Effect Of Surface Topography Of Titanium On Surface Chemistry And Cellular Response

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 83-88

  Ong, J L ^a   Prince, C W ^b   Raikar, G N ^b,c   Lucas, L C ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d and Radiation Oncology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CALCIUM; PHOSPHORUS; TITANIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; BONE MARROW CELL; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL MOTION; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BONE MARROW; BONE MARROW CELLS; CALCIUM; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELLS, CULTURED; DENTAL POLISHING; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; PHOSPHORUS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0030155944     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199605000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alhrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;57:597-607.
2. Albrektsson T, Branemark P-I, Hansson H-A, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:155-170.
3. Kasemo B. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:832-837.
4. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, et al. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984;18:327-355.
5. Lemons JE. Dental implant tissue interfaces. In: Lewis JL, Galante JO, eds. The Bone-Implant Interface Workshop Report. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1985:136-148.
6. Doundoulakis JH. Surface analysis of titanium after sterilization: role in implant-tissue interface and bioadhesion. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58:471-478.
7. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. The biomaterial-tissue interface and its analogues in surface science and technology. In:Davies JE, ed. The Bone-Biomaterial Interface. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press; 1991:19-32.
8. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials. CRC Crit Rev Biocompat. 1986;2: 335-380.
9. May KB, Fox J, Razzoog ME, et al. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethyl methacrylate and titanium. J Prosthct Dent. 1995;73:428-431.
10. Gitto CA, Plata WG, Schaaf NG. Evaluation of the peri-implant epithelial tissue of percutaneous implant abutments supporting maxillofacial prostheses. Int d Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:197-206.
11. Brunette DM. Mechanism of directed cell migration on grooved titanium substrata. J Dent Res. 1987;66(specialissue): 114. Abstract 59.
12. Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23: 1067-1085.
13. Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:1203-1219.
14. Ohara PT, Buck RC. Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. Exp Cell Res. 1979;121:235-249.
15. Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1992;101: 209-217.
16. Ong JL, Lucas LC, Raikar GN, et al. Electrochemical corrosion analyses and characterization of surface-modified titanium. Appl Surf Sci. 1993;72:7-13.
17. Keller J, Dougherty WMJ, Grotendorst GR, et al. In vitro cell attachment to characterized CP titanium surfaces. J Adhesion. 1989;28:115-133.
18. Jansen JA, van der Waerden JPCM, de Groot K. Fibroblast and epithelial cell interactions with surface-treated implant materials. Biomaterials. 1991;12:25-31.
19. Ong JL, Prince CW, Lucas LC. Investigation on the in vitro cellular responses to Ca-P and Ti surfaces. J Dent Res. 1992;71(specialissue):184. Abstract 628.
20. Sukenik CN, Balachander N, Culp LA, et al. Modulation of cell adhesion by modification of titanium surfaces with covalently attached self-assembled monolayers., J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:1307-1323.
21. Keller JC, Draughn RA, Wightman JP, et al. Characterization of sterilized CP titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:360-367.
22. Michaels CM, Keller JC, Stanford CM. In vitro periodontal ligament fibroblast attachment to plasma-cleaned titanium surfaces. J Oral Implantai. 1991;17:132-139.
23. Ong JL, Raikar GN, Lucas LC, et al. Spectroscopic characterization of passivated titanium in a physiologic solution. J Mater Sci: Mater in Med. 1995;6:113-119.
24. Hanawa T, Ota M. Characterization of surface film formed on titanium in electrolyte using XPS. Appl Surf Sci. 1992;55:269-276.
25. Inoue T, Cox JE, Pilliar RM, et al. Effect of the surface geometry of smooth and porous-eoated titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1987;21:107-126.
26. Maniatopoulos C, Sodek J, Melcher AH. Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;254:317-330.