Prospective evaluation of pectoralis muscle invasion of breast cancer by MR imaging

Breast Cancer

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 312-316

  Kazama, Toshiki ^a,c   Nakamura, Seigo ^a   Doi, Osamu ^a   Hirose, Masanori ^a,d   Suzuki, Koyu ^b   Ito, Hisao ^c  

^a Department of Radiology Breast Surgical Oncology ^*  (Japan)

^b ST LUKE'S INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c CHIBA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^d SHOWA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Diagnosis; Magnetic resonance; Staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33644841010     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: 18804233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2325/jbcs.12.312     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Di Biase SJ, Komarnicky, Schwartz GF, Xie Y, Mansfield CM: The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 82:2212-2220, 1998. (Pubitemid 28240828)
2. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al: Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18:1668-1675, 2000. (Pubitemid 30220545)
3. Frykberg ER, Bland KI: Evolution of surgical principles for the management of breast cancer. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM eds, The breast: comprehensive management of benign and malignant diseases, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia; pp539-569, 1991.
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al: Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115-122, 1995.
5. Hirose M, Suzuki H, Doi O, Nakamura S, Saiki S, Yoshitome E: Utility of 3D MR mammography in determining the choice for conservation surgery of breast cancer (abstr). Radiology 197 (P):460, 1995.
6. Morris EA, Schwarz LH, Drotman MB, et al: Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience. Radiology 214:67-72, 2000. (Pubitemid 30019871)
7. Fobben ES, Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, Dembner AG, Seltzer MH, Santoro EJ: Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 196:143-152, 1995.
8. Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al: Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spin-echo contrastenhanced MRI of the breast. Clin Radiol 50:440-454, 1995.
9. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Li Volsi VA, Troupin RH: Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with cardiologicpathologic correlation. Radiology 190:485-493, 1994. (Pubitemid 24044258)
10. Mueller RD, Barkhausen J, Sauerwein W, Langer R: Assessment of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:408-412, 1998. (Pubitemid 28396733)
11. Heywang-Koebrunner SH, Schlegel A, Beck R, et al: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17:891-900, 1993. (Pubitemid 23335563)