The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 225, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 396-404

  Kobza, Stefan ^a   Thoma, Patrizia ^a   Daum, Irene ^a   Bellebaum, Christian ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACC; Feedback; FRN; Observational learning; P300; Probability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMPATHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOPOGRAPHY;

ADULT; BRAIN WAVES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; EMPATHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 80052971397     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.059     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 2002, 109:679-709.
2. Schultz W. Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000, 1:199-207.
3. Knutson B., Cooper J.C. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction. Curr Opin Neurol 2005, 18:411-417.
4. Gehring W.J., Goss B., Coles M.G.H., Meyer D.E., Donchin E. A neural system for error-detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 1993, 4:385-390.
5. Falkenstein M., Hohnsbein J., Hoormann J. Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. Psychophysiological brain research 1990, 192-195. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands. C.H.M. Brunia, A.W.K. Gaillard, A. Kok (Eds.).
6. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:2279-2282.
7. Bellebaum C., Daum I. Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity. Eur J Neurosci 2008, 27:1823-1835.
8. Dunning J.P., Hajcak G. Error-related negativities elicited by monetary loss and cues that predict loss. Neuroreport 2007, 18:1875-1878.
9. Miltner W.H., Braun C.H., Coles M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a generic neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 1997, 9:788-798.
10. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Schurger A., Cohen J.D. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:741-747.
11. Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Cohen J.D. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15:535-544.
12. Holroyd C.B., Hajcak G., Larsen J.T. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Res 2006, 1105:93-101.
13. Nieuwenhuis S., Holroyd C.B., Mol N., Coles M.G. Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004, 28:441-448.
14. Yasuda A., Sato A., Miyawaki K., Kumano H., Kuboki T. Error-related negativity reflects detection of negative reward prediction error. Neuroreport 2004, 15:2561-2565.
15. Holroyd C.B., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Cohen J.D. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. Neuroreport 2003, 14:2481-2484.
16. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Holroyd C.B., Simons R.F. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:905-912.
17. O'Doherty J., Dayan P., Schultz J., Deichmann R., Friston K., Dolan R.J. Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science 2004, 304:452-454.
18. Bellebaum C., Kobza S., Thiele S., Daum I. It was not my fault: event-related brain potentials in active and observational learning from feedback. Cereb Cortex 2010, 20:2874-2883.
19. Hajcak G., Holroyd C.B., Moser J.S., Simons R.F. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology 2005, 42:161-170.
20. Holroyd C.B., Krigolson O.E. Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:913-917.
21. Holroyd C.B., Krigolson O.E., Baker R., Lee S., Gibson J. When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2009, 9:59-70.
22. Bellebaum C., Polezzi D., Daum I. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3343-3350.
23. Yu R.J., Zhou X.L. Brain responses to outcomes of one's own and other's performance in a gambling task. Neuroreport 2006, 17:1747-1751.
24. Frank M.J., Seeberger L.C., O'reilly R.C. By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science 2004, 306:1940-1943.
25. Frank M.J., Woroch B.S., Curran T. Error-related negativity predicts reinforcement learning and conflict biases. Neuron 2005, 47:495-501.
26. Larson M.J., Fair J.E., Good D.A., Baldwin S.A. Empathy and error processing. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:415-424.
27. Fukushima H., Hiraki K. Whose loss is it? Human electrophysiological correlates of non-self reward processing. Soc Neurosci 2009, 4:261-275.
28. Bellebaum C., Kobza S., Thiele S., Daum I. Processing of expected and unexpected monetary performance outcomes in healthy older subjects. Behav Neurosci 2011, 125:241-251.
29. Yeung N., Sanfey A.G. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. J Neurosci 2004, 24:6258-6264.
30. Sato A., Yasuda A., Ohira H., Miyawaki K., Nishikawa M., Kumano H., et al. Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. Neuroreport 2005, 16:407-411.
31. Pfabigan D.P., Alexopoulos J., Bauer H., Sailer U. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 2011, 48:656-664.
32. Paulus C. Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF (IRI) zur Messung von Empathie; 2009. Available from: http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2009/2363/.
33. Davis M.H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Cat Selected Doc Psychol 1980, 10:85.
34. Mehrabian A., Epstein N. A measure of emotional empathy. J Pers 1972, 40:525-543.
35. Schulte-Rüther M., Markowitsch H.J., Fink G.R., Piefke M. Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:1354-1372.
36. Lee T.W., Girolami M., Sejnowski T.J. Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources. Neural Comput 1999, 11:417-441.
37. Eppinger B., Kray J., Mock B., Mecklinger A. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:521-539.
38. Wu Y., Zhou X.L. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation. Brain Res 2009, 1286:114-122.
39. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. Are all medial frontal negativities created equal? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring. Errors, conflicts, and the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring 2004, 14-20. Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig. M. Ullsperger, M. Falkenstein (Eds.).
40. Donkers F.C.L., Nieuwenhuis S., van Boxtel G.J.M. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding. Cogn Brain Res 2005, 25:777-787.
41. Oliveira F.T.P., McDonald J.J., Goodman D. Performance monitoring in the anterior Cingulate is not all error related: expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:1994-2004.
42. Cohen M.X., Elger C.E., Ranganath C. Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra. Neuroimage 2007, 35:968-978.
43. Yacubian J., Sommer T., Schroeder K., Glascher J., Braus D.F., Buchel C. Subregions of the ventral striatum show preferential coding of reward magnitude and probability. Neuroimage 2007, 38:557-563.
44. Rolls E.T., McCabe C., Redoute J. Expected value, reward outcome, and temporal difference error representations in a probabilistic decision task. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18:652-663.
45. Smith B.W., Mitchell D.G.V., Hardin M.G., Jazbec S., Fridberg D., Blair R.J.R., et al. Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task. Neuroimage 2009, 44:600-609.
46. Sailer U., Fischmeister F.P.S., Bauer H. Effects of learning on feedback-related brain potentials in a decision-making task. Brain Res 2010, 1342:85-93.
47. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating. Behav Brain Sci 1988, 11:357-374.
48. Picton T.W. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 9:456-479.
49. Haider M., Spong P., Lindsley D.B. Attention vigilance+cortical evoked-potentials in humans. Science 1964, 145:180.
50. Luck S.J., Woodman G.F., Vogel E.K. Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 2000, 4:432-440.
51. Poldrack R.A., Clark J., Pare-Blagoev E.J., Shohamy D., Creso M.J., Myers C., et al. Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature 2001, 414:546-550.
52. Shohamy D., Myers C.E., Onlaor S., Gluck M.A. Role of the basal ganglia in category learning: how do patients with Parkinson's disease learn?. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118:676-686.
53. Dickerson K.C., Li J.A., Delgado M.R. Parallel contributions of distinct human memory systems during probabilistic learning. Neuroimage 2011, 55:266-276.