Using education theory to design a patient e-health education system capable of increasing health literacy

Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Butterworth, Kevin ^a   Gray, Alex ^a   Butterworth, Heather ^a   Allam, Omnia ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION SYSTEMS; EHEALTH; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH LITERACY; LEARNING MATERIALS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EDUCATION; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

HEALTH;

EID: 80053041633     PISSN: 10637125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CBMS.2011.5999121     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Edited by the World Health Organization, Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010, W.H. Organization, Editor. 2011.
2. Coulter, A., S. Parsons, and J. Askham, Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care? World Health Organization, 2008.
3. Nutbeam, D., Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 2000.
4. Buetow, S., A. Jutel, and K. Hoare, Shrinking social space in the doctor-modern patient relationship: a review of forces for, and implications of, homologisation. Patient Educ Couns, 2009. 74(1): p. 97-103.
5. Paterniti, D., et al., "I'm going to die of something anyway": women's perceptions of tamoxifen for breast cancer risk reduction. Ethn Dis, 2005. 15(3): p. 365-72.
6. Baldwin, A.S., et al., Preferences for a patient-centered role orientation: association with patient-information-seeking behavior and clinical markers of health. Ann Behav Med, 2008. 35(1): p. 80-6.
7. Fox, R., Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2006. 28(4): p. 309-17.
8. Butterworth, K., D.O. Allam, and P.A. Gray, The pedagogical requirements of patient ehealth education to increase health literacy. IEEE Computer Based Medical Systems, 2010.
9. O'Brien, T. and D. Guiney, Differentiation in teaching and learning. principles and practice. 2001: Continuum Intl Pub Group. 177.
10. Norwich, B., Special needs education or education for all: connective specialisation and ideological impurity. British Journal of Special Education, 1996. 23(3): p. 100-104.
11. Petty, G., Evidence Based Teaching: A Practical Approach . 2009, Cheltenham: Nelson Thomas. 378.
12. Capel, S., Learning to Teach in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience. 2009: Taylor and Francis.
13. Harland, J.A. and P.A. Bath, Understanding the information behaviours of carers of people with dementia: a critical review of models from information science. Aging & mental health, 2008. 12(4): p. 467-77.
14. Manning, D. and C. Dickens, Health literacy: more choice, but do cancer patients have the skills to decide? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 2006. 15(5): p. 448-52.
15. Friedman, D. and L. Hoffman-Goetz, An exploratory study of older adults' comprehension of printed cancer information: is readability a key factor? J Health Commun, 2007. 12(5): p. 423-37.
16. Weiss, B., Health literacy: A manual for clinicians. 2003, American Medical Association Foundation.
17. Badarudeen, S. and S. Sabharwal, Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010. 468(10): p. 2572-80.
18. Kirschner, P., J. Sweller, and R. Clark, Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 2006.
19. Mayer, R., Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?. American Psychologist, 2004. 59(1): p. 14-19.
20. Dixon-Woods, M., Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets. Social science & medicine (1982), 2001. 52(9): p. 1417-32.
21. Bader, J.L. and N. Strickman-Stein, Evaluation of new multimedia formats for cancer communications. J Med Internet Res, 2003. 5(3): p. e16.
22. McPherson, C.J., I.J. Higginson, and J. Hearn, Effective methods of giving information in cancer: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med, 2001. 23(3): p. 227-34.
23. Tesanovic, A., et al., eHealth personalization in the next generation RPM systems. Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2009. CBMS 2009. 22nd IEEE International Symposium on, 2009: p. 1 - 8.
24. Jones, R., et al., Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ, 1999. 319(7219): p. 1241-7.
25. Schwartz, L.M., S. Woloshin, and H.G. Welch, Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2009. 150(8): p. 516-27.
26. Aujoulat, I., W. d'Hoore, and A. Deccache, Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony? Patient education and counseling, 2007. 66(1): p. 13-20.
27. Fisler, J. and S. Bleisch, eLML, the eLesson Markup Language: Developing sustainable e-Learning Content Using an Open Source XML Framework, in WEBIST 2006 - International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies. 2006: Setubal, Portugal.
28. Torgerson, C., G. Brooks, and J. Porthouse, Adult literacy and numeracy interventions and outcomes: A review of controlled trials. 2004, European Union.