Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping

Animal Communication Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 38-62

  Dabelsteen, Torben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927011553     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610363.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Balsby, T. J. S. 2000. Song activity and variability in relation to male quality and female choice in whitethroats Sylvia communis. Journal of Avian Biology, 31, 56–62.
2. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T. 2001. The meaning of song repertoire size and song length to male whitethroats Sylvia communis. Behavioural Processes, 56, 75–84.
3. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T.2002. Female behaviour affects male courtship in whitethroats, Sylvia communis. An interactive experiment using visual and acoustic cues. Animal Behaviour, 63, 251–257.
4. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T. 2003a. Male singing behaviour and female presence in the territory in whitethroats. Acta Ethologica, 5, 81–88.
5. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T. 2003b. Male calling between courtship sequences in whitethroats: a way to counter intrusions from neighbouring rivals. Behavioural Processes, 63, 149–157.
6. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T. 2003c. Degradation of whitethroat Sylvia communis song: implications for song flight and communication network activities. Behaviour, 140, 695–719.
7. Balsby, T. J. S. & Dabelsteen, T. 2004. Simulated courtship interactions elicit neighbour intrusions in the whitethroat Sylvia communis. Animal Behaviour, in press.
8. Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. 1992. Evidence for active female choice in a polygynous warbler. Animal Behaviour, 44, 301–311.
9. Blumenrath, S. H., Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B. 2004. Being inside nest boxes: does it complicate the receiving conditions for great tit Parus major females? Bioacoustics, in press.
10. Bower, J. L. 2000. Acoustic interactions during naturally occurring territorial conflict in a song sparrow neighborhood. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
11. Brumm, H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 434–440.
12. Brumm, H. & Todt, D. 2002. Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Animal Behaviour, 63, 891–897.
13. Brumm, H. & Todt, D.2003. Facing the rival: directional singing behaviour in nightingales. Behaviour, 140, 43–53.
14. Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1998. The Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
15. Dabelsteen, T. 1984. An analysis of the full song of the blackbird Turdus merula with respect to message coding and adaptations for acoustic communication. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 227–239.
16. Dabelsteen, T.1985. Messages and meanings of bird song with special reference to the blackbird (Turdus merula) and some methodology problems. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter, 25, 173–208.
17. Dabelsteen, T.1988. The meaning of the full song of the blackbird, Turdus merula, to untreated and oestradiol-treated females. Ornis Scandinavica, 19, 7–16.
18. Dabelsteen, T.1992. Interactive playback: a finely tuned response. In: Playback and Studies of Animal Communication, ed. P. K. McGregor. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 92–109.
19. Dabelsteen, T. & Mathevon, N. 2002. Why do songbirds sing intensively at dawn? A test of the acoustic transmission hypothesis. Acta Ethologica, 4, 65–72.
20. Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B. 1990. Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Animal Behaviour, 40, 1158–1168.
21. Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B.1992. Song features essential for species discrimination and behaviour assessment by male blackbirds (Turdus merula). Behaviour, 121, 259–287.
22. Dabelsteen, T., Larsen, O. N. & Pedersen, S. B. 1993. Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2206–2220.
23. Dabelsteen, T., McGregor, P. K., Holland, J., Tobias, J. & Pedersen, S. B. 1997. The signal value of overlapping singing in male robins (Erithacus rubecula). Animal Behaviour, 53, 249–256.
24. Dabelsteen, T., McGregor, P. K., Lampe, H. M., Langmore, N. E. & Holland, J. 1998. Quiet singing in song birds: an overlooked phenomenon. Bioacoustics, 9, 89–105.
25. Davies, N. B. 1992. Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Doutrelant, C. & McGregor, P. K. 2000. Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour, 137, 1655–1659.
27. Dukas, R. & Kamil, A. C. 2001. Limited attention: the constraint underlying search image. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 192–199.
28. Embleton, T. F. W. 1996. Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 31–48.
29. Ficken, M. S., Ficken, R. W. & Witkin, S. R. 1978. Vocal repertoire of the black-capped chickadee. The Auk, 95, 34–48.
30. Fléron, G. M. W. 2003. Stille sang hos solsorten, Turdus merula. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Copenhagen.
31. Gompertz, T. 1961. The vocabulary of the great tit. British Birds, 54, 369–394, 409–418.
32. Henwood, K. & Fabric, A. 1979. A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimisation. American Naturalist, 114, 260–274.
33. Hoi, H. 1997. Assessment of the quality of copulation partners in the monogamous bearded tit. Animal Behaviour, 53, 277–286.
34. Holland, J., Dabelsteen, T., Pedersen, S. B. & Larsen, O. N. 1998. Degradation of wren Troglodytes troglodytes song: implications for information transfer and ranging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2154–2166.
35. Holland, J., Dabelsteen, T., Pedersen, S. B. & Paris, A. L. 2001. Potential ranging cues contained within the energetic pauses of transmitted wren song. Bioacoustics, 12, 3–20.
36. Hovi, M., Alatalo, R. V. & Siikamäki, P. 1995. Black grouse leks on ice: female mate sampling by incitation of male competition? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 283–288.
37. Jakobsson, S., Brick, O. & Kullberg, C. 1995. Escalated fighting behaviour incurs increased predation risk. Animal Behaviour, 49, 137–142.
