The development of an expert system to predict virological response to HIV therapy as part of an online treatment support tool

AIDS

Volumn 25, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 1855-1863

  Revell, Andrew D ^a   Wang, Dechao ^a   Boyd, Mark A ^b,c   Emery, Sean ^b   Pozniak, Anton L ^d   De Wolf, Frank ^e   Harrigan, Richard ^f   Montaner, Julio S G ^f   Lane, Clifford ^g   Larder, Brendan A ^a  

^a RDI   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e STICHTING HIV MONITORING   (Netherlands)

^f BRITISH COLUMBIA CENTRE FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIV AIDS   (Canada)

^g NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

antiretroviral therapy; computer models; HIV drug resistance; predictions; treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ABACAVIR; ATAZANAVIR; CD4 ANTIGEN; DARUNAVIR; DIDANOSINE; EFAVIRENZ; EMTRICITABINE; ENFUVIRTIDE; ETRAVIRINE; FOSAMPRENAVIR; INDINAVIR; LAMIVUDINE; LOPINAVIR; NELFINAVIR; NEVIRAPINE; NONNUCLEOSIDE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR; RITONAVIR; SAQUINAVIR; STAVUDINE; TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL; ZIDOVUDINE;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; EXPERT SYSTEM; FOLLOW UP; GENOTYPE; HIGHLY ACTIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; ONLINE SYSTEM; ONLINE TREATMENT SUPPORT TOOL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VIRUS LOAD;

ALGORITHMS; ANTI-HIV AGENTS; CD4 LYMPHOCYTE COUNT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION; GENOTYPE; HIV INFECTIONS; HIV-1; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; VIRAL LOAD;

