An integrated professional development model for effective teaching

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1687-1694

  Kuijpers, J M ^a   Houtveen, A A M ^b   Wubbels, Th ^c  

^a NHL STENDEN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coaching; Professional development model; School effectiveness; School improvement; Student achievement; Teacher practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053062128     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.021     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bloom H.S., Rock J., Ham S., Melton L., O'Brien J. Evaluating the accelerated schools approach. A look at early implementation and impacts on student achievement in eight elementary schools 2001, Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, New York.
2. Borman G.D., Rachuba L., Datnow A., Alberg M., MacIver M., Stringfield S., et al. Four models of school improvement. Successes and challenges in reforming low-performing, high-poverty title I schools 2000, (Report no. 48), Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research of Students Placed At Risk, Baltimore.
3. Carlson C.D., Francis D.J. Increasing the reading achievement of at-risk children through direct instruction: evaluation of the Rodeo Institute for Teacher Excellence (RITE). Journal of Education For Students Placed at Risk 2002, 7(2):141-166.
4. Center for Cognitive Coaching Overview of cognitive coaching Retrieved from, on 05.04.10. http://www.cognitivecoaching.com/overview.htm.
5. Costa A.L., Garmston R.J. Cognitive coaching: supervision for intelligent teaching. Wingspan 1986, 3:38-40.
6. Costa A.L., Garmston R.J. Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools 1994, Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Norwood, MA.
7. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L. The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools 2007, Routledge, London.
8. Crévola C.A., Hill P.W. Evaluation of a whole-school approach to prevention and intervention in early literacy. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 1998, 3(2):133-157.
9. Earl L.M., Timperley H. Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using high evidence for improvement 2008, Springer.
10. Fishman B.J., Marx R.W., Best S., Revital T.T. Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education 2003, 18:483-500.
11. Fullan M. The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change 2000, 1:5-28.
12. Glickman C.D. Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach 1985, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
13. Glickman C.D. Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach 1990, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. 2nd ed.
14. Guskey T. Evaluating professional development 2000, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
15. Hopkins D. School improvement for real 2001, Falmer Press, London.
16. Hopkins D., Ainscow M., West M. School improvement in an era of change 1994, Cassel, London.
17. Houtveen, A. A. M. (2007). Leren Lezen is te Leren. [Learning to Read is Teachable] Openbare les Lectoraat Leerproblemen, in het bijzonder Preventie van Leesproblemen. Utrecht: Hogeschool Utrecht.
18. Houtveen, Th., & Vegt, A. L. van der (1991). Begeleiden van leraren. Onderzoek naar de mogelijkheden van en behoeften aan begeleiding van leraren in de 1e fase van het voortgezet onderwijs. Utrecht: ISOR/ Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht.
19. Houtveen A.A.M., Grift W.J.C.M.van de, Creemers B.P.M. Effective school improvement in mathematics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2004, 15:337-376.
20. Houtveen, A. A. M., Kuijpers, J. M., & Groenen, I. (2007). Verbreding van verbetering van leerlingresultaten. Beschrijving en evaluatie van het Innovatietraject De kracht van de Samenwerkingsverbanden WSNS. [Towards large-scale improvement of student results]. Utrecht: Hogeschool Utrecht.
21. Houtveen, T., & Grift, W. van de (2007a). Reading instruction for struggling learners. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(4), 405-425.
22. Houtveen A.A.M., Grift W.J.C.M.van de Effects of metacognitive strategy instruction and instruction time on reading comprehension. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2007, 18:173-190.
23. Joyce B., Showers B. Improving inservice training: the message of research. Educational Leadership 1980, 37:379-385.
24. Joyce B., Showers B. Student achievement through staff development 1988, Longman, New York/London.
25. Joyce B., Showers B. Student achievement through staff development 1995, (Rev. ed.), Longman, New York/London.
26. Joyce B., Showers B. Student achievement through staff development 2002, Longman, New York/London. 3rd ed.
27. Kushman J.W., Yap K. Mississippi onward to excellence impact study 1997, Final report, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, OR.
28. March J.T., Olsen J.P. Ambiguity and choice in organizations 1976, Iniversitetsforlaget, Bergen, Sweden.
29. Marzano R.J., Waters T., Mcnulty B.A. School leadership that works. From research to results 2005, ASCD, Alexandria, VA.
30. Mijs, T. J. E., Houtveen, A. A. M., Wubbels, Th., & Creemers, B. (2005, January). An empirical basis for school reform aimed at improving pupil performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Barcelona. ICSEI paper, 3 January 2005.
31. Pajak E. Approaches to clinical supervision: Alternatives for improving instruction 1993, Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc, Norwood.
32. Pajak E. Approaches to clinical supervision: Alternatives for improving instruction 2000, Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc, Norwood. 2nd ed.
33. Putnam R., Borko H. Teacher learning: implications of new views of cognition. The international handbook of teachers and teaching 1997, 1223-1296. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. B.J. Biddle, T.L. Good, I.F. Goodson (Eds.).
34. Ragan V., Liston C. Comprehensive professional development. A review of the literature 2008, Puget Sound Center, Bothell, WA.
35. Ross S., Tabachnick S., Sterbinsky A. Using comprehensive school reform models to raise student achievement: Factors associated with success in Memphis schools 2002, University of Memphis, Center for Research in Educational Policy, Memphis.
36. Scheerens J., Glas C., Thomas S.M. Educational evaluation, assessment and monitoring. A systemic approach 2003, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.
37. Showers B., Joyce B., Bennet B. Synthesis of research on staff development: a framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership 1987, 45:77-87.
38. Slavin R.E., Lake C., Chambers B., Cheung A., Davis B. Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: a best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 2009, 79(4):1391-1467.
39. Stringfield S., Datnow A., Borman G., Rachuba L. National evaluation of core knowledge sequence implementation 2000, Final report, Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools, Baltimore.
40. Supovitz J.A. Translating teaching practice into improved student achievement. From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reforms in the states. One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Issue II 2001, 81-98. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. S.H. Fuhrman (Ed.).
41. Taylor B.M., Pearson P.D., Peterson D.S., Rodriguez M.C. The Ciera school change framework: an evidence-based approach to professional development and school reading improvement. Reading Research Quarterly 2005, 40(1):40-69.
42. Wilson S.M., Berne J. Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: an examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education 1999, 24:173-211.