Porous Orbital Implants in Enucleation: A Systematic Review

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 145-155

  Chalasani, Rajeev ^a   Poole Warren, Laura ^a   Conway, R Max ^b   Ben Nissan, Besim ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

aluminium oxide; enucleation; hydroxyapatite; motility; pegging; porous orbital implants; porous polyethylene; wrapping

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMATERIAL; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYETHYLENE; ROSEOLIC ACID;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; DEVICE; ENUCLEATION; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MORPHOLOGY; ORBIT IMPLANT; POROSITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DURAPATITE; EYE ENUCLEATION; EYE, ARTIFICIAL; HUMANS; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; POLYETHYLENE; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;

EID: 33847607496     PISSN: 00396257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.12.007     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Anderson R.L., Yen M.T., Lucci L.M., and Caruso R.T. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 18 (2002) 50-55
2. Bigham W.J., Stanley P., Cahill J.M., et al. Fibrovascular ingrowth in porous ocular implants: the effect of material composition, porosity, growth factors, and coatings. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15 (1999) 317-325
3. Blaydon S.M., Shepler T.R., Neuhaus R.W., et al. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19 (2003) 364-371
4. Cepela M., and Teske S. Orbital implants. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 7 (1996) 38-42
5. Christel P.S. Biocompatibility of surgical-grade dense polycrystalline alumina. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1992) 10-18
6. Christmas N.J., Gordon C.D., Murray T.G., et al. Intraorbital implants after enucleation and their complications: a 10-year review. Arch Ophthalmol 116 (1998) 1199-1203
7. Colen T.P., Paridaens D.A., Lemij H.G., et al. Comparison of artificial eye amplitudes with acrylic and hydroxyapatite spherical enucleation implants. Ophthalmology 107 (2000) 1889-1894
8. Custer P.L. Enucleation: past, present, and future. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16 (2000) 316-321
9. Custer P.L., Kennedy R.H., Woog J.J., et al. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 2054-2061
10. Custer P.L., Trinkaus K.M., and Fornoff J. Comparative motility of hydroxyapatite and alloplastic enucleation implants. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 513-516
11. Cyster L.A., Grant D.M., Howdle S.M., et al. The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 697-702
12. DeBacker C.M., Dutton J.J., Proia A.D., et al. Bovine pericardium versus homologous sclera as wrapping materials for hydroxyapatite ocular implants: an animal study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15 (1999) 312-316
13. Dutton J.J. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 370-377
14. Edelstein C., Shields C.L., De Potter P., et al. Complications of motility peg placement for the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 1616-1621
15. Fan J.T., and Robertson D.M. Long-term follow-up of the Allen implant. 1967 to 1991. Ophthalmology 102 (1995) 510-516
16. Gayre G.S., Lipham W., and Dutton J.J. A comparison of rates of fibrovascular ingrowth in wrapped versus unwrapped hydroxyapatite spheres in a rabbit model. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 18 (2002) 275-280
17. Goldberg R.A., Dresner S.C., Braslow R.A., et al. Animal model of porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10 (1994) 104-109
18. Guillinta P., Vasani S.N., Granet D.B., et al. Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19 (2003) 119-122
19. Habibovic P., Yuan H., van der Valk C.M., et al. 3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 3565-3575
20. Haruguchi H., and Teraoka S. Intimal hyperplasia and hemodynamic factors in arterial bypass and arteriovenous grafts: a review. J Artif Organs 6 (2003) 227-235
21. Hing K.A., Best S.M., Tanner K.E., et al. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res A 68 (2004) 187-200
22. Hornblass A., Biesman B.S., and Eviatar J.A. Current techniques of enucleation: a survey of 5,439 intraorbital implants and a review of the literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 11 (1995) 77-86 discussion 87-8
23. Iordanidou V., and De Potter P. Porous polyethylene orbital implant in the pediatric population. Am J Ophthalmol 138 (2004) 425-429
24. Jordan D.R., Brownstein S., Gilberg S., et al. Hydroxyapatite and calcium phosphate coatings on aluminium oxide orbital implants. Can J Ophthalmol 37 (2002) 7-13
25. Jordan D.R., Chan S., Mawn L., et al. Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology 106 (1999) 505-512
26. Jordan D.R., Gilberg S., and Bawazeer A. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20 (2004) 69-74
27. Jordan D.R., Gilberg S., Mawn L., et al. The synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: a report on 65 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14 (1998) 250-255
28. Jordan D.R., Gilberg S., and Mawn L.A. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19 (2003) 128-135
29. Jordan D.R., Hwang I., Brownstein S., et al. The Molteno M-Sphere. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16 (2000) 356-362
30. Jordan D.R., Mawn L.A., Brownstein S., et al. The bioceramic orbital implant: a new generation of porous implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16 (2000) 347-355
31. Jordan D.R., Munro S.M., Brownstein S., et al. A synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: the so-called counterfeit implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14 (1998) 244-249