EID: 80052936444     PISSN: 02699370     EISSN: 14735571     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328349a9c2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agentsin HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services; 10 January 2011. 1-166.
2. Thomson MA, Aberg JA, Cahn P, Montaner JS, Rizzardini G, Telenti A, et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV Infection: 2010 Recommendationsofthe International AIDS Society-USA Panel. JAMA 2010; 304:321-333.
3. Hirsch MS, Günthard HF, Schapiro JM, Brun-Vézinet F, Clotet B, Hammer SM, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection: 2008 recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA panel. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:266-285. (Pubitemid 351920631)
4. Sturmer M, Doerr HW, Preiser W. Variety of interpretation systems for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotyping: confirmatory information or additional confusion? Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord 2003; 3:373-382. (Pubitemid 38016624)
5. Schapiro JM, De Luca A, Harrigan R, Hellman N, McCreedy B, Pillay D, et al. Resistance assay interpretation systems vary widely in method and approach. Antivir Ther 2001; 6 (Suppl 1): 131.
6. Shafer RW, Gonzales MJ, Brun-Vezinet F. Online comparison of HIV-1 drug resistance algorithms identifies rates and causes of discordant interpretations. Antivir Ther 2001; 6:101.
7. Torti C, Quiros-Roldan E, Keulen W, Scudeller L, Caputo SL, Boucher C, et al., for the GenPherex Group of the MaSTeR Cohort. Comparison between rules-based human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotype interpretations and real or virtual phenotype: concordance analysis and correlation with clinical outcome in heavily treated patients. J Infect Dis 2003; 188:194-201. (Pubitemid 36898150)
8. Sturmer M, Doerr HW, Staszewski S, Preiser W. Comparison of nine resistance interpretation systems for HIV-1 genotyping. Antivir Ther 2003; 8:239-244. (Pubitemid 36960898)
9. De Luca A, Cingolani A, Di Giambenedetto S, Trotta MP, Baldini F, Rizzo MG, et al. Variable prediction of antiretroviral treatment outcome by different systems for interpreting geno-typic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance. J Infect Dis 2003; 187:1934-1943. (Pubitemid 36724492)
10. DeGruttola V, Dix L, D'Aquila R, Holder D, Phillups A, Ait-Khaled M, et al. The relation between baseline HIV drug resistance and response to antiretroviral therapy: re-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies using a standardized data analysis plan. Antivir Ther 2000; 5:41-48. (Pubitemid 30261205)
11. Frentz D, Boucher CAB, Assel M, De Luca A, Fabbiani M, Incardino F, et al. Comparison of HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation systems in predicting virological outcomes over time. PLoS One 2010; 5:e11505. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0011505.
12. Gallego O, Martin-Carbonero L, Aguero J, de Mendoza C, Corral A, Soriano V. Correlation between rules-based interpretation and virtual phenotype interpretation of HIV-1 genotypes for predicting drug resistance in HIV-infected individuals. J Virol Methods 2004; 121:115-118. (Pubitemid 39180033)
13. Larder BA, Revell D, Wang D, Harrigan R, Montaner J, Wegner S. Neural networks are more accurate predictors of virological response to antiretroviral therapy than rules-based genotype interpretation systems [abstract 653]. In: Proceedings of 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Denver, CO, USA; 5-8 February 2006.
14. Beerenwinkel N, Daumer M, Oette M, Korn K, Hoffman D, Kaiser R, et al. Geno2pheno: estimating phenotypic drug resistance from HIV-1 genotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3850-3855. (Pubitemid 37442263)
15. Beerenwinkel N, Sing T, Lengauer T, Rahnenführer J, Roomp K, Savenkov I, et al. Computational methods for the design of effective therapies against drug resistant HIV strains. Bioinfor-matics 2005; 21:3943-3950. (Pubitemid 41631832)
16. DiRienzo G, DeGruttola V. Collaborative HIV resistance-response database: sample size for detection of relationships between HIV-1 genotype and HIV-1 RNA response using a nonparametric approach. Antivir Ther 2002; 7:S93.
17. Larder BA, DeGruttola V, Hammer S, Harrigan R, Wegner S, Winslow D, et al. The international HIV resistance response database initiative: a new global collaborative approach to relating viral genotype treatment to clinical outcome. Antivir Ther 2002; 7:S111.
18. Wang D, Larder BA, Revell AD, Montaner J, Harrigan R, De Wolf F, et al. A comparison of three computational modelling methods for the prediction of virological response to combination HIV therapy. Artif Intell Med 2009; 47: 63-74.
19. Larder BA, Wang D, Revell A, Montaner J, Harrigan R, De Wolf F, et al. The development of artificial neural networks to predict virological response to combination HIV therapy. Antivir Ther 2007; 12:15-24. (Pubitemid 46340421)
20. Revell AD, Wang D, Harrigan R, Hamers RL, Wensing AMJ, De Wolf F, et al. Modelling response to HIV therapy without a genotype: an argument for viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65:605-607.
21. Wang D, Larder BA, Revell A, Harrigan R, Montaner J. A neural network models using clinical cohort data accurately predicts virological response and identifies regimens with increased probability of success in treatment failures [abstract 102]. In: Proceedings of VII International HIV Drug Resistance Workshop; 10-14 June 2003; Los Cabos, Mexico.
22. Larder BA, Revell AD, Mican J, Agan BK, Harris M, Torti C, et al. Clinical evaluation of the potential utility of computational modeling as an HIV treatment selection tool by physicians with considerable HIV experience. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2011; 25:29-36.
23. Zazzi M, Kaiser R, Sönnerborg A, Struck D, Altmann A, Prosperi M, et al. Prediction of response to antiretroviral therapy by human experts and by the EuResist data-driven expert system (the EVE study). HIV Med 2010; 12:211-218.
24. Gatnar E. Randomization in aggregated classification trees. In: Baier D, Wernecke K-D, editors. Innovations in classification, data science, and information systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2005. pp. 207-216.
25. Liaw A, Wiener M. Breiman and Cutler's random forests for classification and regression. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/index.html. [Accessed 30 November 2009]