The individual deployment of systems development methodologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2348, Issue , 2002, Pages 134-150

  Huisman, Magda ^a   Iivari, Juhani ^b  

^a NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT SUPPORT; SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84870358962     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Avison, D. E., Fitzgerald, G. (1995) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, McGraw-Hill, Berkshire, England
2. Chatzoglou, P. D., Macaullay, L. A. (1996) Requirements capture and IS methodologies, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 209-225
3. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003
4. Dietrich, G. B., Walz, D. B., Wynekoop, J. L. (1997) The failure of SDT Diffusion: A Case for Mass Customization, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 390-398
5. Fichman, R. G. (1992) Information Technology Diffusion: A review of empirical research, in DeGross, J. I., Becker, J. D., Elam, J. J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, pp. 195-206
6. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
7. Fitzgerald, B. (1996) Formalized SDM: a critical perspective, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 3-23
8. Fitzgerald, B. (1998) An empirical investigation into the adoption of SDM, Information & Management, Vol. 34, pp. 317-328
9. Gefen, D., Straub, D. W. (2000) The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, 2000
10. Ginzberg, M. J. (1981) Key recurrent issues in the MIS implementation process, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 5, pp. 47-59
11. Green, G. C. and Hevner, A. R., Perceived Control of Software Developers and its Impact on the Successful Diffusion of Information Technology, CMU/SEI-98- SR-013, Carnegie Mellon, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1999, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/98.reports/pdf/98sr013.pdf
12. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1992), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Macmillan, New York
13. Hardy, C. J., Thompson J. B., Edwards H. M. (1995) The use, limitations and customization of structured systems development methods in the United Kingdom, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 467-477
14. Heineman, G. T., Botsford, J. E., Caldiera, G., Kaiser, G. E., Kellner, M. I., Madhavji, N. H. (1994) Emerging technologies that support a software process life cycle, IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 501-529
15. Henderson, J. C., Cooprider, J. G. (1990) Dimensions of I/S planning and design aids: A functional model of CASE technology, Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 227-254
16. Herbsleb, J., Zubrow, D., Goldenson, D., Hayes, W., Paulk, M. (1997) Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 30-40
17. Iivari J. (1996) Why are CASE Tools not used?, Communications of the ACM, Vol.39, No.10, pp. 94-103
18. Iivari, J., Hirscheim, R., Klein, H. K. (1999) Beyond Methodologies: Keeping up with Information Systems Development Approaches through Dynamic Classification, Proceedings of the 32nd, Hawaian International Conference on Systems Sciences, pp.1-10
19. Iivari, J. and Huisman, M. (2001) The relationship between organisational culture and the deployment of systems development methodologies, in Dittrich, K., Geppert, A. and Norrie, M. C., Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, pp. 234-250
20. Introna, L. D., Whitley, E. A. (1997) Against methodism, Exploring the limits of methods, Information Technology & People, Vol.10, No. 1, pp. 31-45
21. Isoda, S., Yamamoto, S., Kuroki, H., Oka, A. (1995) Evaluation and Introduction of the Structured Methodology and a CASE Tool, Journal of Systems Software, Vol.28, No.1, pp. 49-58
22. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., Chervany, N. L. (1999) Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and postadoption beliefs, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 183-213
23. Kwon, T. H., Zmud, R. W. (1987) Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation, in Boland, R. J., Hirschheim, R. A. (eds.) Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 227-251
24. Lee, J., Kim, S. (1992) The relationship between procedural formalization and MIS success, Information and Management, Vol.22, pp. 89-111
25. Leonard-Barton, D. (1987) Implementing structured software methodologies: a case of innovation in process technology, Interfaces, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 6-17
26. McChesney, I. R., Glass, D. (1993) Post-implementation management of CASE methodology, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 201-209
27. Moore, G. C., Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an Information Technology innovation, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 192-222
28. Nandhakumar, J., Avison, D. E. (1999) The fiction of methodological development: A field study of information systems development, Information Technology & People, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 176-191
29. Orlikowski, W. J. (1993) CASE Tools as Organizational change: Investigating Incremental and Radical changes in Systems Development, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 309-340
30. Peacham, D. (1985) Structured methods. ten questions you should ask, Data Processing, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 28-30
31. Prescott, M. B., Conger, S. A. (1995) Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research Approach, The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 26, No. 2/3, pp. 20-42
32. Rai, A., Howard, G. S. (1994) Propagating CASE usage for Software Development: An Empirical Investigation of Key Organizational Correlates, OMEGA, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 133-147
33. Roberts, T. L., Hughes, C. T. (1996) Obstacles to implementing a systems development methodology, Journal of Systems Management, Vol. 47, pp. 36-40
34. Roberts, T. L., Gibson, M. L., Fields, K. T., Rainer, R. K. (1998) Factors that impact implementing a SDM, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 24, No.8, pp. 640-649
35. Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York
36. Swanson, E. B. (1994) Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations, Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 1069-1092
37. Tesch, D. B., Klein, G., Sobol, M. G. (1995) Information System Professionals. Attitudes: Development Tools and Concepts, Journal of Systems Software, Vol. 28, No.1, pp. 39-47
38. Vessey, I., Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N. (1992) Evaluation of vendor products: CASE tools and methodology companions, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 90-105
39. Wynekoop J.L., Russo N.L. (1997) Studying SDM: an examination of research methods, Information Systems Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 47-65