Latent vector weighting for word meaning in context

EMNLP 2011 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1012-1022

  Van De Cruys, Tim ^a   Poibeau, Thierry ^b   Korhonen, Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT-WORD; DEPENDENCY RELATION; FACTORIZATION MODEL; FEATURE VECTORS; LATENT VECTORS; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; WINDOW-BASED; WORD MEANING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FACE RECOGNITION; FACTORIZATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053223080     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Eneko Agirre, David Martínez, Oier López de Lacalle, and Aitor Soroa. 2006. Two graph-based algorithms for state-of-the-art wsd. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) Conference, pages 585-593, Sydney, Australia.
2. Marco Baroni, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi, and Eros Zanchetta. 2009. The wacky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(3):209-226.
3. Chris Ding, Tao Li, and Wei Peng. 2008. On the equivalence between non-negative matrix factorization and probabilistic latent semantic indexing. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(8):3913-3927.
4. Georgiana Dinu and Mirella Lapata. 2010. Measuring distributional similarity in context. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1162-1172, Cambridge, MA, October.
5. Katrin Erk and Diana McCarthy. 2009. Graded word sense assignment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 440-449, Suntec, Singapore.
6. Katrin Erk and Sebastian Padó. 2008. A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 897-906, Waikiki, Hawaii, USA.
7. Katrin Erk and Sebastian Padó. 2009. Paraphrase assessment in structured vector space: Exploring parameters and datasets. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, pages 57-65, Athens, Greece.
8. Katrin Erk and Sebastian Padó. 2010. Exemplar-based models for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers, pages 92-97, Uppsala, Sweden.
9. Katrin Erk, Diana McCarthy, and Nicholas Gaylord. 2009. Investigations on word senses and word usages. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 10-18.
10. Katrin Erk. 2010. What is word meaning, really? (and how can distributional models help us describe it?). In Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on GEometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics, pages 17-26.
11. Eric Gaussier and Cyril Goutte. 2005. Relation between PLSA and NMF and implications. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 601-602, Salvador, Brazil.
12. Claudio Giuliano, Alfio Gliozzo, and Carlo Strapparava. 2007. Fbk-irst: Lexical substitution task exploiting domain and syntagmatic coherence. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pages 145-148.
13. Zellig S. Harris. 1954. Distributional structure. Word, 10(23):146-162.
14. Eduard Hovy, Mitchell Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance Ramshaw, and Ralph Weischedel. 2006. Ontonotes: the 90% solution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, pages 57-60, New York, New York, USA.
15. Nancy Ide and Yorick Wilks. 2006. Making Sense About Sense. In Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms And Applications, chapter 3. Springer, Dordrecht.
16. Kazuaki Kishida. 2005. Property of average precision and its generalization: An examination of evaluation indicator for information retrieval experiments. Technical report, National Institute of Informatics.
17. Thomas Landauer and Susan Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychology Review, 104:211-240.
18. Thomas Landauer, Peter Foltz, and Darrell Laham. 1998. An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25:295-284.
19. Daniel D. Lee and H. Sebastian Seung. 2000. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, pages 556-562.
20. Dekang Lin. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), Volume 2, pages 768-774, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
21. Diana McCarthy and Roberto Navigli. 2007. SemEval-2007 task 10: English lexical substitution task. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 48-53.
22. Diana McCarthy and Roberto Navigli. 2009. The English lexical substitution task. Language resources and evaluation, 43(2):139-159.
23. Jeff Mitchell and Mirella Lapata. 2008. Vector-based models of semantic composition. proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 236-244.
24. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of LREC-2006, pages 2216-2219.
25. Sebastian Padó and Mirella Lapata. 2007. Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2):161-199.
26. Patrick Pantel and Dekang Lin. 2002. Discovering word senses from text. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 613-619, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
27. Hinrich Schütze. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):97-123.
28. Stefan Thater, Georgiana Dinu, and Manfred Pinkal. 2009. Ranking paraphrases in context. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Applied Textual Inference, pages 44-47, Suntec, Singapore.
29. Stefan Thater, Hagen Fürstenau, and Manfred Pinkal. 2010. Contextualizing semantic representations using syntactically enriched vector models. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 948-957, Uppsala, Sweden.
30. Kristina Toutanova and Christopher D. Manning. 2000. Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (EMNLP/VLC-2000), pages 63-70.
31. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pages 252-259.
32. Tim Van de Cruys. 2008. Using three way data for word sense discrimination. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), pages 929-936, Manchester.
33. Eric Villemonte de La Clergerie. 2010. Building factorized TAGs with meta-grammars. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+10), pages 111-118, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
34. Alexander Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics, pages 947-953, Saarbrücken, Germany.
35. Deniz Yuret. 2007. Ku: Word sense disambiguation by substitution. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pages 207-213.