Comparison of complication rates of porous anophthalmic orbital implants

Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 434-440

  Ramey, Nicholas ^a   Gupta, Divakar ^a   Price, Kristina ^a   Husain, Amina ^a   Richard, Michael ^a   Woodward, Julie ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYETHYLENE; POLYGLACTIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; ORBIT IMPLANT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DURAPATITE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; EYE ENUCLEATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; POLYETHYLENES; POLYGLACTIN 910; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053195531     PISSN: 15428877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20110812-03     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Mules P. Evisceration of the globe, with artificial vitreous. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1885;5:200-206.
2. Chalasani R, Poole-Warren L, Conway RM, Ben-Nissan B. Porous orbital implants in enucleation: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52:145-155. (Pubitemid 46367857)
3. Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:274-280. (Pubitemid 38971780)
4. Hornblass A, Biesman BS, Eviatar JA. Current techniques of enucleation: a survey of 5,439 intraorbital implants and a review of the literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;11:77-86.
5. Sadiq SA, Mengher LS, Lowry J, Downes R. Integrated orbital implants: a comparison of hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants. Orbit. 2008;27:37-40. (Pubitemid 351322882)
6. Remulla HD, Rubin PA, Shore JW, et al. Complications of porous spherical orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:586-593.
7. Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, White WL, Shore JW. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:364-371. (Pubitemid 37175451)
8. Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, Lee SY. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:566-572.e2.
9. Shoamanesh A, Pang NK, Oestreicher JH. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements. Orbit. 2007;26:173-182. (Pubitemid 47463789)
10. Fahim DK, Frueh BR, Musch DC, Nelson CC. Complications of pegged and non-pegged hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:206-210. (Pubitemid 46801957)
11. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Rawlings N, Robinson J. An infected porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:413-415. (Pubitemid 47442786)
12. Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM, Dutton JJ, Wong A, Mawn L. The bioceramic implant: evaluation of implant exposures in 419 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:80-82.
13. Wang JK, Lai PC, Liao SL. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:162-170.e1.
14. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:128-135. (Pubitemid 36348967)
15. Tabatabaee Z, Mazloumi M, Taher Rajabi M, et al. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:114-118.
16. Li T, Shen J, Duffy MT. Exposure rates of wrapped and unwrapped orbital implants following enucleation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:431-435. (Pubitemid 33116895)
17. Wang JK, Liao SL, Lai PC, Lin LL. Prevention of exposure of porous orbital implants following enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:61-67.
18. Wang JK, Liao SL, Lin LL, Kao SC, Tseng HS. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:109-116.
19. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Bawazeer A. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:69-74. (Pubitemid 38120810)
20. Buettner H, Bartley GB. Tissue breakdown and exposure associated with orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:669-673.
21. Kostick DA, Linberg JV. Evisceration with hydroxyapatite implant: surgical technique and review of 31 case reports. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1542-1548.
22. Nakra T, Simon GJ, Douglas RS, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Comparing outcomes of enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2270-2275. (Pubitemid 44838920)
23. Oestreicher JH, Liu E, Berkowitz M. Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:324-329. (Pubitemid 27088111)
24. Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:53-61. (Pubitemid 36125720)
25. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Porous implant exposure: Incidence, management, and morbidity. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:1-7. (Pubitemid 46146888)
26. Jordan DR. Polyglactin mesh wrapping of hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:221-223. (Pubitemid 32467277)