A conceptual rainfall-runoff model considering seasonal variation

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 19, 2005, Pages 3837-3850

  Paik, Kyungrock ^a   Kim, Joong H ^b   Kim, Hung S ^c   Lee, Dong R ^d  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c Inha University   (South Korea)

^d Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conceptual rainfall runoff models; Genetic algorithms; Harmony search; Heuristic algorithms; Powell's method; Tank models

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HEURISTIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; RAIN; RUNOFF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; HARMONY SEARCH; POWELL METHOD; SEASONAL VARIATION; TANK MODELS;

WATERSHEDS;

ALGORITHM; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SEASONAL VARIATION;

EID: 30444443166     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5984     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cooper VA, Nguyen VTV, Nicell JA. 1997. Evaluation of global optimization methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff model calibration. Water Science and Technology 36(5): 53-60.
2. Dawdy DR, O'Donnell T. 1965. Mathematical models of catchment behaviour. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 91(HY4): 123-137.
3. De Jong KA. 1975. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Dissertation Abstracts International 36(10): 5140B.
4. Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta V. 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research 28(4): 1015-1031.
5. Franchini M, Pacciani M. 1991. Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology 122: 161-219.
6. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV. 2001. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2): 60-68.
7. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV. 2002. Harmony search optimization: application to pipe network design. International Journal of Modeling and Simulation 22(2): 125-133.
8. Goldberg DE. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley Longman.
9. Gue RL, Thomas ME. 1968. Mathematical Methods in Operations Research. Macmillan: 100-125.
10. Holland JH. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press.
11. Jamieson DG, Wilkinson JC. 1972. River Dee research program, a short-term control strategy for multipurpose reservoir systems. Water Resources Research 8(4): 911-920.
12. Kim HY, Park SW. 1986. An evaluation of parameter variation for a linear reservoir (TANK) model with watershed characteristics. Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineering 28(2): 42-52.
13. Kim JH, Geem ZW, Kim ES. 2001. Parameter estimation of the nonlinear Muskingum model using harmony search. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37(5): 1131-1138.
14. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi M. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598): 671-680.
15. Lee KS, Geem ZW. 2004. A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Computers and Structures 82(9-10): 781-798.
16. Leopold LB, Maddock TJ. 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. United States, Geological Survey, Professional Papers 252.
17. Nagai A, Kadoya M. 1979. Optimization techniques for parameter identification of runoff models. Annual Report of Disaster Prevention Research Institute in Kyoto University, 22(B-2).
18. Paik F, Jeong JH, Kim JH. 2001a. Use of a harmony search for optimal design of coffer dam drainage pipes. Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers 21(2-B): 119-128.
19. Paik K, Kim HS, Lee DR, Kim JH. 2001b. Estimation of daily evapotranspiration based on water budget method. In Conference Proceedings, Korea Water Resources Associations, vol. 1, Daegu, 12 May; 483-488.
20. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran - the Art of Scientific Computing, second edition. Cambridge University Press: 406-413.
21. Sugawara M, Funiyuki M. 1956. A method of revision of the river discharge by means of a rainfall model. Collection of Research Papers about Forecasting Hydrologic Variables: 14-18.
22. Sugawara M, Watanabe I, Ozaki E, Katsuyama Y. 1984. Tank model with snow component. NRC for Disaster Prevention Science and Technology Agency, Japan.
23. Wang QJ. 1991. The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research 27(9): 2467-2471.
24. World Meteorological Organization. 1975. Intercomparison of conceptual models used lin operational hydrological forecasting. Operational Hydrology Report No. 7. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland.