Sharing research tools in academia: The case of Japan

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 649-659

  Shibayama, Sotaro ^a   Baba, Yasunori ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ACCESSIBILITY; CAPITALISM; COMMERCIALIZATION; LIFE SCIENCE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION;

JAPAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80053181995     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234211X13122939587699     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blumenthal, D, E G Campbell, M S Anderson, N Causino and K S Louis 1997. Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1224-1228.
2. Bozeman, B and E Corley 2004. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
3. Campbell, E G, B R Clarridge, M Gokhale, L Birenbaum, S Hilgartner, N A Holtzman and D Blumenthal 2002. Data withholding in academic genetics- evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(4), 473-480.
4. Campbell, E G, J S Weissman, N Causino and D Blumenthal 2000. Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy, 29(2), 303-312.
5. Etzkowitz, H 1998. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823-833.
6. Furman, J L and S Stern 2006. Climbing atop the shoulders ofgiants: the impact of institutions on cumulative research. NBER Working Paper 12523. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. Haeussler, C, L Jiang, J Thursby and M C Thursby 2009. Specific and general information sharing among academic scientists. NBER Working Paper 15315. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. Lei, Z, R Juneja and B D Wright 2009. Patents versus patenting: implications of intellectual property protection for biological research. Nature Biotechnology, 27(1), 36-40.
9. Merton, R K 1973. Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Sharing Publication-related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
11. Schofield, P N, T Bubela, T Weaver, L Portilla, S D Brown, J M Hancock, D Einhorn, G Tocchini-Valentini, MHD Angelis and N Rosenthal (participants at meeting of CASIMIR in Rome) 2009. Post-publication sharing of data and tools. Nature, 461, 171-173.
12. Slaughter, S and L L Leslie 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Vogeli, C, R Yucel, E Bendavid, L M Jones, M S Anderson, K S Louis and E G Campbell 2006. Data withholding and the next generation of scientists: results of a national survey. Academic Medicine, 81(2), 128-136.
14. Walsh, J P and H-I Huang 2007. Research tool access in the age of the IP society: Results from a survey of Japanese scientists. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
15. Walsh, J P, W M Cohen and C Cho 2007. Where excludability matters: material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy, 36(8), 1184-1203.