Multi-period calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model based on hydroclimatic clustering

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1292-1303

  Zhang, Hua ^a   Huang, Guo H ^a   Wang, Dunling ^b   Zhang, Xiaodong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fuzzy C mean Clustering; Principal Component Analysis; SWAT; Temporal dynamics

Indexed keywords

CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; CONTINUOUS SIMULATION; FLOW CONDITION; FUZZY C MEAN; HYDROCLIMATIC; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; HYDROLOGICAL SIMULATIONS; HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEM; HYDROLOGICAL YEARS; INPUT DATAS; MULTI-PERIOD; PARAMETER SET; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; SWAT; SWAT MODEL; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; TEMPORAL SCALE; TIME VARYING;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; FILTER BANKS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; DATA SET; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PARAMETERIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

CANADA;

EID: 80052844912     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Choi H.T., Beven K. Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework. J Hydrol 2007, 332:316-336.
2. Jing L., Chen B. Field investigation and hydrological modelling of a subarctic wetland - the Deer River watershed. J Environ Inform 2011, 17:36-45.
3. Liu Z., Tong S.T.Y. Using HSPF to model the hydrologic and water quality impacts of Riparian land-use change in a small watershed. J Environ Inform 2011, 17:1-14.
4. Yin Y.Y., Huang G.H., Hipel K.W. Fuzzy relation analysis for multicriteria water resources management. J Water Resour Plan Manag - Asce. 1999, 125:41-47.
5. Merz R., Bloschl G., Parajka J. Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients. J Hydrol 2006, 331:591-604.
6. Tian F, Li H, Sivapalan M. Model diagnostic analysis of seasonal switching of runoff generation mechanisms in the blue River Basin, Oklahoma, J Hydrol; in press.
7. Assania A.A., Quessy J.-F., Mesfioui M., Matteau M. An example of application: the ecological " natural flow regime" paradigm in hydroclimatology. Adv Water Resour 2010, 33:537-545.
8. Chen B. Climate change and pesticide loss in watershed systems: a simulation modeling study. J Environ Inform 2007, 10:55-67.
9. Huang G.H., Cohen S.J., Yin Y.Y., Bass B. Incorporation of inexact dynamic optimization with fuzzy relation analysis for integrated climate change impact study. J Environ Manage 1996, 48:45-68.
10. Qin X.S., Huang G.H., Chakma A., Nie X.H., Lin Q.G. A MCDM-based expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning - A case study for the Georgia Basin, Canada. Expert Sys Appl 2008, 34:2164-2179.
11. Qin X.S., Huang G.H., Chen B., Zhang B.Y. An interval-parameter waste-load-allocation model for river water quality management under uncertainty. Environ Manage 2009, 43:999-1012.
12. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 1998, 34:73-89.
13. Kite G.W., Dalton A., Dion K. Simulation of streamflow in a macroscale watershed using general-circulation model data. Water Resour Res 1994, 30:1547-1559.
14. Fang X., Pomeroy J.W. Drought impacts on Canadian prairie wetland snow hydrology. Hydrol Process 2008, 22:2858-2873.
15. Franczyk J., Chang H. The effects of climate change and urbanization on the runoff of the Rock Creek basin in the Portland metropolitan area, Oregon, USA. Hydrol Process 2009, 23:805-815.
16. Yang J., Reichert P., Abbaspour K.C., Xia J., Yang H. Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J Hydrol 2008, 358:1-23.
17. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans Asabe 2007, 50:885-900.
18. Wu K.S., Johnston C.A. Hydrologic response to climatic variability in a Great Lakes Watershed: a case study with the SWAT model. J Hydrol 2007, 337:187-199.
19. Paik K., Kim J.H., Kim H.S., Lee D.R. A conceptual rainfall-runoff model considering seasonal variation. Hydrol Process 2005, 19:3837-3850.
20. Levesque E., Anctil F., van Griensven A., Beauchamp N. Evaluation of streamflow simulation by SWAT model for two small watersheds under snowmelt and rainfall. Hydrol Sci J - J Sci Hydrol 2008, 53:961-976.
21. Hay L.E., McCabe G.J., Clark M.P., Risley J.C. Reducing streamflow forecast uncertainty: application and qualitative assessment of the Upper Klamath River Basin, Oregon. J Amer Water Resour Assoc 2009, 45:580-596.
22. Toth E. Classification of hydro-meteorological conditions and multiple artificial neural networks for streamflow forecasting. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2009, 13:1555-1566.
23. de Vos N.J., Rientjes T.H.M., Gupta H.V. Diagnostic evaluation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using temporal clustering. Hydrol Process 2010, 24:2840-2850.
24. Hsu K.L., Gupta H.V., Gao X.G., Sorooshian S., Imam B. Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): an artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis. Water Resour Res 2002, 38.
