All-cause mortality after first ERCP in England: Clinically guided analysis of hospital episode statistics with linkage to registry of death

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 825-833

  Bodger, Keith ^a,b   Bowering, Katherine ^a,b   Sarkar, Sanchoy ^a   Thompson, Elizabeth ^a   Pearson, Michael G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AINTREE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMORBIDITY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GALLSTONE; GENDER; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEOPLASM; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SEPTICEMIA; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAUSE OF DEATH; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; ENGLAND; EPISODE OF CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 80053224894     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. National Institutes of Health NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy NIH Consens State Sci Statements 19 2002 1 26
2. A. Andriulli, S. Loperfido, and G. Napolitano Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 1781 1788 (Pubitemid 47206695)
3. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) Scoping our practice http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2004report/ 2004 Accessed October 1, 2010
4. Endoscopy Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology Quality and safety indicators for endoscopy (2007/8) http://www.bsg.org.uk/attachments/ 170-bsg-grs-indic07.pdf 1-8-2010 Accessed October 1, 2010
5. E.J. Williams, S. Taylor, and P. Fairclough Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice Gut 56 2007 821 829 (Pubitemid 46854199)
6. S. O'Sullivan, C. Crippen, and T. Ponich Are patients informed when they consent to ERCP? Can J Gastroenterol 16 2002 154 158 (Pubitemid 34546288)
7. E.J. Williams, A. Hamlyn, and R.F. Logan Consenting patients for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a survey of 182 UK endoscopists and 2059 of their patients Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21 2009 1351 1357
8. P.B. Cotton Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits; mainly about indications Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 378 382 (Pubitemid 43261459)
9. R. Lilford, and P. Pronovost Using hospital mortality rates to judge hospital performance: a bad idea that just won't go away BMJ 340 2010 c2016
10. A. Bottle, and P. Aylin Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study BMJ 332 2006 947 951
11. M. Filipovic, V. Seagroatt, and M.J. Goldacre Differences between women and men in surgical treatment and case fatality rates for ruptured aortic abdominal aneurysm in England Br J Surg 94 2007 1096 1099 (Pubitemid 350082854)
12. B. Jarman, S. Gault, and B. Alves Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data BMJ 318 1999 1515 1520 (Pubitemid 29255794)
13. P. Aylin, A. Bottle, and A. Majeed Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models BMJ 334 2007 1044
14. M.A. Mohammed, J.J. Deeks, and A. Girling Evidence of methodological bias in hospital standardised mortality ratios: retrospective database study of English hospitals BMJ 338 2009 b780
15. J. Nicholl Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy J Epidemiol Community Health 61 2007 1010 1013 (Pubitemid 350032599)
16. The Information Centre for Health and Social Care Hospital Episode Statistics 2010 http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk Accessed October 1, 2010
17. V. Sundararajan, H. Quan, and P. Halfon Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index Med Care 45 2007 1210 1215
18. K. Bodger, K. Bowering, and S. Sarkar All-cause mortality following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in England: analysis of hospital episode statistics linked to death registration data Gut 58 suppl 1 2009 A34
19. Association of Public Health Observatories Analytical tools for public health: Funnel plot for proportions and percentages http://www.apho.org.uk/ resource/item.aspx?RID=47241 Accessed October 1, 2010
20. P.B. Cotton, D.A. Garrow, and J. Gallagher Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years Gastrointest Endosc 70 2009 80 88
21. L. Enochsson, F. Swahn, and U. Arnelo Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP Gastrointest Endosc 72 2010 1175 1184
22. S.E. Campbell, M.K. Campbell, and J.M. Grimshaw A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy J Public Health Med 23 2001 205 211 (Pubitemid 32895888)
23. M.C. Allison, D.N. Ramanaden, and M.G. Fouweather Provision of ERCP services and training in the United Kingdom Endoscopy 32 2000 693 699
24. S. Varadarajulu, M.L. Kilgore, and C.M. Wilcox Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes Gastrointest Endosc 64 2006 338 347 (Pubitemid 44233560)
25. P.B. Cotton Evaluating ERCP is important but difficult Gut 51 2002 287 289 (Pubitemid 34791464)