Collective intelligence in the organization of science

Organization Science

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1359-1367

  Woolley, Anita Williams ^a   Fuchs, Erica ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic paradigms; Collective intelligence; Organization science; Scientific communities

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052898818     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0648     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Asch, S. E. 1955. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific Amer. 193(5) 31-35.
2. Amsterdam, B. 1972. Mirror self-image reactions before age two. Dev. Psychobiol. 5(4) 297-305.
3. Andriopoulos, C., M. W. Lewis. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 20(4) 696-717.
4. Argote, L., E. Miron-Spektor. 2011. Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1123-1137.
5. Argyres, N. 2011. Using organizational economics to study organizational capability development and strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1138-1143.
6. Ashforth, B. E., K. M. Rogers, K. G. Corley. 2011. Identity in organizations: Exploring cross-level dynamics. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1144-1156.
7. Atlee, T., G. Pór. 2000. Collective intelligence as a field of multidisciplinary study and practice. Retrieved April 6, 2011, http://www.community-intelligence.com/?q=node/130.
8. Augier, M., J. G. March, B. N. Sullivan. 2005. Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in Anglophone North America, 1945-2000. Organ. Sci. 16(1) 85-95.
9. Bechky, B. A. 2011. Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations, and negotiated orders. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1157-1167.
10. Bloom, H. 2000. Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From the Big Bang to the 21st Century. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. Borgatti, S. P., D. S. Halgin. 2011. On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1168-1181.
12. Breznitz, D. 2005. Collaborative public space in a national innovation system: A case study of the Israeli military's impact on the software industry. Indust. Innovation 21(1) 31-64.
13. Bunderson, J. S., R. E. Reagans. 2011. Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1182-1194.
14. Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2) 349-399.
15. Burton, R. M., B. Obel. 2011. Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies-And triangulation. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1195-1202.
16. Casadesus-Masanell, R., D. Yoffie. 2005. Wintel: Cooperation and conflict. Management Sci. 53(4) 584-598.
17. Crane, D. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
18. Dacin, M. T., P. A. Dacin, P. Tracey. 2011. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1203-1213.
19. Daft, R. L., A. Y. Lewin. 1990. Can organization studies begin to break out of the normal science straitjacket? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci. 1(1) 1-9.
20. Davis, J. P., C. B. Bingham, K. M. Eisenhardt. 2007. Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2) 480-499.
21. Dougherty, D., D. D. Dunne. 2011. Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1214-1223.
22. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4) 532-550.
23. Faraj, S., S. L. Jarvenpaa, A. Majchrzak. 2011. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1224-1239.
24. Feldman, M. S., W. J. Orlikowski. 2011. Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1240-1253.
25. Fuchs, E. R. H. 2010. Rethinking the role of the state in technology development: DARPA and the case for embedded network governance. Res. Policy 39(9) 1133-1147.
26. Garud, R. 2008. Conferences as venues for the configuration of emerging organizational fields: The case of cochlear implants. J. Management Stud. 45(6) 1061-1088.
27. Gawer, A., M. A. Cusumano. 2002. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
28. Glaser, B. G., A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
29. Gulley, N., K. Lakhani. 2010. The determinants of individual performance and collective value in private-collective software innovation. Working Paper 10-065, Harvard Business School, Boston. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1550352.
30. Hargadon, A., R. I. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4) 716-749.
31. Iansiti, M., R. Levien. 2004. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Harvard Business Press, Boston.
32. Jeppesen, L. B., K. R. Lakhani. 2010. Marginality and problemsolving effectiveness in broadcast research. Organ. Sci. 21(5) 1016-1033.
33. Johnson, G. J., P. J. Ambrose. 2006. Neo-tribes: The power and potential of online communities in health care. Comm. ACM 49(1) 107-113.
34. Kagan, J. 1981. The Second Year: The Emergence of Self-Awareness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Larson, J. R., Jr. 2009. In Search of Synergy in Small Group Performance. Psychology Press, New York.
37. Larsson, R., L. Bengtsson, K. Henriksson, J. Sparks. 1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 9(3) 285-305.
38. Lester, R. K., M. J. Piore. 2004. Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Lévy, P. 1997. Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace. Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA.
40. Lewis, K., B. Herndon. 2011. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1254-1265.
41. Malone, T. W., R. Laubacher, C. Dellarocas. 2010. The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 51(3) 21-31.
42. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1) 71-87.
43. McCauley, C. 1989. The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(2) 250-260.
44. McEvily, B. 2011. Reorganizing the boundaries of trust: From discrete alternatives to hybrid forms. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1266-1276.
45. McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
46. Northcraft, G. B., A. E. Tenbrunsel. 2011. Effective matrices, decision frames, and cooperation in volunteer dilemmas: A theoretical perspective on academic peer review. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1277-1285.
47. Ocasio, W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1286-1296.
48. Olk, P., T. L. Griffith. 2004. Creating and disseminating knowledge among organizational scholars: The role of special issues. Organ. Sci. 15(1) 120-129.
49. O'Reilly, C. A., III, M. Tushman. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. A. P. Brief, B. M. Staw, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 185-206.
50. Pfeffer, J. 1993. Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4) 599-620.
51. Postmes, T., R. Spears, S. Cihangir. 2001. Quality of decision making and group norms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6) 918-930.
52. Povinelli, D. J., T. M. Preuss. 1995. Theory of mind: Evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends Neurosci. 18(9) 418-424.
53. Price, D. J. d. S. 1963. Little Science, Big Science 0 0 0 and Beyond. Columbia University Press, New York.
54. Raisch, S., J. Birkinshaw, G. Probst, M. L. Tushman. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organ. Sci. 20(4) 685-695.
55. Ritvala, T., N. Granqvist. 2006. Institutional entrepreneurs and structural holes in new field emergence-Comparative case study of cholesterol-lowering functional foods and nanotechnology in Finland. Working Paper W-411, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.
56. Rosenkopf, L., P. McGrath. 2011. Advancing the conceptualization and operationalization of novelty in organizational research. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1297-1311.
57. Schippers, M. C., D. N. Den Hartog, P. L. Koopman. 2007. Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Appl. Psych. 56(2) 189-211.
58. Schippers, M. C., D. N. Den Hartog, P. L. Koopman, J. A. Wienk. 2003. Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. J. Organ. Behav. 24(6) 779-802.
59. Shapira, Z. 2011. "I've got a theory paper-Do you?": Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1312-1321.
60. Simonton, D. K. 2006. Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory. Rev. General Psych. 10(2) 98-112.
61. Smith, W. K., M. L. Tushman. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5) 522-536.
62. Sørensen, J. B., M. A. Fassiotto. 2011. Organizations as fonts of entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(5) 1322-1331.
63. Sterman, J. D., J. Wittenberg. 1999. Path dependence, competition, and succession in the dynamics of scientific revolution. Organ. Sci. 10(3) 322-341.
64. Sutton, R. I., B. M. Staw. 1995. What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3) 371-384.