Mixture surrogate models based on Dempster-Shafer theory for global optimization problems

Journal of Global Optimization

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 79-104

  Müller, Juliane ^a   Piché, Robert ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Dempster Shafer theory; Global optimization; Mixture surrogate models; Response surface

Indexed keywords

DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY; GLOBAL MINIMA; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; GLOBALOPTIMUM; OPTIMIZATION TEST PROBLEMS; RESPONSE SURFACE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SURROGATE MODEL; VARIABLE DOMAIN;

ALGORITHMS; FORMAL LOGIC; FUEL ADDITIVES; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 80053308339     PISSN: 09255001     EISSN: 15732916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-010-9620-y     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Appel, M.J., Labarre, R., Radulović, D.: On accelerated random search. SIAM J. Optim. 14708-14731 (2003)
2. M. Björkman K. Holmström 2001 Global optimization of costly nonconvex functions using radial basis functions Optim. Eng. 1 373 397 10.1023/A:1011584207202
3. Currin, C., Mitchell, T., Morris M., Ylvisaker, D.: A bayesian approach to the design and analysis of computer experiments. Technical report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (1988)
4. A.P. Dempster 1968 A generalization of bayesian inference J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B 30 205 247
5. Duchon J.: Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables. Springer, Berlin (1977)
6. J.H. Friedman 1991 Multivariate adaptive regresion splines Ann. Stat. 19 1 141 10.1214/aos/1176347963
7. B. Glaz P.P. Friedmann L. Liu 2008 Surrogate based optimization of helicopter rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 35 341 363 10.1007/s00158-007-0137-z (Pubitemid 351334010)
8. T. Goel R.T. Haftka W. Shyy N.V. Queipo 2007 Ensemble of surrogates Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 33 199 216 10.1007/s00158-006-0051-9 (Pubitemid 46198778)
9. K. Holmström 2008 An adaptive radial basis algorithm (ARBF) for expensive black-box global optimization J. Glob. Optim. 41 447 464 10.1007/s10898-007-9256-8
10. T. Inagaki 1991 Interdependence between safety-control policy and multiple-sensor schemes via Dempster-Shafer theory IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40 182 188 10.1109/24.87125 (Pubitemid 21675722)
11. D.R. Jones 2001 A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces J. Glob. Optim. 21 345 383 10.1023/A:1012771025575 (Pubitemid 33672374)
12. D.R. Jones M. Schonlau W.J. Welch 1998 Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions J. Glob. Optim. 13 455 492 10.1023/A:1008306431147 (Pubitemid 128507405)
13. X.B. Lam Y.S. Kim A.D. Hoang C.W. Park 2009 Coupled aerostructural design optimization using the kriging model and integrated multiobjective optimization algorithm J. Optim. Theory Appl. 10.1007/s10957-009-9520-9
14. X. Liao Q. Li X. Yang W. Zhang W. Li 2008 Multiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 35 561 569 10.1007/s00158-007-0163-x
15. Lopheven, S.N., Nielsen, H.B., Søndergaard, J.: DACE a matlab kriging toolbox. Technical report, Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12 (2002)
16. MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 281-297. University of California Press, California (1967)
17. J.D. Martin T.W. Simpson 2005 Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models AIAA J. 43 853 863 10.2514/1.8650 (Pubitemid 40611902)
18. G. Matheron 1963 Principles of geostatistics Econ. Geol. 58 1246 1266 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
19. R.C. Morgans A.C. Zander C.H. Hansen D.J. Murphy 2008 EGO shape optimization of horn-loaded loudspeakers Optim. Eng. 9 361 374 10.1007/s11081-007-9029-8
20. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C.: Response Surface Methodology, Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. Wiley, London (1995)
21. Powell, M.J.D.: The Theory of Radial Basis Function Approximation in 1990. Advances in Numerical Analysis, vol. 2: wavelets, subdivision algorithms and radial basis functions, pp. 105-210. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1992)
22. Powell, M.J.D.: Recent Research at Cambridge on Radial Basis Functions. New Developments in Approximation Theory, pp. 215-232. Birkhäuser, Basel (1999)
23. N.V. Queipo R.T Haftka W. Shyy T. Goel R. Vaidyanathan P.K. Tucker 2005 Surrogate-based analysis and optimization Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41 1 28 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001 (Pubitemid 40537187)
24. R.G. Regis C.A. Shoemaker 2005 Constrained global optimization of expensive black box functions using radial basis functions J. Glob. Optim. 31 153 171 10.1007/s10898-004-0570-0 (Pubitemid 40608865)
25. R.G. Regis C.A. Shoemaker 2007 Improved strategies for radial basis function methods for global optimization J. Glob. Optim. 37 113 135 10.1007/s10898-006-9040-1 (Pubitemid 44876771)
26. Shafer G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
27. Smarandache, F., Dezert, J.: Information fusion based on new proportional conflict redistribution rules. In: 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, pp. 907-914. (2005) (Pubitemid 46276305)
28. Viana, F.A.C., Haftka, R.T.: Using multiple surrogates for minimization of the RMS error in metamodeling. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference DETC2008-49240 (2008)
29. R.R. Yager 1987 On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules Inf. Sci. 41 93 137 10.1016/0020-0255(87)90007-7 (Pubitemid 17583474)
30. R.J. Yang N. Wang C.H. Tho J.P. Bobineau B.P. Wang 2005 Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation J. Mech. Des. 127 1014 1021 10.1115/1.1906264 (Pubitemid 41250125)
31. L.A. Zadeh 1984 Review of book: a mathematical theory of evidence AI Mag. 5 81 83
32. Zhu, P., Zhang, Y., Chen, G.-L.: Metamodel-based lightweight design of an automotive front-body structure using robust optimization. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering (2009). doi: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO1045