Influence of uncertainties on the response and reliability of self-adaptive composite rotors

Composite Structures

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 114-120

  Motley, Michael R ^a,b   Young, Yin L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fluid structure interactions; Reliability; Self adaptive composite structure; Stochastic analysis

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES; BLADE GEOMETRY; BOUNDARY ELEMENTS; COMPLEX CONFIGURATION; COMPOSITE PROPELLERS; COMPOSITE ROTORS; DEFORMATION COUPLINGS; EFFECTS OF MATERIALS; ELEMENT METHOD; FAILURE INITIATION; FULLY-COUPLED; HIGH SPECIFIC STRENGTH; ISOTROPIC STRUCTURE; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; MATERIAL STRENGTH; MODELING UNCERTAINTIES; MORPHING; OPERATING CONDITION; RANDOM VARIATION; SELF-ADAPTIVE; STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY; SYSTEM RELIABILITY;

BENDING (DEFORMATION); BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; COMPOSITE STRUCTURES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; GEOMETRY; LOADING; PROPELLERS; RELIABILITY; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

RIGID STRUCTURES;

EID: 80053051793     PISSN: 02638223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Young Y. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers. J Fluids Struct 2008, 24:799-818.
2. Young YL, Michael TJ, Seaver M, Trickey ST. Numerical and experimental investigations of composite marine propellers. In: 26th Symposium on naval hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy; 2006.
3. Liu Z., Young Y. Utilization of bending-twisting coupling effects for performance enhancement of composite marine propellers. J Fluids Struct 2009, 25:1102-1116.
4. Motley M., Liu Z., Young Y. Utilizing fluid-structure interactions to improve energy efficiency of composite marine propellers in spatially varying wake. Compos Struct 2009, 90:304-313.
5. Motley M, Young Y. Reliability-based global design of self-adaptive marine rotors. In: Proceedings of ASME 2010 3rd ioint US-European fluids engineering summer meeting and 8th international conference on nanochannels, microchannels, and minichannels, Montreal, Canada; 2010.
6. Potter K., Campbell M., Langer C., Wisnom M. The generation of geometrical deformations due to tool/part interaction in the manufacture of composite components. Composites Part A 2005, 36:301-308.
7. Potter K., Khan B., Wisnom M., Bell T., Stevens J. Variability, fibre waviness and misalignment in the determination of the properties of composite materials and structures. Composites Part A 2008, 39:1343-1354.
8. Shiao M, Singhal S, Chamis C. A method for the probabilistic design assessment of composite structures. Technical report, NASA Technical Memorandum 106384; 1992.
9. Mahadevan S., Liu X., Xiao Q. A probabilistic progressive failure model of composite laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos 1997, 16:1020-1038.
10. Kam T., Chang E. Reliability formulation for composite laminates subjected to first-ply failure. Compos Struct 1997, 38:447-452.
11. Nakayasu H., Maekawa Z. A comparative study of failure criteria in probabilistic fields and stochastic failure envelopes of composite materials. Reliab Eng System Safety 1997, 56:209-220.
12. Chen N., Sun H., Guedes Soares C. Reliability analysis of a ship hull in composite material. Compos Struct 2003, 62:59-66.
13. Onkar A., Upadhyay C., Yadav D. Probabilistic failure of laminated composite plates using the stochastic finite element method. Compos Struct 2007, 77:79-91.
14. Tserpes K., Papanikos P., Labeas G., Pantelakis S. Fatigue damage accumulation and residual strength assessment of CFRP laminates. Compos Struct 2004, 63:219-230.
15. Cheng H., Hwu F. Fatigue reliability analysis of composites based on residual strength. Adv Compos Mater 2006, 15:385-402.
16. Philippidis T., Passipoularidis V. Residual strength after fatigue in composites: theory vs. experiment. Int J Fatigue 2007, 29:2104-2116.
17. Kang K., Lim D., Kim J. Probabilistic analysis for the fatigue life of carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Struct 2008, 85:258-264.
18. Post N., Case S., Lesko J. Modeling the variable amplitude fatigue of composite materials: a review and evaluation of the state of the art for spectrum loading. Int J Fatigue 2008, 30:2064-2086.
19. Post N., Cain J., McDonald K., Case S., Lesko J. Residual strength prediction of composite materials: random spectrum loading. Eng Fract Mech 2008, 75:2707-2724.
20. Allen M., Maute K. Reliability-based shape optimization of structures undergoing fluid-structure interaction phenomena. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2005, 194:3472-3495.
21. Orifici A., Herszberg I., Thomson R. Review of methodologies for composite material modelling incorporating failure. Compos Struct 2008, 86:194-210.
22. ABAQUS, ABAQUS version 6.5 documentation, ABAQUS, Inc., 1080 Main Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860; 2005.
23. Young Y. Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propellers. J Fluids Struct 2007, 23:269-295.
24. Young Y., Shen Y. A numerical tool for the design/analysis of dual-cavitating propellers. J Fluids Eng 2007, 129:720-730.
25. Young YL, Liu Z, Motley M. Influence of material anisotropy on the hydroelastic behaviors of composite marine propellers. In: 27th Symposium on naval hydrodynamics. Seoul, Korea; 2008.
26. Motley M, Young Y. Performance-based design of adaptive composite marine propellers. In: 28th Symposium on naval hydrodynamics. Pasadena, CA; 2010.
27. Motley M, Young Y. Performance-based design and analysis of flexible composite propulsors. J Fluid Struct 2011, accepted for publication.
28. Ochi M. Wave statistics for the design of ships and ocean structures. Trans Soc Naval Archit Marine Eng 1978, 86:47-76.
29. Tsai S., Hopkins B., Stenson R. Comparison of powering performance between DDG-51 and conventional combatant hull forms. Naval Eng J 1994, 88-99.
30. Lophaven S, Nielsen H, Sondergaard J. DACE - a MATLAB kriging toolbox. Technical report IMM-TR-2002-12. Technical Report, Technical University of Denmark; 2002.
31. Paris F. A study of failure criteria of fibrous composite materials. Technical report, NASA/CR-2001-210661; 2001.
32. Icardi U., Locatto S., Longo A. Assessment of recent theories for predicting failure of composite laminates. Appl Mech Rev 1997, 60:76-86.
33. Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional composites. J Appl Mech 1980, 47:329-334.
34. Ochoa O., Engblom J. Analysis of progressive failure in composites. Compos Sci Technol 1987, 28:87-102.
35. Long R. Static strength of adhesively bonded ARALL-1 joints. J Compos Mater 1991, 25:391-415.
36. Cuntze R., Freund A. The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2004, 64:344-377.
37. Hashin Z., Rotem A. A fatigue failure criterion for fiber reinforced materials. J Compos Mater 1973, 7:448-464.
38. Chang F., Chang K. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations. J Compos Mater 1987, 21:834-855.
39. Lee J. Three dimensional finite element analysis of damage accumulation in composite laminate. Comput Struct 1982, 15:335-350.
40. Brewer J., Lagace P. Quadratic stress criterion for initiation of delamination. J Compos Mater 1988, 22:1141-1155.
41. Tong L. An assessment of failure criteria to predict the strength of adhesively bonded composite double lap joints. J Reinf Plastic Compos 1997, 16:698-713.