An automated evaluation system for analyzing antinociceptive effects on intracolonic capsaicin-induced visceral pain-related licking behavior in mice

Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 119-123

  Hayashi, Etsuko ^a,b   Kobayashi, Tomohiro ^a   Shiroshita, Yasuteru ^a   Kuratani, Kazuyoshi ^a   Kinoshita, Mine ^a   Hara, Hideaki ^b  

^a Development and Medical Affairs Division   (Japan)

^b GIFU PHARMACEUTICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Automated analysis; Licking behavior; Mice; Visceral pain

Indexed keywords

CAPSAICIN; VOFOPITANT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANTINOCICEPTION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; LICKING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VALIDITY; VIDEORECORDING; VISCERAL PAIN;

ANIMALS; AUTOMATION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CAPSAICIN; COLON; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MALE; MICE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; RECEPTORS, NEUROKININ-1; SOFTWARE; SUBSTANCE P; VISCERAL PAIN;

ANIMALIA; MUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 80052966854     PISSN: 10568719     EISSN: 1873488X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benice T.S., Raber J. Object recognition analysis in mice using nose-point digital video tracking. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008, 168:422-430.
2. Crowley J.J., Jones M.D., O'Leary O.F., Lucki I. Automated tests for measuring the effects of antidepressants in mice. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 2004, 78:269-274.
3. Dubuisson D., Dennis S.G. The formalin test: A quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain 1977, 4:161-174.
4. Elliott G.R., Vanwersch R.A., Bruijnzeel P.L. An automated method for registering and quantifying scratching activity in mice: Use for drug evaluation. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 2000, 44:453-459.
5. Hunskaar S., Fasmer O.B., Hole K. Formalin test in mice, a useful technique for evaluating mild analgesics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1985, 14:69-76.
6. Inagaki N., Igeta K., Kim J.F., Nagao M., Shiraishi N., Nakamura N., et al. Involvement of unique mechanisms in the induction of scratching behavior in BALB/c mice by compound 48/80. European Journal of Pharmacology 2002, 448:175-183.
7. Jett M.F., Michelson S. The formalin test in rat: Validation of an automated system. Pain 1996, 64:19-25.
8. Jourdan D., Ardid D., Bardin L., Bardin M., Neuzeret D., Lanphouthacoul L., et al. A new automated method of pain scoring in the formalin test in rats. Pain 1997, 71:265-270.
9. Kawao N., Ikeda H., Kitano T., Kuroda R., Sekiguchi F., Kataoka K., et al. Modulation of capsaicin-evoked visceral pain and referred hyperalgesia by protease-activated receptors 1 and 2. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 2004, 94:277-285.
10. Laird J.M., Martinez-Caro L., Garcia-Nicas E., Cervero F. A new model of visceral pain and referred hyperalgesia in the mouse. Pain 2001, 92:335-342.
11. Laird J.M.A., Olivar T., Roza C., De Felipe C., Hunt S.P., Cervero F. Deficits in visceral pain and hyperalgesia of mice with a disruption of the tachykinin NK1 receptor gene. Neuroscience 2000, 98:345-352.
12. Maj J., Durek B., Palider W. Differences in the locomotor activity of mice as measured by an Animex and photoresis to actometer. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 1971, 23:979-981.
13. Mikami Y., Toda M., Watanabe M., Nakamura M., Toyama Y., Kawakami Y. A simple and reliable behavioral analysis of locomotor function after spinal cord injury in mice. Technical note. Journal of neurosurgery 2002, 97:142-147.
14. Nilsson M., Waters S., Waters N., Carlsson A., Carlsson M.L. A behavioural pattern analysis of hypoglutamatergic mice-effects of four different antipsychotic agents. Journal of Neural Transmission 2001, 108:1181-1196.
15. Orito K., Chida Y., Fujisawa C., Arkwright P.D., Matsuda H. A new analytical system for quantification scratching behavior in mice. The British Journal of Dermatology 2004, 150:33-38.
16. Pinhasov A., Crooke J., Rosentha D., Brenneman D., Malatynska E. Reduction of submissive behavior model for antidepressant drug activity testing: Study using a video-tracking system. Behavioural Pharmacology 2005, 16:657-664.
17. Quinn L.P., Stean T.O., Trail B., Duxon M.S., Stratton S.C., Billinton A., et al. LABORAS: Initial pharmacological validation of a system allowing continuous monitoring of laboratory rodent behavior. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2003, 130:83-92.
18. Sakiyama Y., Sujaku T., Furuta A. A novel automated method for measuring the effect of analgesics on formalin-evoked licking behavior in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008, 167:167-175.
19. Shimamura M., Kobayashi T., Kuratani K., Kinoshita M. Optimized analysis of the forced swim test using an automated experimental system: Detailed time course study in mice. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 2008, 57:80-84.
20. Shimosato K., Watanabe S. Concurrent evaluation of locomotor response to novelty and propensity toward cocaine conditioned place preference in mice. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2003, 128:103-110.
21. Van de Weerd H.A., Bulthuis R.J., Bergman A.F., Schlingmann F., Tolboom J., Van Loo P.L., et al. Validation of a new system for the automatic registration of behavior in mice and rats. Behavioural Processes 2001, 53:11-20.
22. Wolfer D.P., Madani R., Valenti P., Lipp H.P. Extended analysis of path data from mutant mice using the public domain software Wintrack. Physiology & Behavior 2001, 73:745-753.
23. Xie Y.F., Wang J., Huo F.Q., Jia H., Tang J.S. Validation of a simple automated movement detection system for formalin test in rats. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 2005, 26:39-45.