Understanding post-adoptive agile usage - An exploratory cross-case analysis

Proceedings - 2011 Agile Conference, Agile 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 117-126

  Senapathi, Mali ^a   Srinivasan, Ananth ^b  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Agile usage; Effectiveness

Indexed keywords

AGILE METHODOLOGIES; AGILE PRACTICES; AGILE USAGE; EFFECTIVENESS; ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; TOP MANAGEMENT SUPPORT; USAGE MODELS;

EID: 80052987069     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/AGILE.2011.19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Abrahamsson, P., K. Conboy, and X. Wang, 'Lots done, more to do': the current state of agile systems development research. European Journal of Information Systems, 2009. 18(281-284).
2. Dyba, T. and T. Dingsoyr, What do we know about Agile Software Development? IEEE Software, 2009. September/October: p. 6-8.
3. Kwon, T.H. and R.W. Zmud, Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation, in Critical issues in information systems research. 1987, John Wiley \& Sons, Inc. p. 227-251.
4. Karahanna, E. Symbolic Adoption of Information Technology. in Proceedings of Decision Sciences International Conference. 1999. Athens, Greece.
5. McChesney, I.R. and D. Glass, Postimplementation management of CASE methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 1993. 2(3): p. 201-209.
6. Patton, J. Kanband Development Oversimplified, http://www. agileproductdesign.com/blog/2009/kanban-over-simplified.html. 2009.
7. Mangalaraj, G., R. Mahapatra, and S. Nerur, Acceptance of software process innovations - the case of extreme programming. Empirical Software Engineering, 2009. 18: p. 344-354.
8. Pikkarainen, M., X. Wang, and K. Conboy. Agile Practices in Use from an Innovation Assimilation Perspective: A Multiple Case Study. in Twenty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems. 2007. Montreal.
9. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth ed. 2003, New York: Free Press.
10. Williams, L., L. Layman, and W. Krebs, Extreme Programming Evaluation Framework for Object-Oriented Languages Version 1.4, in NCSU Technical Report. 2004.
11. Huisman, M. and J. Iivari, The Individual Deployment of Systems Development Methodologies, in CAISE 2002, LNCS 2348, A.B. Pidduck, Editor. 2002, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. p. 134-150.
12. Iivari, J., Why are CASE tools not used? Communications of the ACM, 1996. 39(10): p. 94 -103. (Pubitemid 126428073)
13. Roberts, T.L. and C.T. Hughes, Obstacles to implementing a system development methodology. Journal of Systems Management, 1996. 47(2): p. 36-40.
14. Hardgrave, B.C., F.D. Davis, and C.K. Riemenschneider, Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003. 20(1): p. 123-151.
15. Rajlich, V., Changing the paradigm of software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 2006. 49(8): p. 67-70. (Pubitemid 44232128)
16. Nerur, S. and R. Mahapatra, Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. Communications of the ACM, 2005. 48(5): p. 73-78.
17. Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad, A Field Study of the Adoption of Software Process Innovations by Information Systems Professionals. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2000. 47(3): p. 295-308.
18. Fitzgerald, B., The use of systems development methodolgies in practice: a field study. Information Systems Journal, 1997. 7: p. 201- 212. (Pubitemid 127468509)
19. Green, G.C. and A.R. Hevner, Perceived Control of Software Developers and its Impact on the Successful Diffusion of Information Technology, in CMU/SEI-98-SR-013. 1999, Carnegie Mellon, Software Engineering Institute: Pittsburg, PA.
20. VandeVen, A.H., Central Problems in the Management of Innovations. Management Science, 1986. 32(5): p. 590-607.
21. Sultan, F. and L. Chan, The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2000. 47(1): p. 106-206.
22. Roberts, T.L., et al., Factors that impact implementing a SDM. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1998. 24(8): p. 640-649.
23. Vijayasarathy, L.R. and D. Turk, Agile Software Development: A survey of early adopters Journal of Information Technology Management, 2008. 19(2).
24. Cockburn, A. and J. Highsmith, Agile Software Development: The People Factor. Software Management, 2001.
25. Misra, S.C., V. Kumar, and U. Kumar, Identifying some important success factors in adopting agile software development practices. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2009. 82: p. 1869-1890.
26. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 1994, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Eisenhardt, K.M., Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 1989. 14(4): p. 532-550.
28. BBCWorldwide. 2010; Available from: http://www.bbcworldwide.com/about-us. aspx.
29. Middleton, P. and D. Joyce. Lean Software Management a BBC Case Study. Proceedings of the Lean Software and Systems Conference 2010 Atlanta, http://atlantal2010.leanssc.org/proceedings/.
30. Fichman, R.G. and C.F. Kemerer, The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective. Management Science, 1997. 43(10): p. 1345 - 1363. (Pubitemid 127575311)
31. Gallivan, M.J., Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Comlex Technological Innovations: Development of a New Framework. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 2001. 32(3): p. 51-80.