Knowledge combination in graphical multiagent models

Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 145-152

  Duong, Quang ^a   Wellman, Michael P ^a   Singh, Satinder ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT BEHAVIOR; ARBITRARY DISTRIBUTION; COMBINATION METHOD; COMBINED MODEL; JOINT DISTRIBUTIONS; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; MULTI-AGENT MODEL; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE;

LAKES; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053245537     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Daskalakis, C. and Papadimitriou, C. H. (2006). Computing pure Nash equilibria in graphical games via Markov random fields. In Seventh ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 91-99, Ann Arbor. (Pubitemid 44393628)
2. Gal, Y. and Pfeffer, A. (2008). Networks of influence diagrams: A formalism for reasoning about agents' decision-making processes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.
3. Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E. (2007). Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(477):359-378.
4. Jaakkola, T., Singh, S., and Jordan, M. I. (1995). Reinforcement learning algorithm for partially observable Markov decision problems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, pages 345-352.
5. Kappen, H. J. and Rodríguez, F. B. (1997). Mean field approach to learning in Boltzmann machines. Pattern Recognition Letters, 18:1317-1322. (Pubitemid 127433094)
6. Kearns, M. (2002). Computational game theory: A tutorial. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mkearns/nips02tutorial/nips.pdf. Presented at the Neural In-formation Processing Systems conference.
7. Kearns, M. (2007). Graphical games. In Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., and Vazirani, V. V., editors, Algorithmic Game Theory, pages 159-180. Cambridge University Press.
8. Kearns, M., Littman, M. L., and Singh, S. (2001). Graphical models for game theory. In Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 253-260, Seattle.
9. Koller, D. and Milch, B. (2003). Multi-agent influence diagrams for representing and solving games. Games and Economic Behavior, 45:181-221. (Pubitemid 37194965)
10. Krebs, V. (2002). Internet industry partnerships. http://www.orgnet.com/ netindustry.html.
11. Pennock, D. M. and Wellman, M. P. (2005). Graphical models for groups: Belief aggregation and risk sharing. Decision Analysis, 2:148-164.
12. Vorobeychik, Y. and Wellman, M. P. (2006). Mechanism design based on beliefs about responsive play (positionpaper). In ACM EC-06 Workshop on Alternative Solution Concepts for Mechanism Design, Ann Arbor, MI.
13. Wolpert, D. H. (2006). Information theory: The bridge connecting bounded rational game theory and statistical physics. In Complex Engineered Systems. Springer.
14. Yedidia, J. S., Freeman, W. T., and Weiss, Y. (2001). Generalized belief propagation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13:689-695.