25. Reusser D.E., Blume T., Schaefli B., Zehe E. Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2009, 13:999-1018.
26. Wagener T., Boyle D.P., Lees M.J., Wheater H.S., Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S. A framework for development and application of hydrological models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2001, 5:13-26.
27. Willems P. A time series tool to support the multi-criteria performance evaluation of rainfall-runoff models. Environ Model Softw 2009, 24:311-321.
28. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements FAO Irrigation and drainage paper, Rome; 1998.
29. Zhang H., Huang G.H. Building channel networks for flat regions in digital elevation models. Hydrol Process 2009, 23:2879-2887.
30. Palmer WC. Meteorological Drought, Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C.; 1965. p. 58.
31. Guttman N.B. A sensitivity analysis of the palmer hydrologic drought index. Water Resour Bull 1991, 27:797-807.
32. Karl T.R. The sensitivity of the palmer drought severity index and palmer z-index to their calibration coefficients including potential evapotranspiration. J Climate Appl Meteorol 1986, 25:77-86.
33. Wells N., Goddard S., Hayes M.J. A self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index. J Climate 2004, 17:2335-2351.
34. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, California; 1993.
35. Bonsal B., Regier M. Historical comparison of the 2001/2002 drought in the Canadian Prairies. Climate Res 2007, 33:229-242.
36. Guttman N.B. Comparing the Palmer Drought Index and the standardized precipitation index. J Am Water Resour Assoc 1998, 34:113-121.
37. Kunkel K.E., Changnon S.A. Climate-years in the true prairie: temporal fluctuations of ecologically critical climate conditions. Climatic Change 2003, 61:101-122.
38. Sauchyn D.J., Barrow E.M., Hopkinson R.F., Leavitt P.R. Aridity on the Canadian plains. Géo Phys Quat 2002, 56:247-259.
39. Dunne T., Leopold L.B. Water in environmental planning 1998, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
40. Quiring S.M., Kluver D.B. Relationship between winter/spring snowfall and summer precipitation in the Northern Great Plains of North America. J Hydrometeorol 2009, 10:1203-1217.
41. Brunetti M., Maugeri M., Monti F., Nannia T. Temperature and precipitation variability in Italy in the last two centuries from homogenised instrumental time series. Int J Climatol 2006, 26:345-381.
42. Bezdek J.C. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms 1981, Plenum, New York.
43. Xie X.L.L., Beni G. A validity measure for fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1991, 13:841-847.
44. White K.L., Chaubey I. Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2005, 41:1077-1089.
45. Green C.H., van Griensven A. Autocalibration in hydrologic modeling: Using SWAT2005 in small-scale watersheds. Environ Model Softw 2008, 23:422-434.
46. Stone M.C., Hotchkiss R.H., Hubbard C.M., Fontaine T.A., Mearns L.O., Arnold J.G. Impacts of climate change on Missouri River Basin water yield. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2001, 37:1119-1129.
47. Zhang H., Huang G.H., Wang D.L., Zhang X.D. Uncertainty assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology of small prairie wetlands. J Hydrol 2011, 396:94-103.
48. Somura H., Arnold J., Hoffman D., Takeda I., Mori Y., Di Luzio M. Impact of climate change on the Hii River basin and salinity in Lake Shinji: a case study using the SWAT model and a regression curve. Hydrol Process 2009, 23:1887-1900.
49. van Griensven A., Meixner T., Grunwald S., Bishop T., Diluzio A., Srinivasan R. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 2006, 324:10-23.
50. van Griensven A., Meixner T. A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models. J Hydroinform 2007, 9:277-291.
51. Duan Q.Y., Sorooshian S., Gupta V. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 1992, 28:1015-1031.
52. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 1970, 10:282-290.
53. Faramarzi M., Abbaspour K.C., Schulin R., Yang H. Modelling blue and green water resources availability in Iran. Hydrol Process 2009, 23:486-501.
54. Chipanshi A.C., Findlater K.M., Hadwen T., O'Brien E.G. Analysis of consecutive droughts on the Canadian Prairies. Climate Res 2006, 30:175-187.
55. Kallis G. Droughts. Ann Rev Environ Resour 2008, 33:85-118.
56. Wu R.G., Kinter J.L. Analysis of the relationship of US droughts with SST and soil moisture: distinguishing the time scale of droughts. J Climate 2009, 22:4520-4538.
57. Li Z.L., Shao Q.X., Xu Z.X., Cai X.T. Analysis of parameter uncertainty in semi-distributed hydrological models using bootstrap method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Yingluoxia watershed in northwest China. J Hydrol 2010, 385:76-83.
58. Kannan N., White S.M., Worrall F., Whelan M.J. Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modelling in SWAT-2000. J Hydrol 2007, 332:456-466.
59. Zhang X.S., Srinivasan R., Bosch D. Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using Genetic Algorithms and Bayesian Model Averaging. J Hydrol 2009, 374:307-317.