Anywhere, any-time binary instrumentation

ACM SIGPLAN/SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 9-16

  Bernat, Andrew R ^a   Miller, Barton P ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary instrumentation; Binary rewriting; Dynamic instrumentation

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; BASIC BLOCKS; BINARY INSTRUMENTATIONS; BINARY REWRITING; CONTROL FLOWS; DYNAMIC INSTRUMENTATION; DYNINST; GRAPH TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUES; LOW OVERHEAD;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 80053209171     PISSN: 00189162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2024569.2024572     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A. R. Bernat, K. Roundy, and B. P. Miller. Effcient, sensitivity resistant binary instrumentation. In International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), Toronto, CA, July 2011.
2. D. Bruening, T. Garnett, and S. Amarasinghe. An infrastructure for adaptive dynamic optimization. In Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (CGO), San Francisco, CA, March 2003.
3. B. Buck and J. Hollingsworth. An API for runtime code patching. Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 14(4):317-329, Winter 2000.
4. B. De Bus, B. De Sutter, L. Van Put, D. Chanet, and K. De Bosschere. Link-time optimization of arm binaries. In 2004 ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools, pages 211-220, Jun 2004.
5. W. Drewry and T. Ormandy. Flayer: exposing application internals. In Workshop on Offensive Technologies (WOOT), Boston, MA, USA, August 2007.
6. A. Eustace and A. Srivastava. ATOM: A exible interface for building high performance program analysis tools. In USENIX Technical Conference, New Orleans, LA, January 1995.
7. R. Heckel. Graph transformation in a nutshell. In Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., pages 187-198. Elsevier, 2006. (Pubitemid 43121243)
8. M. Laurenzano, M. Tikir, L. Carrington, and A. Snavely. PEBIL: Effcient static binary instrumentation for linux. In International Symposium for Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS), White Plains, NY, 2010.
9. C.-K. Luk, R. Cohn, R. Muth, H. Patil, A. Klauser, G. Lowney, S. Wallace, V. J. Reddi, and K. Hazelwood. Pin: building customized program analysis tools with dynamic instrumentation. In Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), pages 190-200, Chicago, IL, USA, June 2005.
10. A. Moser, C. Kruegel, and E. Kirda. Exploring multiple execution paths for malware analysis. In Security and Privacy (SP), Oakland, CA, USA, May 2007.
11. S. Nanda, W. Li, L.-C. Lam, and T. cker Chiueh. Bird: Binary interpretation using runtime disassembly. In International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (CGO 2006), pages 358-370, New York, NY, 2006.
12. N. Nethercote and J. Seward. Valgrind: A framework for heavyweight dynamic binary instrumentation. In Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI), San Diego, CA, USA, June 2007.
13. J. Newsome, D. Brumley, D. Song, J. Chamcham, and X. Kovah. Vulnerability-specific execution filtering for exploit prevention on commodity software. In Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium (NDSS), San Diego, CA, USA, February 2006.
14. M. Olszewski, J. Cutler, and J. Steffan. Judostm: A dynamic binary-rewriting approach to software transactional memory. In Parallel Architecture and Compilation Techniques, pages 365-375, Brasov, Romania, 2007.
15. Open Speedshop. Open speedshop performance tool. February 2011.
16. K. A. Roundy and B. Miller. Hybrid analysis and control of malware binaries. In Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID), Ottawa, Canada, September 2010.
17. S. Shende and A. D. Malony. The TAU parallel performance system. Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 20(2):287-311, Summer 2006.