32. Josset Y., Oum'Hamed Z., Zarrinpour A., et al. In vitro reactions of human osteoblasts in culture with zirconia and alumina ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 47 (1999) 481-493
33. Kaltreider S.A., and Newman S.A. Prevention and management of complications associated with the hydroxyapatite implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 12 (1996) 18-31
34. Kao S.C., and Chen S. The use of rectus abdominis sheath for wrapping of the hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30 (1999) 69-71
35. Karesh J.W., and Dresner S.C. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant. Ophthalmology 101 (1994) 1688-1695 discussion 1695-6
36. Konttinen Y.T., Zhao D., Beklen A., et al. The microenvironment around total hip replacement prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 16 (2005) 28-38
37. Lin C.J., Liao S.L., Jou J.R., et al. Complications of motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 86 (2002) 394-396
38. Long J.A., Tann T.M., Bearden W.H., et al. Enucleation: is wrapping the implant necessary for optimal motility?. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19 (2003) 194-197
39. Mawn L.A., Jordan D.R., and Gilberg S. Scanning electron microscopic examination of porous orbital implants. Can J Ophthalmol 33 (1998) 203-209
40. Misiek D.J., Kent J.N., and Carr R.F. Soft tissue responses to hydroxylapatite particles of different shapes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 (1984) 150-160
41. Moshfeghi D.M., Moshfeghi A.A., and Finger P.T. Enucleation. Surv Ophthalmol 44 (2000) 277-301
42. Mules P.H. Evisceration of the globe, with artificial vitreous. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 5 (1885) 200-206
43. Nagase M., Nishiya H., and Abe Y. The effect of crystallinity on hydroxyapatite-induced production of reactive oxygen metabolites by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. FEBS Lett 325 (1993) 247-250
44. Nunery W.R., Cepela M.A., Heinz G.W., et al. Extrusion rate of silicone spherical anophthalmic socket implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 9 (1993) 90-95
45. Nunery W.R., Heinz G.W., Bonnin J.M., et al. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: histopathologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 9 (1993) 96-104
46. Oestreicher J.H. Treatment of exposed coral implant after failed scleral patch graft. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10 (1994) 110-113
47. Oxley H.R., Corkhill P.H., Fitton J.H., et al. Macroporous hydrogels for biomedical applications: methodology and morphology. Biomaterials 14 (1993) 1064-1072
48. Perry A.C., et al. Advances in enucleation. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 4 (1991) 173-182
49. Perry A.C. Integrated orbital implants. Adv Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 8 (1990) 75-81
50. Perry J.D., Goldberg R.A., McCann J.D., et al. Bovine hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a preliminary report. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 18 (2002) 268-274
51. Piecuch J.F. Extraskeletal implantation of a porous hydroxyapatite ceramic. J Dent Res 61 (1982) 1458-1460
52. Rosen H.M., and McFarland M.M. The biologic behavior of hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 85 (1990) 718-723
53. Rubin PA, Green JP, Kent C, Shore JW: MEDPOR motility coupling post: primary placement in humans. Paper presented at the American Society of Oculoplastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California, USA 1997:
54. Rubin P.A., Popham J.K., Bilyk J.R., et al. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10 (1994) 96-103
55. Sagoo M.S., and Olver J.M. Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure. Br J Ophthalmol 88 (2004) 942-946
56. Schellini S.A., Marques M.E., Padovani C.R., et al. Comparison of synthetic hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants in eviscerated rabbit eyes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19 (2003) 136-139
57. Shields C.L., Shields J.A., Eagle R.C., et al. Histopathologic evidence of fibrovascular ingrowth four weeks after placement of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol 111 (1991) 363-366
58. Shields J.A., Shields C.L., and De Potter P. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant after enucleation-experience with 200 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 68 (1993) 1191-1195
59. Soparkar C.N., and Patrinely J.R. Tarsal patch-flap for orbital implant exposure. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14 (1998) 391-397
60. Su G.W., and Yen M.T. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 20 (2004) 274-280
61. Suter A.J., Molteno A.C., Bevin T.H., et al. Long term follow up of bone derived hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 86 (2002) 1287-1292
62. Tawfik H.A., and Dutton J.J. Primary peg placement in evisceration with the spherical porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1401-1406
63. Trichopoulas N., and Ausburger J.J. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 21 (2005) 331-336
64. Tyers A.G., and Collin J.R. Baseball orbital implants: a review of 39 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 69 (1985) 438-442
65. Van Acker E., and De Potter P. [Porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant. Prospective study of 75 primary implantations]. J Fr Ophtalmol 24 (2001) 1067-1073
66. Wellisz T., and Wallace R.D. Porous polyethylene and its biocompatibility. In: Terino E.O., and Flowers R.S. (Eds). The Art Of Alloplastic Facial Contouring (2000), Mosby, St Louis 261-272 chap 18