Patents versus patenting: Implications of intellectual property protection for biological research

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 36-40

  Lei, Zhen ^a   Juneja, Rakhi ^b   Wright, Brian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; FUNDING; INDUSTRY; INTELLECT; INTERVIEW; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTION; REVIEW; SCIENTIST;

AGRICULTURE; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; DRUG INDUSTRY; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; PATENTS AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 60149087768     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0109-36     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Walsh, J.P., Arora, A. & Cohen, W.M. Science 299, 1020 (2003).
2. Walsh, J.P., Cho, C. & Cohen, W.M. Science 309, 2002-2003 (2005).
3. Straus, J. Genetic inventions and patents: a German empirical study, in OECD Report "Genetic Inventions, Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing Practices," Chapter 4, 2002. 〈http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/42/21/2491084.pdf〉
4. Nicol, D. & Nielsen, J. Patents and medical biotechnology: an empirical analysis of issues facing the Australian industry, Centre for Law & Genetics, Occasional Paper 6 (2003). 〈http://www.ipria.org/ publications/reports/BiotechReportFinal.pdf〉
5. Nagaoka, S. An empirical analysis of patenting and licensing practices of research tools from three perspectives, presented in OECD Conference on Research Use of Patented Inventions, Madrid (2006). 〈http://www.oepm.es/cs/ OEPMSite/contenidos/ponen/conferenciantes/archivosPDF/36816178.pdf〉
6. Shapiro, C., Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting, Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, 119-150 (2001).
7. Heller, M.A. & Eisenberg, R.S. Science 280, 698-701 (1998).
8. Caulfield, T., Cook-Deegan, R.M., Kieff, F.S. & Walsh, J.P. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1091-1094 (2006).
9. Walsh, J.P., Cho, C. & Cohen, W.M. Res. Policy 36, 1184-1203 (2007).
10. O'Connor, S. Berkeley Technol. Law J. 21, 1017-1054, (2006).
11. Jefferson, R. Innov.: Technol., Governance, Global. 1, 13-44, (2006).
12. Atkinson, R.C. et al. Science 301,174-175 (2003).
13. 〈http://www.autm.net/aboutTT /aboutTT-umbta.cfm〉
14. Cukier, K.N. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 249-251 (2006).
15. Hansen, S.A. International intellectual property experiences: a report of four countries (AAAS , Washington, DC, 2007). 〈http://sippi.aaas. org/Pubs/SIPPI-Four-Country-Report.pdf〉
16. Goldberger, J., Foltz, J., Barham, B. & Goeschl, T. Summary report. Modern agricultural science in transition: a survey of US land-grant agricultural and life scientists. PATS Research Report No. 14, Program on Agricultural Technology Studies (Cooperative Extension, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2005). 〈http://www.pats.wisc.edu/Publications/ Research%20Reports/researchreport14.pdf〉
17. Bekelman, J.E., Li, Y. & Gross, C.P. JAMA 289, 454-465 (2003).
18. Hansen, S.A., Kisielewski, M.R. & Asher, J.L. Intellectual property experiences in the United States scientific community (AAAS , Washington, DC, 2007). 〈http://sippi.aaas.org/Pubs/SIPPI-US-IP-Survey. pdf〉
19. Eisenberg, R.S. Ind. Corp. Change 15, 1013-1031 (2006).
20. Glenna, L.L., William, W.B., Welsh, R. & Biscotti, D. Sociol. Q. 48, 141-163 (2007).
21. Kennedy, D. Science 307, 1375 (2005).
22. Eisenberg, R.S. in Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property (eds. Dreyfuss, R.C., Zimmerman, D.L. & First, H.) 223-250 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 2001).
23. Kisielewski, M.R., Asher, J.L. & Hansen, S.A. Intellectual property experiences in the United Kingdom scientific community (AAS, Washington, DC, 2007). 〈http://sippi.aaas.org/Pubs/SIPPI-UK-IP-Survey. pdf〉
24. Westerburg, S., Asher, J.L., Kisielewski, M.R. & Hansen, S.A. Intellectual property experiences in the German scientific community (AAAS , Washington, DC, 2007). 〈http://sippi.aaas.org/Pubs/SIPPI-Germany- IP-Survey.pdf〉
25. Walsh, J.P. & Huang, H.I. Research tool access in the age of the IP society. Results from a survey of Japanese scientists, Project on Science and Intellectual Property in the Public Interest (2007) 〈http://sippi.aaas.org/ Pubs/SIPPI-Japan-IP-Survey.pdf〉
26. Hagstrom, W.O. Am. Sociol. Rev. 39, 1-18 (1974).
27. Murray, F. & Stern, S. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 63, 648-687 (2007).