Reproductive isolation in the wood cricket Gryllus vernalis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

Ethology

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 87-96

  Jang, Yikweon ^a,b   Bockhorst, Amanda ^a   Carl Gerhardt, Howard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; CALLING BEHAVIOR; CRICKET; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; MATING BEHAVIOR; NATURAL SELECTION; RELATEDNESS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG; SYMPATRY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLUS; GRYLLUS FULTONI; ORTHOPTERA;

EID: 33846334826     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01304.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adamo, S. A. & Hoy, R. R. 1994: Mating behaviour of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus and its dependence on social and environmental cues. Anim. Behav. 47, 857-868.
2. Alexander, R. D. 1956: A comparative study of sound production in insects, with special reference to the singing Orthoptera and Cicadidae of the eastern United States. PhD Dissertation. Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio, USA.
3. Alexander, R. D. 1957: The taxonomy of the field crickets of the eastern United States (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Acheta). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 50, 584-602.
4. Alexander, R. D. 1961: Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behavior in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17, 130-223.
5. Alexander, R. D. 1962: Evolutionary change in cricket acoustical communication. Evolution 16, 443-467.
6. Alexander, R. D. 1968: Life cycle origins, speciation, and related phenomena in crickets. Q. Rev. Biol. 43, 1-41.
7. Alexander, R. D., Marshall, D. C. & Cooley, J. R. 1997: Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids (Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J., eds). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK, pp. 4-31.
8. Balakrishnan, R. & Pollack, G. S. 1996: Recognition of courtship song in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Anim. Behav. 51, 353-366.
9. Balakrishnan, R. & Pollack, G. S. 1997: The role of antennal sensory cues in females responses to courting males in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 511-522.
10. Benedix, J. H. Jr & Howard, D. J. 1991: Calling song displacement in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45, 1751-1759.
11. Blair, W. F. 1955: Mating call and stage of speciation in the Microhyla oliveacea- M. carolinensis complex. Evolution 9, 469-480.
12. Brown, W. L. & Wilson, E. O. 1956: Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5, 49-64.
13. Doherty, J. & Hoy, R. 1985: Communication in insects. III. The auditory behavior of crickets: some views of genetic coupling, song recognition, and predator detection. Q. Rev. Biol. 60, 457-472.
14. Fitzpatrick, M. J. & Gray, D. A. 2001: Divergence between the courtship songs of the field crickets Gryllus texensis and Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ethology 107, 1075-1085.
15. Gerhardt, H. C. 1978: Temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray tree frog Hyla versicolor. Science 199, 992-994.
16. Gerhardt, H. C. 1994: Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47, 959-969.
17. Gerhardt, H. C. & Huber, F. 2002: Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18. Gray, D. A. 2005: Does courtship behavior contribute to species-level reproductive isolation in field crickets? Behav. Ecol. 16, 201-206.
19. Gray, D. A. & Cade, W. H. 2000: Sexual selection speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 14449-14454.
20. Hedrick, A. V., Perez, D., Lichti, N. & Yew, J. 2002: Temperature preferences of male field crickets (Gryllus integer) alter their mating calls. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 799-805.
21. Hill, K. G., Loftus-Hills, J. J. & Gartside, D. F. 1972: Premating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 20, 153-163.
22. Huang, Y., Ortí, G., Sutherlin, M., Duhachek, A. & Zerd, A. 2000: Phylogenetic relationship of North American field crickets inferred from mitochondrial DNA data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 48-57.
23. Huber, F. & Thorson, J. 1985: Cricket auditory communication. Sci. Am. 253, 60-68.
24. Jang, Y. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2006a: Divergence in the calling songs between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Evol. Biol. 19, 459-472.
25. Jang, Y. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2006b: Divergence in female calling song discrimination between sympatric and allopatric populations of the southern wood cricket Gryllus fultoni (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60, 150-158.
26. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., Counterman, B. A. & Noor, M. A. F. 2004: The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. Plos Biol. 2, 2256-2263.
27. Pires, A. & Hoy, R. R. 1992a: Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. I. Field and laboratory studies of temperature effects on calling song production and recognition in Gryllus firmus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 69-78.
28. Pires, A. & Hoy, R. R. 1992b: Temperature coupling in cricket acoustic communication. II. Localization of temperature effects on song production and recognition networks in Gryllus firmus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 171, 79-92.
29. Rundle, H. D. & Schluter, D. 1998: Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52, 200-208.
30. Servedio, M. R. & Noor, M. A. F. 2003: The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34, 339-364.
31. Shaw, K. L. & Herlihy, D. P. 2000: Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 577-584.
32. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.
33. Stout, J. F. & McGhee, R. 1988: Attractiveness of the male Acheta domestica calling song to females. II. The relative importance of syllable period, intensity, and chirp rate. J. Comp. Physiol. A 164, 277-287.
34. Stout, J. F., DeHaan, D. H. & McGhee, R. W. 1983: Attractiveness of the male Acheta domesticus calling song to females. I. Dependence on each of the calling song features. J. Comp. Physiol. A 153, 509-521.
35. Thorson, J., Weber, T. & Huber, F. 1982: Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling song recognition in Gryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J. Comp. Physiol. 146, 361-378.
36. Wagner, W. E. Jr & Reiser, M. G. 2000: The importance of calling song and courtship song in female mate choice in the variable field cricket. Anim. Behav. 59, 1219-1226.
37. Walker, T. J. 1962: Factors responsible for intraspecific variation in the calling songs of crickets. Evolution 16, 407-428.
38. Weber, T. & Thorson, J. 1988: Auditory behavior of the cricket. IV. Interaction of direction of tracking with perceived temporal pattern in split-song paradigms. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163, 13-22.