The emergent syllable

The Syllable in Speech Production

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 179-186

  Ohala, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052830308     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837894     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.
2. Boë, L. J., Bessiere, P., Ladjili, N., & Audibert, N. (2008). Simple combinatorial considerations challenge Ruhlen's mother tongue theory. In B. L. Davis & K. Zajdo (Eds.), The syllable in speech production (pp. 63-93). London: Taylor & Francis.
3. de Brosses, Ch. (1765). Traité de la formation méchanique des langues, et de principes physiques de l'étymologie. 2 vols. Paris: Chez Saillant, Vincent, Desaint.
4. [Burnet, J. = Lord Monboddo]. (1773-1792). Origin and progress of language. (6 vols.) Edinburgh (various printers).
5. Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. London: John Murray.
6. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.
7. Fonagy, I. (2001). Languages within language: An evolutive approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Froeschels, E. (1952). Chewing method as therapy. AMA Archives of Otolaryngology, 56, 427-434.
9. ten Kate, L. (1723). Aenleidning tot de Kennisse van het verhevene Deel der nederduitsche Sprake. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Rudolph en Gerard Wetstein.
10. Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. MacNeilage, P. (1998). The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 499-511.
12. Müller, M. (1861). Lectures on the science of language, delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in April, May, and June, 1861. London: Longman, Green, Longman, and Roberts.
13. Ohala, J. J. (1990). Respiratory activity in speech. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 23-53). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Ohala, J. J. (1995). Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1718-25.
15. Ohala, J. J. (1998). Content first, frame later. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 525-527.
16. Ohala, J. J., & Kawasaki-Fukumori, H. (1997). Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In S. Eliasson & E. H. Jahr (Eds.), Language and its ecology: Essays in memory of Einar Haugen (pp. 343-365). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Paget, R. (1930). Human speech. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
18. Smith, N. V. (1973). The acquisition of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Stetson, R. H. (1928). Motor phonetics: A study of speech movements in action. [Archives néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale, Tome 3].
20. Weiss, D. A. (1950). Chewing and the origin of speech. In: H. H. Beebe & D. A. Weiss (Eds.), The chewing approach in speech and voice therapy Sasel: Karger.
21. Young, T. (1819). Remarks on the probabilities of errors in physical observations, and on the density of the earth, considered, especially, with rega-rd to the reduction of experiments on the pendulum. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 109, 70-95.