38. Lack, D. 1939. The display of the blackcock. British Birds, 32, 290–303.
39. Lack, D. 1940. Observations on captive robins. British Birds, 33, 262–270.
40. Langemann, U., Tavares, J. P., Peake, T. M. & McGregor, P. K. 2000. Responses of great tits to escalating patterns of playback. Behaviour, 137, 451–471.
41. Larsen, O. N. & Dabelsteen, T. 1990. Directionality of blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study. Ornis Scandinavica, 21, 37–45.
42. Lengagne, T. & Slater, P. J. B. 2002. The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 2121–2125.
43. Lind, H., Dabelsteen, T. & McGregor, P. K. 1996. Female great tits can identify mates by song. Animal Behaviour, 25, 667–671.
44. Lombard, E. 1911. Le signe de l’élévation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de l’Oreille et du Larynx, 37, 101–119.
45. Mathevon, N., Dabelsteen, T. & Blumenrath, S. H. 2004. Are high perches in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla song or listening posts? A sound transmission study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, in press.
46. McGregor, P. K. 1993. Signalling in territorial systems: a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Philosophical Transactions of the. Royal Society of London, Series B, 340, 237–244.
47. McGregor, P. K. & Dabelsteen, T. 1996. Communication networks. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, ed. D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 409–425.
48. McGregor, P. K., Dabelsteen, T. & Holland, J. 1997. Eavesdropping in a territorial songbird communication network: preliminary results. Bioacoustics, 8, 253–254.
49. McGregor, P. K., Peake, T. M. & Lampe, H. M. 2001. Fighting fish Betta splendens extract relative information from apparent interactions: what happens when what you see isn’t what you get? Animal Behaviour, 62, 1059–1065.
50. Mennill, D. J., Ratcliffe, L. M. & Boag, P. T. 2002. Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science, 296, 873.
51. Messmer, E. & Messmer, I. 1956. Die Entwicklung der Lautäusserungen und einiger Verhaltensweisen der Amsel (Turdus m. merula L.) unter natürlichen Bedingungen und nach Einzelaufzucht in schalldichten Räumen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 13, 341–441.
52. Michelsen, A. 1978. Sound reception in different environments. In: Sensory Ecology, ed. M. A. Ali. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 345–373.
53. Molles, L. E. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001. Neighbor recognition by resident males in the banded wren, Thryothorus pleurostictus, a tropical songbird with high song type sharing. Animal Behaviour, 61, 119–127.
54. Montgomerie, R. & Thornhill, R. 1989. Fertility advertisement in birds: a means of inciting male–male competition? Ethology, 81, 209–220.
55. Naguib, M. & Todt, D. 1997. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Animal Behaviour, 54, 1535–1543.
56. Naguib, M., Fichtel, C. & Todt, D. 1999. Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 537–542.
57. Nemeth, E., Winkler, H. & Dabelsteen, T. 2001. Differential degradation of antbird songs in a Neotropical rainforest: adaptation to perch height? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 3263–3274.
58. Oliveira, R. F., McGregor, P. K. & Latruffe, C. 1998. Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecifics interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265, 1045–1049.
59. Otter, K. A., McGregor, P. K., Terry, A. M. R. et al. 1999. Do female great tits Parus major assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 1305–1309
60. Peake, T. M., Terry, A. M. R., McGregor, P. K. & Dabelsteen, T. 2001. Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 1183–1187.
61. Peake, T. M., Terry, A. M. R., McGregor, P. K. & Dabelsteen, T. 2002. Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 1925–1929.
62. Poesel, A., Dabelsteen, T. & Pedersen, S. B. 2001. Making yourself heard: a study of masking effects on blue tit Parus caeruleus singing interactions. In Proceedings of the XVIII International BioAcoustics Conference, p. 12.
63. Rasmussen, R. & Dabelsteen, T. 2001. Song repertoires and repertoire sharing in a local group of blackbirds. Bioacoustics, 13, 63–76.
64. Sæther, S. A. 2002. Female calls in lek-mating birds: indirect mate choice, female competition for mates, or direct mate choice? Behavioral Ecology, 13, 344–352.
65. Schmitz, S., Dabelsteen, T. & Mathevon, N. 2000. High perches in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla: song posts or listening posts? In Proceedings of the 8th International Behavioral Ecology Congress, p. 175.
66. Searcy, W. A. & Yasukawa, K. 1996. Song and female choice. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, ed. D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 454–473.
67. Snow, D. W. 1958. A Study of Blackbirds. London: Allen and Unwin.
68. Stoddard, P. K. 1996. Vocal recognition of neighbours by territorial passerines. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds, ed. D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 356–374.
69. Stork, H.-J. 1971. Zur socialen Funktion des Gesanges der Amsel Turdus merula L. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 28, 54–58.
70. Thorpe, W. H. & Pilcher, P. M. 1959. The nature and characteristics of sub-song. British Birds, 51, 509–514.
71. Titus, R. C. 1998. Short-range and long-range songs: use of two acoustically distinct song classes by dark-eyed juncos. The Auk, 115, 386–393.
72. Wempen, J. 1986. Outdoor sound propagation close to the ground. In: Sound Propagation in Forested Areas and Shelterbeds, ed. M. J. M. Martens. Nijmegen: Faculty of Sciences, Catholic University, Nijmegen, pp. 83–106.
73. Wiley, R. H. & Poston, J. 1996. Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution, 50, 1371–1380.
74. Wiley, R. H. & Richards, D. G. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: transmission and signal detection. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 1, ed. D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller. New York: Academic Press, pp. 131–181.