|
Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 154-158
|
Are patients informed when they consent to ERCP?
|
Author keywords
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Informed consent; Litigation
|
Indexed keywords
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
ALLERGIC REACTION;
ARTICLE;
BLEEDING;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DATA BASE;
DEATH;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
GASTROENTEROLOGY;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICAL LIABILITY;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
PANCREATITIS;
PATIENT INFORMATION;
PERFORATION;
POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLISHING;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
SELF REPORT;
STANDARD;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
UNITED KINGDOM;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
|
EID: 0036107465
PISSN: 08357900
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(08)83639-6 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (16)
|