Parser combination by reparsing

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Short Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 129-132

  Sagae, Kenji ^a   Lavie, Alon ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ACCURACY LEVEL; STATE OF THE ART;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85119974562     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Allen, J. (1995). Natural Language Understanding (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.
2. Bikel, D. (2002). Design of a multi-lingual, parallel-processing statistical parsing engine. In Proceedings of HLT2002. San Diego, CA.
3. Charniak, E., & Johnson, M. (2005). Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Ann Arbor, MI.
4. Chu, Y. J., & Liu, T. H. (1965). On the shortest arborescence of a directed graph. Science Sinica(14), 1396-1400.
5. Edmonds, J. (1967). Optimum branchings. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards(71B), 233-240.
6. Eisner, J. (1996). Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96). Copenhagen, Denmark.
7. Henderson, J. (2004). Discriminative training of a neural network statistical parser. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain.
8. Henderson, J., & Brill, E. (1999). Exploiting diversity in natural language processing: combining parsers. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).
9. Marcus, M. P., Santorini, B., & Marcinkiewics, M. A. (1993). Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19.
10. McDonald, R., Pereira, F., Ribarov, K., & Hajic, J. (2005). Non-Projective Dependency Parsing using Spanning Tree Algorithms. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technologies/Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT-EMNLP). Vancouver, Canada.
11. Nivre, J., & Scholz, M. (2004). Deterministic dependency parsing of English text. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 64-70). Geneva, Switzerland.
12. Sagae, K., & Lavie, A. (2005). A classifier-based parser with linear run-time complexity. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Vancouver, Canada.
13. Yamada, H., & Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Statistical dependency analysis using support vector machines. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Nancy, France.
14. Zeman, D., & Žabokrtský, Z. (2005). Improving Parsing Accuracy by Combining Diverse Dependency Parsers. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Parsing Technologies. Vancouver, Canada.