Discovering word senses from text

Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 613-619

  Pantel, Patrick ^a   Lin, Dekang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clustering; Evaluation; Machine learning; Word sense discovery

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHM; DISTRIBUTIONAL HYPOTHESIS; ESTIMATOR; WORD SENSES;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 0242540413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/775107.775138     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Cutting, D. R.; Karger, D.; Pedersen, J.; and Turkey, J. W. 1992. Scatter/Gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In Proceedings of SIGI - 2. pp. 318-329. Copenhagen, Denmark.
2. Guha, S.; Rastogi, R.; and Kyuseok, S. 1999. ROCK: A robust clustering algorithm for categorical attributes. In Proceedings of ICD. pp. 512-521. Sydney, Australia.
3. Harris, Z. 1985. Distributional structure. In: Katz, J. J. (ed.) The Philosophy of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 26-47.
4. Hindle, D. 1990. Noun classification from predicate-argument structures. In Proceedings of C - 0. pp. 268-275. Pittsburgh, PA.
5. Hutchins, J. and Sommers, H. 1992. Introduction to Machine Translation. Academic Press.
6. Jain, A. K.; Murty, M. N.; and Flynn, P. J. 1999. Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Surveys 31(3):264-323.
7. Karypis, G.; Han, E.-H.; and Kumar, V. Chameleon: A hierarchical clustering algorithm using dynamic modeling. I Computer Special Issue on Data Analysis and Mining 32(8):68-75.
8. Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104:211-240.
9. Landes, S.; Leacock, C.; and Tengi, R. I. 1998. Building semantic concordances. In WordNet in Electronic Lexical Database, edited by C. Fellbaum. pp. 199-216, MIT Press.
10. Lin, D. 1994. Principar - an efficient, broad-coverage, principle-based parser. Proceedings of C I G- pp. 42-48. Kyoto, Japan.
11. Lin, D. 1997. Using syntactic dependency as local context to resolve word sense ambiguity. In Proceedings of C - . pp. 64-71. Madrid, Spain.
12. Lin, D. 1998. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. Proceedings of C I G C - . pp. 768-774. Montreal, Canada.
13. Lin, D. and Pantel, P. 2001. Induction of semantic classes from natural language text. In Proceedings of SIGKDD-01. pp. 317-322. San Francisco, CA.
14. Manning, C. D. and Schütze, H. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press.
15. Miller, G. WordNet: An online lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 1990.
16. Pasca, M. and Harabagiu, S. 2001. The informative role of WordNet in Open-Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of C -01 Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources. pp. 138-143. Pittsburgh, PA.
17. Salton, G. and McGill, M. J. 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill.
18. Shaw Jr., W. M.; Burgin, R.; and Howell, P. Performance standards and evaluations in IR test collections: Cluster-based retrieval methods. Information Processing and Management 33:1-14, 1997.
19. Steinbach, M.; Karypis, G.; and Kumar, V. 2000. A comparison of document clustering techniques. Technical Report 00-0. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota.
20. Voorhees, E. M. 1998. Using WordNet for text retrieval. In WordNet and Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 285-303. MIT Press.