T1-weighted 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a dual-echo dixon technique at 3 T

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 842-851

  Dogan, Basak E ^a   Ma, Jingfei ^a   Hwang, Ken ^a,b   Liu, Ping ^a   Yang, Wei Tse ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast MRI; Dixon technique; fat suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053041225     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22705     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007; 370: 485-492. (Pubitemid 47214635)
2. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Radiology 2007; 243: 670-680. (Pubitemid 46799419)
3. Lehman CD, Schnall MD, Pisano ED, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007; 244: 381-388. (Pubitemid 47080869)
4. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849.
5. Joseph PM, Shetty A,. A comparison of selective saturation and selective echo chemical shift imaging techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 1988; 6: 421-430.
6. Dixon WT,. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984; 153: 189-194. (Pubitemid 14043406)
7. Ma J,. Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 543-558.
8. Ma J,. Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 415-419. (Pubitemid 39025289)
9. Ma J, Vu AT, Son JB, Choi H, Hazle JD,. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique for contrast agent enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 36-41. (Pubitemid 43100716)
10. Low RN, Panchal N, Vu AT, et al. Three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo dual echo (3D-FSPGR-DE) with water reconstruction: preliminary experience with a novel pulse sequence for gadolinium-enhanced abdominal MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 946-956.
11. Cornfeld DM, Israel G, McCarthy SM, Weinreb JC,. Pelvic imaging using a T1W fat-suppressed three-dimensional dual echo Dixon technique at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 121-127. (Pubitemid 351956474)
12. Le-Petross H, Kundra V, Szklaruk J, Wei W, Hortobagyi GN, Ma J,. Fast three-dimensional dual echo dixon technique improves fat suppression in breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 889-894.
13. Elsamaloty H, Elzawawi MS, Mohammad S, Herial N,. Increasing accuracy of detection of breast cancer with 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1142-1148.
14. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabatti N, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 239: 666-676. (Pubitemid 43830601)
15. Brau AC, Beatty PJ, Skare S, Bammer R,. Efficient computation of autocalibrating parallel imaging reconstructions. In: Proc ISMRM, Seattle; 2006: 2462.
16. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BI-RADS®. 4th edition. In: ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA: ACR; 2003.
17. Shick F,. Whole body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 946-959.
18. Foo TKF, Sawyer A, Faulkner W, Mills DG,. Inversion in the steady state: contrast optimization and reduced imaging time with fast three-dimensional inversion-recovery-prepared GRE pulse sequences. Radiology 1994; 191: 85-90.
19. Doher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM,. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15: 277-290.
20. Tse GM, Chaiwun B, Wong KT, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions-a pathologic correlation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 103: 1-10. (Pubitemid 46653267)
21. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Drotman MB, et al. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience. Radiology 2000; 214: 67-72. (Pubitemid 30019871)
22. Kazama T, Nakamura S, Doi O, Suzuki K, Hirose M, Ito H,. Prospective evaluation of pectoralis muscle invasion of breast cancer by MR imaging. Breast Cancer 2005; 4: 312-316.