J, Li Q, Abe H, Engelmann R, Sone S, MacMahon H, Doi K. Computer-aided delection of peripheral lung cancers missed al CT: ROC analyses without and with localization. Radiology 2005;237(2):684-690. (Pubitemid 41507913)