Nanotechnology's triple helix: A case study of the University at Albany's College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 546-564

  Schultz, Laura I ^a  

^a SUNY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Nanotechnology; Regional development; Research center; Triple helix; University industry collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053095286     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9201-8     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. $2.7B boost for Tech Valley. (2005). Albany times union. Albany, NY, 5 Jan. 2005: A1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
2. A sweet IBM deal; $1.6B expansion could create new jobs upstate. (2008). Albany times union, Albany, NY, 15 July 2008: A1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
3. Agrawal, A., & Cockburn, I. (2002). University research, industrial R&D and the anchor tenant hypothesis. NBER Working Paper 9212. Available for download www.nber.org/papers/w9212.
4. AT Kearny Report. (2007). Delivering on the promise of New York State: A strategy for economic and growth and revitalization. Available at: http://www.atkearney.com/index.php/Publications/deliveringon-the-promise-of-new-york-state.html.
5. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanoscience by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70, 859-880.
6. Big hopes pinned on science of small; Planned expansion of UAlbany nanotech venture seen as economic boost. (2007). Albany times union. Albany, NY 11 May 2007: A1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). Current employment statistics. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/ces/.
8. Chip facility bound for Albany: $403M research center expected to attract high-tech firms, jobs. (2002).Albany times union. Albany, NY, 18 July 2002: A1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
9. Confessore, N. (2009). New factory seen as boon for upstate. New York Times 25 July 2009: A24(L). New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
10. Etkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations'. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
11. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities in the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Pinter.
12. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
13. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies. (2002). In C. W. Wessner (Eds.), National Research Council. Available at: www.nap.edu/catalog/10584.html.
14. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 92, 630-653.
15. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.
16. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (1998). Universities as partners in ATP-funded research projects. Final report to the Advanced Technology Program.
17. Hamm, S. (2007). Radical collaboration, Business Week, 9/10/2007., i 4049, p. 16.
18. Leyedesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70, 693-713.
19. Link, A., & Scott, J. (2005). Universities as partners in US research joint ventures. Research Policy, 34(3), 385-393.
20. Lux Research. (2004). The Nanotech Report 2004.
21. M + W move a sign of high tech to come. (2010). Albany times union Albany, NY, 10 Feb. 2010: D1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
22. Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42, 195-205.
23. Molas-Gallart, J., Saltar, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, J. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
24. Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics Magazine, 4, 114-117.
25. National Governors Association. (2007). Innovation America: Cluster based strategies fro growing state economies. Available at: www.nga.org/files/pdf/0702INNOVATIONCLUSTERS.pdf.
26. Office of the State Comptroller. (2010). Fuller road management corporation and The Research Foundation of the State University of New York: Use of State Funding for Research into Emerging Technologies at the State University of New York at Albany: Nanotechnology. Report Number: 2010-S-4. Available at: www.osc.state.ny.us/audits/allaudits/093010/10s4.pdf.
27. Phan, P., & Siegel, D. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from quantitative and qualitative research in the US and the UK. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics. Number 0609. Downloaded from: www.rpi.edu/dept/economcis/www/workingpapers/.
28. Playing big role in a tiny world. (2001). Albany times union, Albany, NY 5 Jan. 2001: A1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
29. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
30. Powers, P. (2004). Building the Austin technology cluster: the role of government and community collaboration in the "human capital". Proceedings rural conferences, federal reserve bank of Kansas City, issue May, pp 53-71.
31. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323-348.
32. Rothaermel, F., Agung, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
33. Schultz, L., & Joutz, F. (2010). Methods for identifying emerging General Purpose Technologies: A case study of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics, 85(1), 155-170.
34. Shih, W., Pisano, G., & King, A. (2008). Radical collaboration: IBM microelectronics joint development alliances. Harvard Business School Case Study 9-608-121.
35. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111-133.
36. Small Times 2009 University Report and Rankings. (2009). Downloaded from www.smalltimes.com.
37. State Science and Technology Institute. (2006). A resource guide for technology-based economic development. Available at: www.ssti.org/publications/onlinepubs/resource_guide.pdf.
38. Technology carries ball as collegiate moneymaker. (1996). Albany times union, Albany, NY, 25 Feb. 1996: T43. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
39. United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent full text and full-Pge image databases. Available at: http://patft.uspto.gov/.
40. VISTEC opens at Watervliet arsenal. (2008). Albany times union, Albany, NY, 26 Nov. 2008: C1. New York State Newspapers. Web. 24 May 2010.
41. Vonortas, N. S. (1997). Cooperation in research and development. Boston: Kluwer
42. Wong, P., Ho, Y., & Chan, C. (2007). Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70, 715-737.