Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: Interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections

Caries Research

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-61

  Schulte, A G ^a   Wittchen, A ^b   Stachniss, V ^b   Jacquet, W ^c   Bottenberg, P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Accuracy of caries diagnosis; Approximal caries diagnosis; Digital radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARIES; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

BICUSPID; DATA COMPRESSION; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 38349112037     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000112219     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Benediktsdottir IS, Hintze H, Petersen JK, Wenzel A: Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:39-44.
2. Downer MC: Concurrent validity of an epidemiological diagnostic system for caries with the histological appearance of extracted teeth as validation criterion. Caries Res 1975; 9:231-246.
3. Erten H, Akarslan ZZ, Topuz O: The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int 2005;36:65-70.
4. Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ: Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions. Caries Res 2001;35:193-199.
5. Hintze H: Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:78-82.
6. Hintze H, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A: Influence of number of surfaces and observers on statistical power in a multiobserver ROC radio-graphic caries detection study. Caries Res 2003;37:200-205.
7. Hintze H, Wenzel A: Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:44-49.
8. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M: Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:170-175.
9. Hopcraft MS, Morgan MV: Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:212-218.
10. Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H: Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems. Caries Res 2004;38:34-38.
11. Kalsbeek H, Truln GJ, van Rossum GMJM, van Rijkom HM, Poorterman JHG, Verrips GH: Trends in caries prevalence in Dutch adults between 1983 and 1995. Caries Res 1998;32: 160-165.
12. Kidd EA, Naylor MN, Wilson RF: Prevalence of clinically undetected and untreated molar occlusal dentine caries in adolescents on the Isle of Wight. Caries Res 1992;26:397-401.
13. Lee ML, Rosner B: The average area under correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: a nonparametric approach based on generalized two-sample Wilcoxon statistics. Appl Stat 2001;50:337-344.
14. Nair MK, Nair UP: An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus Film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Caries Res 2001;35:354-359.
15. Otis LL, Sherman RG: Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:323-330.
16. Pabla T, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Abreu M: Effect of data compression on proximal caries detection: observer performance with DenOptix photostimulable phosphor images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:45-49.
17. Pitts NB: Diagnostic tools and measurements -Impact on appropriate care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:24-35.
18. Rosner B, Grove D: Use of the Mann-Whitney U test for clustered data. Stat Med 1999; 18: 1387-1400.
19. Schröder HE: Orale Strukturbiologie, ed 3. Stuttgart, Thieme, 1976, p 113.
20. Schulze RKW, Nackat D, d'Hoedt B: In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;7:529-534.
21. Yalcinkaya S, Künzel A, Willers R, Thomas M, Becker J: Subjective image quality of digital-ly filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:643-651.