Bayesian exponential family projections for coupled data sources

Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 286-293

  Klami, Arto ^a   Virtanen, Seppo ^a   Kaski, Samuel ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA HANDLING; FACTORIZATION; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA-SOURCES; EXPONENTIAL FAMILY; GAUSSIANITY; MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS; MODELING TOOL; MULTI-VIEW LEARNING; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS);

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053152573     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Archambeau, C. and Bach, F. (2009). Sparse probabilistic projections. In NIPS 21, pp. 73-80. MIT Press.
2. Bach, F. R. and Jordan, M. I. (2005). A probabilistic interpretation of canonical correlation analysis. Technical Report 688, Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley.
3. Collins, M., Dasgupta, S., and Schapire, R. E. (2002). A generalization of principal components analysis to the exponential family. In NIPS 14, pp. 617-624. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
4. Farquhar, J. D. R., Hardoon, D. R., Meng, H., Shawe-Taylor, J., and Szedmak, S. (2006). Two view learning: SVM-2K, theory and practice. In NIPS 18, pp. 355-362, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
5. Guo, Y. (2009). Supervised exponential family principal component analysis via convex optimization. In NIPS 21, pp. 569-576. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
6. Guo, Y. and Schuurmans, D. (2008). Efficient global optimization for exponential family PCA and low-rank matrix factorization. In Allerton Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing, pp. 1100-1107. IEEE.
7. Gustafsson, M. G. (2001). A probabilistic derivation of the partial least-squares algorithm. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 41:288-294. (Pubitemid 32408641)
8. Ho-, P. D. (2007). Model averaging and dimension selection for the singular value decomposition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102:674-685.
9. Klami, A. and Kaski, S. (2007). Local dependent components. In ICML 2007, pp. 425-432. Omnipress.
10. Klami, A. and Kaski, S. (2008). Probabilistic approach to detecting dependencies between data sets. Neurocomputing, 72:39-46.
11. Mohamed, S., Heller, K., and Ghahramani, Z. (2009). Bayesian exponential family PCA. In NIPS 21, pp. 1089-1096. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
12. Murray, I., Ghahramani, Z, and MacKay, D. (2006). MCMC for doubly-intractable distributions. UAI 2006, pp. 359-366. AUAI press.
13. Nounou, M., Bakshi, B., Goel, P., and Shen, X. (2002). Process modeling by Bayesian latent variable regression. AIChE Journal, 48:1775-1793. (Pubitemid 36173014)
14. Rish, I., Grabarnik, G., Cecchi, G., Pereira, F., and Gordon, G. J. (2008). Closed-form supervised dimensionality reduction with generalized linear models. In ICML 2008, pp. 832-839, New York, NY, ACM.
15. Roweis, S. and Ghahramani, Z. (1999). A unifying review of linear gaussian models. Neural Computation, 11:305-345.
16. Sajama and Orlitsky, A. (2004). Semi-parametric exponential family PCA. In NIPS 17, pp. 1177-1184, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
17. Srebro, N. and Jaakkola, T. (2003). Weighted low-rank approximations. In ICML 2003, pp. 720-727. AAAI Press.
18. Tipping, M. and Bishop, C. (1999). Mixtures of probabilistic principal component analysers. Neural Computation, 11:443-482.
19. Vinokourov, A., Christianini, N., and Shawe-Taylor, J. (2003). Inferring a semantic representation of text via cross-language correlation analysis. In NIPS 15, pp. 1473-1480. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
20. Yu, S., Yu, K., Tresp, V., Kriegel, H.-P., and Wu, M. (2006). Supervised probabilistic principal component analysis. In KDD 2006, pp. 464-473. New York, NY, ACM Press. (Pubitemid 44535543)